Please check you posts. You said that present Karmas cannot lessen past Karma. This is nowhere written in BG. Even though Wiki is no encylo (as it is not written by experts-you can check it), the excerpt doesn't support your statement.
Do you know that even a thought-process in your mind now is accruing Karma and changing the course of events in your life ?
Re: Dear Vascado
by Vascado on Jan 12, 2015 05:54 PM
I only suggested the logical impossibility of present karma lessening past karma in a specific context. I never claimed anywhere that the present karma cannot lessen past karma. You have twisted my comment to suit your perspective.
[quote]You are totally confused. How can the sins of past life be lessened by your present karma ? That would negate the essence of karma where you need to suffer in the present for your misdeeds in the past. It would also be doing tremendous injustice to the one who was at the receiving end from you in his/her past life. Let us take the example of Hitler who was responsible for the Holacaust responsible for the death of over 50 million people. Taking your logic forward, in his next life, if he performs good deeds, his sins would be lessened. But is it not an injustice to the 50 million people who faced his fury ? Now this 50 million people taking revenge under the law of karma is another story which according to your theory may take about 200 million years.[/quote] This is what you wrote.
[quote]You are totally confused. How can the sins of past life be lessened by your present karma ? That would negate the essence of karma where you need to suffer in the present for your misdeeds in the past. It would also be doing tremendous injustice to the one who was at the receiving end from you in his/her past life. Let us take the example of Hitler who was responsible for the Holacaust responsible for the death of over 50 million people. Taking your logic forward, in his next life, if he performs good deeds, his sins would be lessened. But is it not an injustice to the 50 million people who faced his fury ? Now this 50 million people taking revenge under the law of karma is another story which according to your theory may take about 200 million years.[/quote] I will answer above.
Re: Vascado, this is what you wrote
by Vascado on Jan 12, 2015 05:32 PM
Well that was my own inference as a fall out of the consequences of the l@w of k@rma which you can counter.
But meanwhile, I also want you to prove what I have posted below.
You must prove that Bh@gvad Gita has its own concept with regard to reb1rth which is quite different from the H1nduised version of Karmic theory. Ofcourse as I already said there is a difference here when BG claims that it is the L0rd who steers the l@w of k@rma and he is an interventionist. Even assuming you prove that, it only muddles the whole theory of K@rma even further with various concepts emanating from different f@iths conflicting and contradicting one another which is enough to prove their falsehood. In this scenario, there is little room for any concept to claim itself as superior and slam another as inferior as the whole theory is itself convuluted.
Re: DEAR INDIAN - WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE IS ?
by Indian on Jan 12, 2015 06:15 PM
Lord doesn't interfere in the laws of Karma. Lord Krishna makes this very clear in BG. His grace to his devotees is also within the laws of Karma.
Re: Re: DEAR INDIAN - WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE IS ?
by Vascado on Jan 13, 2015 03:05 PM
I think you have not read the BG well. Please go through it once again.
Re: Re: DEAR INDIAN - WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE IS ?
by Vascado on Jan 13, 2015 03:05 PM
I think you have not read the BG well. Please go through it once again.
Re: Re: DEAR INDIAN - WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE IS ?
by Vascado on Jan 13, 2015 03:05 PM
I think you have not read the BG well. Please go through it once again.
Re: Re: DEAR INDIAN - WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE IS ?
by Vascado on Jan 13, 2015 03:05 PM
I think you have not read the BG well. Please go through it once again.
Re: Re: DEAR INDIAN - WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE IS ?
by Vascado on Jan 13, 2015 03:06 PM
I think you have not read the BG well. Please go through it once again.
Re: Re: DEAR INDIAN - WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE IS ?
by Vascado on Jan 13, 2015 03:06 PM
I think you have not read the BG well. Please go through it once again.
Re: Re: DEAR INDIAN - WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE IS ?
by Vascado on Jan 13, 2015 03:06 PM
I think you have not read the BG well. Please go through it once again.
I am aware of your problem and I am too experiencing it. By the way, I didn't quote any authority on Bh@gvad Gita. I just reproduced the preamble as mentioned in the W1k1pedia with respect to the H1nduised version of K@rmic theory. For some reason, you do nto believe in the integrity of W1kipedia which is considered as the main source of information the World over and has impeccable reputation. What you need to prove me is that Bh@gvad Gita doesn't deal with the l@w of karma and has its own K@rmic theory based on the rebirth cycle.
I am aware of your problem and I am too experiencing it. By the way, I didn't quote any authority on Bh@gvad Gita. I just reproduced the preamble as mentioned in the W1k1pedia with respect to the H1nduised version of K@rmic theory. For some reason, you do nto believe in the integrity of W1kipedia which is considered as the main source of information the World over and has impeccable reputation. What you need to prove me is that Bh@gvad Gita doesn't deal with the l@w of karma and has its own K@rmic theory based on the rebirth cycle.
I am aware of your problem and I am too experiencing it. By the way, I didn't quote any authority on Bh@gvad Gita. I just reproduced the preamble as mentioned in the W1k1pedia with respect to the H1nduised version of K@rmic theory. For some reason, you do nto believe in the integrity of W1kipedia which is considered as the main source of information the World over and has impeccable reputation. What you need to prove me is that Bh@gvad Gita doesn't deal with the l@w of karma and has its own K@rmic theory based on the rebirth cycle.
I read your posts. You are unnecessarily getting irritated. You quoted the authority of Bhagwad Gita and I said that what you claim is not supported by BG. You have asked me to check Wikipedia which can be written and edited by anyone on this earth whether he is an expert on the subject or not.
Re: Dear Vascado
by Vascado on Jan 12, 2015 04:20 PM
I am not irritated by any means. The onus is on you to prove your claim that BG has a different take on K@rma altogether except for the L0rd acting as an interventionist.
