YSR Jagan and YSR is is imternasional Guru of caruption. YSRCP stonds for YSR caruption party. Who is in black money list is just not important. Some importance is how much and most important is can India get back the B Money and if so how much. Rest all is gosssip and shou;ld not find place in news. Yes once money reaches back to India, other related news would be of some interest. The names may tell oters that nat ote such B money people at the most
Re: Re: Congrats SC!
by arupratan sit on Oct 30, 2014 12:24 PM
many SC advocates must have named in that List. Lawyears are in a better position to know the loopholes of Laws.they never give u money receipt.....justice delayed is injustice.
Re: Re: Modi proved to be a puppet PM of Gujju Blackmoney kings
by Reportabuse on Nov 01, 2014 12:50 PM
@against pseudos so UPA has all the names too ..and yes SC never asked foir a dead line and upa never opposed the SC order dated 2011 of public ly giving the list ...SC asked NDA o0r BJP Modi to submiy the list as BJP governemnt made a pettition to Sc to revoke its order dated 2011 of making public the list ...why UPA never opposed it yes BJP opposed it wanted to revoke it .....and BJP again sublitted them list of only 627 where it says it had submitted earlier too in june which SC was not even aware ..eh ......manuwadis r sure ruiling now ...earlier bab ramdev was asking upa to make or decalre all swiss accounts be declared nationlised ..today the baba thug is silent on the issue ....so anyway u r happy that now no names will be made public ....that's what is wanted by corrupt thuigs ...that list be never made public ....even when all know that there is no money anymore in these accounts .....but names do reveal the most corrupt copmmunal names ....so u wanna hide it eh .....or will some whistle blower even foreign may make it open ..yes now only some whistle blower that too foreigner can make public the list ,....but yes Modi and his crook ministers jaitley will never reveal the names .....
In Switzerland you have very many small and niche private banks that are not known to many and most of the rich ppl usually stxsh money in those banks and not only in high street bank such as HSBC. So where is this investigation going? are they going to stop with HSBC and Indian Bank?! WTF!
In Switzerland you have very many small and niche private banks that are not known to many and most of the rich ppl usually stash money in those banks and not only in high street bank such as HSBC. So where is this investigation going? are they going to stop with HSBC and Indian Bank?! WTF!
It appeared that the Supreme Court ordered the govt to make public the names in the list: at least that was the impression one got from news reports, and the exploitation of the reports by anti-BJP parties and persons. However, the govt submitted to the Court a sealed envelope containing the list and other documents. It was expected that the Supreme Court would make the list public, BUT the Court refused even to look at the list, and has decided to hand it over to the "SIT". Will the anti-BJP parties now accuse the Court of "shielding" the criminals? Further, the govt tells the Court that it has aready given the List to the SIT on 27 June; and the Court gives the same List again to SIT! What is the meaning of all this? It has resulted in unnecessary and extremely unfair denigration of the govt. I wish the Supreme Court will set the score right. At least it should order stopping political parties like the Congress and AAP in continuing their defamatory statements. Further, if the Supreme Court does not even keep a copy of the List given to it by the government, how can it ensure that SIT will examine/investigate all the cases, or even the same cases as in the List? Is the Court relying entirely on the integrity of the SIT, which, of course, has two retired SC judges as its head and as his deputy? If so, what was the purpose of ordering the govt to submit the List?
Re: �
by Reportabuse on Oct 30, 2014 07:42 AM
simple BJP never submitted complete list and SC was not aware of that and yes while giving afidavit and arguing the case BJP never said that they had given the list to SIT....and now it is clear that when UPA did not make public the list it was accordanc with law too ..as SC too now agrees and BJP is putting forth the same arguement ..so BJP was lying to nation on black money and yes Ambani and Adani have been let off by BJP Governement led b y Modi ....so all rssbjp voters go bow to Modi after five years when also Modi fails to bring any black money ...
Re: �
by KRISHNAMURTHY V on Oct 30, 2014 07:49 AM
The judges of the SC were just playing to the galleries for personal propaganda. You had clearly indicated what had happened now -- handing over the same list that had been with the SIT since June, and repeating the same statement of the Govt that 'it will not reveal the names unless investigation is over'.
