Re: what happened to Indian army?
by Informed on Mar 23, 2013 04:10 AM
you moron, do you even read english or do you need this article in arabic? Modi called in Army much earlier than other cms and pms .
Re: what happened to Indian army?
by A P on Mar 23, 2013 04:29 AM
Ahmad miyan, While I understand the tone of the article is very biased and strongly pro-modi - can you deny any facts presented in it before you rubbish it off.
Re: what happened to Indian army?
by National Highway on Mar 23, 2013 05:21 PM
You are right about this article author but it has nothing to do with religion. RSS is against AP bifurcation to avoid increase of left wing extremism. However BJP is supporting the Nizam lovers who want AP bifurcation. So BJP and its followers use religion only when it benefits them.
no matter how long the article is praising modi who has killed more than 2000 muslims. muslim will not forget this cruelty Modi,s end will be like narsimha rao
Re: modi the killer
by Informed on Mar 23, 2013 04:11 AM
moron, it was not modi. Even if you daddy was in power that time, those muslims would have been killed.
Re: Re: modi the killer
by adam smith on Mar 23, 2013 06:07 AM
These morons only understand the madarasa language - of hate and murders.
Does he know how many are being killed by the people of the 'most peaceful community' all over the world. They are so much into killing that they even enjoy killing their own 'peaceful' people!!
Re: modi the killer
by National Highway on Mar 23, 2013 06:42 PM
Where does Pakistan end up for destroying temples? muslims should object pakistan destroying temples and for extremism in kashmir. Hindus should agitate for babri demolition and riots in the name of religion. These kinds of attitudes are must if we want to live peacefully in India.
Editor's note: John D. Sutter is a human rights and social justice columnist for CNN Opinion. E-mail him at CTL@CNN.com or follow him on Twitter (@jdsutter), Facebook or Google . Hattiesburg, Mississippi (CNN) -- He didn't want them to know his secret. Andre Cooley lives in Mississippi, one of 29 states where it's legal for employers to fire a person for being gay. In that environment, why would he risk being out of the closet at work? Cooley grew up in foster care and wanted to give back. His job as a juvenile corrections officer was too central to his identity. So he covered it up. The 27-year-old lowered his voice. Talked less with his hands. Pretended he was straight, all to protect himself. But it didn't work.
John D. Sutter On June 14, 2010, when he says his boyfriend became violent in his apartment, Cooley called the police. He didn't think twice about it -- not until a colleague responded to the call. That led Cooley's bosses at the Forrest County Sheriff's Office to find out about his sexual orientation. Three days later, despite the fact that he was listed as the victim in a police report and was off duty at the time, he was fired. Shining a light on same-sex abuse Become a fan of CNNOpinion Stay up to date on the latest opinion, analysis and conversations through social media. Join us at Facebook/CNNOpinion and follow us @CNNOpinion on Twitter. We welcome your ideas and comments.
Cooley said it's because his boss found out he's gay. "From one day to the n
Mr. Modi Visited USA in Clinton time as future leader. With him whoever came they all now days are holding important position! It show that USA do have information and studies on foreign leaders. The article pointing restraining Mr. Modi has lot of value. Not only foreign governments but Indian media also involved in conspiracy against Mr. Modi.
Re: What written in defense of Mr. Modi is 100% truth.
by National Highway on Mar 23, 2013 06:45 PM
The article says NM may not involved in the riots but incompetent in controlling them in a tiny (comparatively) state. So how is he suitable to control big country like India?
While Modi may not admit it, the fact remains that in March 2002 he had been barely in the saddle for six months and had not come to grips with teh state administration. It is noteworthy that he had held no office before this and had no administrative experience.
If the killer cud not hv controled the riots for inexpreienced then how do you extrimists ppls dreaming the killer become PM,even he has not any exprience in centre body of BJP or previous BJP guv????Kindly explain!!!
