Pak govt is bunch of f00lz. Even if family was okay h $2 Million, they should have got them $100 Million. Atl then people would have not smelt coercion and surrender to US.
BLOOD Money is supported by Hadith if victim family accepts it of own accord.
Those who want to laugh at it must remember that in situations where dependents are poor, a massive sum MAY BE more acceptable than getting retaliation.
In anycase, Blood money can not be force.
Contrast this with Indian LAW and US law and UK law, where President / Queen has power to grant clemency to murderer without any compensation to victim family. No body will question his/her action of letting Murderer walk away
Re: THIS CASE SMACKS OF COERCION OF VICTIM FAMILIES
by AMARESH CHOWDHURY on Mar 16, 2011 09:20 PM
Davis would be released, I have posted many times, and gave the reason.
Reason could be anything, but Davis would be released, and under no circumstances Pak would prosecute him,
Mu11ahs are bas1cally phat000s / c0wards and they do not any c0urage, after all what they had been supplying........... to US soldiers after all these soldiers are away from their w1fe and G1irl friends for years.
Mu11ash requ1res money only and bas1cally phat00s.
in tieup with DLF! As on March 2009, Vadra's company received unsecured loans amounting to Rs 25 crore from DLF! I bet the I-T sleuths (it really should be sloths) cannot see it!
with social security and faith to Victims that they will not think of having blood money or bribes from US government.Now were Has that Faith gone on whose name so many innocent lifes are being ruined from centuries.In end it turned out to be " It is all about Money, Honey."
Re: Initially it was thought that Taliban will so much money alon
by Marathi Indian on Mar 16, 2011 09:10 PM
But we heard that Osaama was hving lotofmoney?
Re: how much blood money for all pakis
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 09:08 PM
I think its high time it should be only blood and no money at all to all the Pornis!!
Re: ///
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 09:04 PM
ShabanaAzmi and TeestaSetalvad might have already started biting their nails and fingering theirPussies now because their NGO crap will not work withUlema!!
Re: Re: ///
by freewill on Mar 16, 2011 09:09 PM
All those who support shariah are simply sick and are blinded by religion.Such guys will support people like taseer.
Re: @wahaj
by Jai Babu on Mar 16, 2011 09:05 PM
The fact is that the concept of DIYA or blood money is accepted as per Sharia. The Americans used that loophole to spring Davis and nobody could object. What a ridiculous situation! That too when the Jamait ul Is1am had offered a Rs 1lakh inducement to the families of the dead not to accept blood money from the Americans! I guess $1 million is definitely more attractive than 1lakh Pakistani rupees!
Re: Re: @wahaj
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 09:07 PM
Now the solution is very simple for JuI, they will send another belt-strapped virginSeeker to the house!!
Your swamiji never mentioned anything about the concept of blood money. His only DIVINE advice was "beheading" for a murderer!! And ShariahLaw cannot deviate from theQuranSunnahAndHadiths!!
Re: @Wahaj Faridy - ShariatLaw and blood money??!!
by Wahaj Faridy on Mar 16, 2011 09:10 PM
BLOOD Money is supported by Hadith.
Those who want to laugh at it must remember that in situations where dependents are poor, a massive sum MAY BE more acceptable than getting retaliation.
In anycase, Blood money can not be force.
Contrast this with Indian LAW and US law and UK law, where President / Queen has power to grant clemency to murderer without any compensation to victim family. No body will question his/her action of letting Murderer walk away
Re: Re: @Wahaj Faridy - ShariatLaw and blood money??!!
by Anti Semetic on Mar 16, 2011 09:18 PM
First of all, there is no death penalty for a murderer in India or the West unless it is the rarest of the rare cases!! So, your comparision is absolutely absurd!! Death penalty is not given for each and every murder!!!
Re: Re: @Wahaj Faridy - ShariatLaw and blood money??!!
by ashish anand on Mar 16, 2011 09:20 PM
In a democratic system, there are checks & balances and media hue & cry will not allow a murderer to be pardoned. Further, like any other executive action, courts can examine the pardon to check whether judicious application of mind was applied while granting pardon. But blood money is a contract between two persons without any role for the court. It's like saying that a rapist/murderer should not be trialed as he paid money to the victim or its family. Personal contracts for such brutal offences can not have any role in a law abiding society as it's prone to abuse, malpractices, external pressure, subjective assessment of value of life, etc.
Re: Re: @Wahaj Faridy - ShariatLaw and blood money??!!
by Jai Babu on Mar 16, 2011 09:17 PM
So the USA is killing the poverty stricken tribals along the Af-Pak border region through drones and giving AID worth billions to the Pakis. I can claim the AID is blood money & justified under the principle of Sharia and Hadith?
