Why dont you also blurt out the clauses after leaving out which the person should follow?? And why dont you also blurt out the direct words ofMuhammad in which he said:
SahihBukhari (52:260) - "TheProphet said, If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him."
Re: Re: @Wahaj Faridy - Apostasy!!
by Jai Babu on Mar 16, 2011 10:27 PM
The entire world sees the hordes of Is1amist fanatics who support terrorists & violence while calling for jihad against any dissenters or apostates or non-believers on the streets of Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, etc. See how the Asia Bibi controversy and the debate over the Blasphemy law in Pakistan caused Governor Taseer's death And minister Bhatti's death. And what did we see? Lawyers, ordinary people, mullahs and clerics showering praise on a grinning Qadri, who shot an unarmed man in cold blood! Why do Islamists use violence and anarchy as a means of highlighting their grievances and affecting change when it comes to their faith or way of life? When any non-Muslim action offends voraties of Islam, the result are riots, insurrections, death threats, fatwas and the threat of VIOLENCE against innocent people! Is1am inspired Terrorism is the biggest threat to multi-cultural, multi-faith democratic societies like India, Europe, US, etc. Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and impose its will on all other religions, cultures and upon democratic institutions. To suppose that such a version of Islam can peacefully co-exist with followers of other faiths is, to be candid, an increasingly absurd proposition
Re: Re: Re: @Wahaj Faridy - Apostasy!!
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 10:37 PM
Your talking to him is the same as his praying to the wall forVirgins 5 times everyday!!
Both are of no use!! He has decided to be a life long slave of ArabImperialists!!
Re: Re: @Wahaj Faridy - Apostasy!!
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 10:25 PM
What about these??
SahihBukhari (83:37) - "AllahsApostle neverKilled anyone except in one of the following three situations: (1) A person whoKilled somebody unjustly, was killed (inQisas,) (2) a married person who committed illegalSexualIntercourse and (3) a man who fought againstAllah and HisApostle and desertedIslam and became anApostate."
Bukhari (84:57) - "[In the words of] AllahsApostle, 'Whoever changed his IslamicReligion, then killHim.'"
SahihBukhari (89:271) - A man who embracesIslam, then reverts toJudaism is to beKilled according to "the verdict ofAllah and hisApostle."
Re: Re: Re: @Wahaj Faridy - Apostasy!!
by Wahaj Faridy on Mar 16, 2011 10:32 PM
I repeat...Those Hadith had relevance against SPIES who were temporarily entering Izlam to gather intelligence for war purpose. Go read circumstances of that time wherein lots of attacks were happening against muzl1ms, and some people acted clever by claiming to embrace Izlam, and then flee away after gathering intelligence.
Otherwise, If one Disagrees with faith, he can walk out... no issues
Re: Re: Fraud
by Harold Kumar on Mar 16, 2011 10:26 PM
He was pardoned and as per Sharia law, it doesn't matter whether he murdered or not now. So what is the problem here?
Jaoi Babu, Even during pre-independence period, almost all the sects of muslims were present in Muslim league except deobandis. League wanted a seperate nation wheras deobandis wanted to islamise india.Hence they resisted partition. But all the musis believed in one thing-not to come under power of the natives.
Re: Laws
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 10:03 PM
Ha!! Do you even feel like asking this after seeing their lifestyle which has remained unaltered for 1400 years??!!
They are the "diWINE laws" that should never be altered!! No amendments nothing!! Even in 3011 AD, you can see them using the same laws (if their cult is still alive)!!
Re: Re: Laws
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 10:11 PM
Why dont you also blurt out the clauses after leaving out which the person should follow?? And why dont you also blurt out the direct words ofMuhammad in which he said:
SahihBukhari (52:260) - "TheProphet said, If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him."
Re: WHY IS INDIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM UNDER FOOT OF PRESIDENT ??
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 10:00 PM
How many times have you decided to type the sameShit?? Has yourMullah given you an imposition?
Re: Re: Re: WHY IS INDIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM UNDER FOOT OF PRESIDENT
by freewill on Mar 16, 2011 10:04 PM
Thats` why u are blind.Humanity is based on non-killing,which you will never understand.
Re: Re: Re: WHY IS INDIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM UNDER FOOT OF PRESIDENT
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 10:13 PM
Humanity is a term understood only by humans!!!!
Re: WHY IS INDIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM UNDER FOOT OF PRESIDENT ??
by Prash on Mar 16, 2011 10:15 PM
Hey Wahaj, INDIAN Justice system???!!! for something happened in Pak??!!!
Re: WHY IS INDIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM UNDER FOOT OF PRESIDENT ??
by Marathi Indian on Mar 16, 2011 10:00 PM
If somethings are wrong we can chqange those laws. Is it possible in your laws??