Re: Re: Extrimists fellass note down this point!!!
by National Highway on Mar 23, 2013 06:48 PM
It was wrong to elect inexperience Rajiv at that time and it won't become right by doing another mistake of electing incompetent (not able to control the riots) state leader like NM as the PM.
Re: Extrimists fellass note down this point!!!
by Common Sense on Mar 23, 2013 02:27 AM
Read the article again. Nowhere does the author suggest that Modi be given a fair chance at PM ship...
The whole article is about Wharton's ridiculous flip flop. The author is making a genuine point in defending Modi when it comes to Wharton cancelling their invite based on falsified alligations against Modi.
Re: Re: Extrimists fellass note down this point!!!
by National Highway on Mar 23, 2013 06:50 PM
The article says NM may not be involved in the riots but incompetent in controlling them in a tiny (comparatively) state. So how is he suitable to control big country like India?
Re: Extrimists fellass note down this point!!!
by Common Sense on Mar 23, 2013 02:28 AM
Read the article again. Nowhere does the author suggest that Modi be given a fair chance at PM ship...
The whole article is about Wharton's ridiculous flip flop. The author is making a genuine point in defending Modi when it comes to Wharton cancelling their invite based on falsified alligations against Modi.
Re: Extrimists fellass note down this point!!!
by Common Sense on Mar 23, 2013 02:28 AM
Read the article again. Nowhere does the author suggest that Modi be given a fair chance at PM ship...
The whole article is about Wharton's ridiculous flip flop. The author is making a genuine point in defending Modi when it comes to Wharton cancelling their invite based on falsified alligations against Modi.
Re: Re: Re: Extrimists fellass note down this point!!!
by National Highway on Mar 23, 2013 06:55 PM
It is nothing but foolishness to think that only one particular religion hate NM/BJP. If it were the case, why BJP has no presence in Southern and Eastern part of India, which are Hindu majority. NM is part of BJP, which feeds on religion and religion tensions. So the majority in India will never vote to BJP.
While Modi may not admit it, the fact remains that in March 2002 he had been barely in the saddle for six months and had not come to grips with teh state administration. It is noteworthy that he had held no office before this and had no administrative experience.
If the killer cud not hv controled the riots for inexpreienced then how do you extrimists ppls dreaming the killer become PM,even he has not any exprience in centre body of BJP or previous BJP guv????Kindly explain!!!
Re: Extrimists fellass note down this point!!!
by Common Sense on Mar 23, 2013 02:29 AM
Abdullah: Read the article again. Nowhere does the author suggest that Modi be given a fair chance at PM ship...
The whole article is about Wharton's ridiculous flip flop. The author is making a genuine point in defending Modi when it comes to Wharton cancelling their invite based on falsified alligations against Modi.
Re: Re: Extrimists fellass note down this point!!!
by National Highway on Mar 23, 2013 06:57 PM
The article says NM may be not involved in the riots but incompetent in controlling them in a tiny (comparatively) state. So how is he suitable to control big country like India?
Not at all surprising - how we support or degrade any one we want to. Even after more than one DECADE and many legal cases in the courts of the Nation - not a single court has judged against Mr Modi - yet half of India is dead sure of his crimes! and the other half is as sure of his Innosense! Have we Indians really become so much COCK-EYED that we just cant see anything in its natural colours? do we have to colour everything as per our perceptions? Because we Indians are so Colour-Blind - these politicians take us for a ride..and we just keep quarreling with each other. If Mr Modi is a CRIMINAL as put out by our Central Government - hasnt this very central Government made it amply clear that A criminal is ruling a state for the past so many years and this central Government is UNABLE to save the public and put a MURDERER behind Bars? - In my Opinion the Central Government and all its cronies are only LOUDLY shouting out - How INEFFICIENT they are! and in case Mr Modi is not wrong, then why have you wasted 12 important years shouting against him - and not having done anything yourselves?
Re: WE INDIANS
by National Highway on Mar 23, 2013 06:59 PM
NM may be good but he is part of BJP, which feeds on religion and regional tensions. Because of BJP, NM never will become PM.
