Mr. Krishnan, do you feel that any law should violate the basic human rights? If the complaint is found right after investigations, arrest the defaulter. No law in world can allow the arrest of a person without any substantial ground. A complaint by a person is not adequate to take this extreme step.
Supreme Court has removed non democratic, caste based evil, why so much hue and cry, We all oppose any move to restore status quo prior to this decision. This will create not only fear in many but also against all humanity and hate spreading.
Re: SC ST
by ANANTH MADRI on Apr 10, 2018 01:30 PM
In this artical he has told so many things like SC/ST people have no protection of life, they do not have right to dignity, their children do not have the right to take water from the same place in school, their children cannot sit in the front row in class,But nobody want to discuss on this. it clearly shows the mentality of these people who are written there comments here.
Mr. Krishnan, how can you be so inconsiderate for that one person facing false charges of this act. What if it had been you. Enough rediff giving platform to such useless human
I am sure many SC people benefitted from reservation and continue to use it to benefit their family members only once they come up like this author... Why not the author fight for reservation for SC/ST for one generation only so that million other SC/ST can benefit from the reservation. The reservation policy is cornered by select few and not allowed for the really poor for whom it is reserved.
You people (Rediff) make controversy over all the issues. Now you have crossed the limit and dared to criticize the Supreme Court of India? If you have the freedom of expression then I have also the same. You people are 100% responsible to create unrest in the country by writing such type of articles. The press must be punished in public for such crime.
Re: 'Supreme Court should have heard 300 mn SC/STs'
by Intel Midfield on Apr 10, 2018 11:20 AM
You will see these presstitutes at their best till LS2019. Now they will highlight every issue that may go against BJP govt. and trying to create an atmosphere as if every body is against Modi. These shameless creatures are nothing but the extended version of JNU traitor Gang
Re: Re: 'Supreme Court should have heard 300 mn SC/STs'
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Apr 10, 2018 11:29 AM
After 2019,with the rout of BJP,there will be no need of CheerLeader Presstitutes like Timesnow,Republictv,Zeenews,newsX etc.,as all of them will be finished along with thier mentor!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: 'Supreme Court should have heard 300 mn SC/STs'
by P S SHAH on Apr 10, 2018 02:40 PM
first win the election of 2019 before writing nonsense. So far all your predictions has gone wrong and will go wrong in future also.
Re: Re: Re: 'Supreme Court should have heard 300 mn SC/STs'
by P S SHAH on Apr 10, 2018 02:40 PM
first win the election of 2019 before writing nonsense. So far all your predictions has gone wrong and will go wrong in future also.
Re: 'Supreme Court should have heard 300 mn SC/STs'
by MS Vasan on Apr 10, 2018 11:27 AM
The author is an IAS and he asks supreme court to hear 300 million SC/STs. I shudder to think people of such caliber being IAS and administering this country. No wonder India is in such Shi**y state with IAS officers of such caliber..
Re: 'Supreme Court should have heard 300 mn SC/STs'
by MS Vasan on Apr 10, 2018 11:27 AM
The author is an IAS and he asks supreme court to hear 300 million SC/STs. I shudder to think people of such caliber being IAS and administering this country. No wonder India is in such Shi**y state with IAS officers of such caliber..
You people (Rediff) make controversy over all the issues. Now you have crossed the limit and dared to criticize the Supreme Court of India? If you have the freedom of expression then I have also the same. You people are 100% responsible to create unrest in the country by writing such type of articles. The press must be punished in public for such crime.
Re: 'Supreme Court should have heard 300 mn SC/STs'
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Apr 10, 2018 11:31 AM
Rememeber Kalyan Singh????How he obeyed the supreme court to protect the Structure in Ayodhya??????????
Re: 'Supreme Court should have heard 300 mn SC/STs'
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Apr 10, 2018 11:32 AM
Rememeber Kalyan Singh????How he obeyed the supreme court to protect the Structure in Ayodhya??????????
I have gone through the entire discussion by Mr. Krishnan. But is he clarified why such act are there to arrest any Officer of just a complain of SC/ST. Is he agree to provide reservation on the basis of Cast? if so why? Why not it on economic basis? Why reservation giving in jobs/promotion on cast basis? Reservation becaome a psychology of a group, real pooer of SC/ST are nt getting any benifits. The verdict of SC is a welcome stand, If the reservation continue the most worst day in our society will be imminent. Group clash social unrest will b the alternative result of this cast base reservation. Facilitate to poor people is our duty but this doesn't means deprive the rights of other i.e the general cast.
Re: SC Verdict on Sc/ST Act.
by MS Vasan on Apr 10, 2018 11:23 AM
All reservations must be based on economic consideration. Otherwise people like this author will corner benefit meant for really poor..
I have gone through the entire discussion by Mr. Krishnan. But is he clarified why such act are there to arrest any Officer of just a complain of SC/ST. Is he agree to provide reservation on the basis of Cast? if so why? Why not it on economic basis? Why reservation giving in jobs/promotion on cast basis? Reservation becaome a psychology of a group, real pooer of SC/ST are nt getting any benifits. The verdict of SC is a welcome stand, If the reservation continue the most worst day in our society will be imminent. Group clash social unrest will b the alternative result of this cast base reservation. Facilitate to poor people is our duty but this doesn't means deprive the rights of other i.e the general cast.
