Discussion Board

EXPLAINED: Why India voted against Sri Lanka at UNHRC


Total 385 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
anand van
Banana Government.......
by anand van on Mar 23, 2012 10:37 AM

From roll back of rail fare to the voting against Srilanka shows poor governance.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
JSK
No support to terririst
by JSK on Mar 23, 2012 10:34 AM

We shud not support terrorist groups. LTTE had created problem in Lanka. now it is peceful. India shud have not voted agt Lanka

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Trend setter
wil
by Trend setter on Mar 23, 2012 10:34 AM  | Hide replies

Wil we allow a similar resolution against us for the human rights abuse by the indian army in kashmir, NE and tribal areas?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
AAMEC CHEMINEER
Re: wil
by AAMEC CHEMINEER on Mar 23, 2012 11:17 AM
As a citizen of India, I will allow similiar resoultion if there is human rights abuse in any part of the nation. Never compare foolishly the genocide held by Srilanka with our defensive acts.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Trend setter
Re: Re: wil
by Trend setter on Mar 23, 2012 11:34 AM
U b.l.oody tamil, go to lanka and get treated by rajapakse. Dont advise us.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Tahassamewilliangink
@aravam buster
by Tahassamewilliangink on Mar 23, 2012 10:30 AM

Have you gone to UP, MP, BIHAR?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Tahassamewilliangink
@aravam buster
by Tahassamewilliangink on Mar 23, 2012 10:28 AM

are you from north?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Siachen
India should have voted against.....
by Siachen on Mar 23, 2012 10:25 AM  | Hide replies

India should not have voted against the resolution.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Tahassamewilliangink
Re: India should have voted against.....
by Tahassamewilliangink on Mar 23, 2012 10:31 AM
wat u trying to say?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Golden
Re: Re: India should have voted against.....
by Golden on Mar 23, 2012 10:36 AM
he is trying to say that uskigulami is a dangerous idea. it is self destructing..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
SivaSankaran Sarma
Re: India should have voted against.....
by SivaSankaran Sarma on Mar 23, 2012 10:36 AM
YEs you would love them to aid and abet the Sinhalese to kill and commit genocide on the indigenous Tamils. That would have cooled and soothed your anti Tamil heart. However you would have been howling and crying for Indian to take action against the Fijian government as they are illtrating the immigrant Hindians. One rule for yo and another for other whom you do not like. These are good example as to why we should end Hindian domination. Ind ais not Hindia. We Tamil are India;s oldest people adn speak its oldest and only livign classical language adn our views and feelings should be respected.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Golden
Re: Re: India should have voted against.....
by Golden on Mar 23, 2012 10:38 AM
do you love keeling of innocent muslims and helpless people. if no then get ready for a vote against you also...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anand van
Re: Re: India should have voted against.....
by anand van on Mar 23, 2012 10:43 AM
Tamilan find fault with everyone under the illusion created by their selfish leaders.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ArunKumar Duraisamy
Re: Re: Re: India should have voted against.....
by ArunKumar Duraisamy on Mar 23, 2012 06:34 PM
Here come the new fault finder.
KNow this Anand Van.
When Pujabis, gujus and muslims eventhough are born and bred in a different country the govt still support them when there is an issue. India is goverened by spineless and very very corrup politicians. Shame on the Indians cannot back people of own ehinicity. Its better TN becomes separate country. I can forsee Indias future as Bangladesh taking over india border and 800million illeterate muz from pakis will penetrate porus borders and f**K u* all indians. This is defnitely gonna happen in next 10 years. Indian intelligence is joke and waste of time coz eveytime US has to pin point someone is going to plant a bom* and still so called indians would do nothing. Look at Kesabs case and wasted crores. I have no clue why Hinid became a national language, its actually urudu called in a different name!!! just coz UP was full on MUZ and spoke urudu this became national language complete non-sense to us. All the PM are elected from UP with full majority and still the state has no toilets!!! think if a country is run by dumb A*S and still want very old civilization to follow it. Building temple for English shows indian still prefer to be slave of british, Mark my words INDIA WILL BE ALWAYS BE A SLAVE in this aspect. Its better TN come out separate and better run by people with SPINES, atlease we can save our A*S rather licking someones A*S.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Samir Bhagwat
Re: Re: Re: India should have voted against.....
by Samir Bhagwat on Mar 23, 2012 10:55 AM
tamilians should have fought for their independence at the time of end of british rule. they should have aligned with the West and China now it is too late.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pkr ramesh
Re: Re: India should have voted against.....
by pkr ramesh on Mar 23, 2012 11:27 AM
When LTTE was killing tamils and violating all human rights where were you and your tamil empathy and sympathy? Mr Sarma

   Forward   |   Report abuse
karthi d
Re: Re: Re: India should have voted against.....
by karthi d on Mar 23, 2012 11:32 AM
The issue here is whether the Lanka govt is following its words...all know even LTTE is bad. why Lanka govt still run 100s of refugee camp and keep the people..what about the equal rights in civil and law etc are the problem. it is more that 3 years after war...this what India govt asks

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pkr ramesh
Re: Re: Re: Re: India should have voted against.....
by pkr ramesh on Mar 23, 2012 11:44 AM
Look Mr Karthi it is not our business how long people are kept in camps.What about Kasmiri pandits Mr Karhi How long they have been in camps? I agree camps are bad but that is where our focus should have been cajole SL govt to resettle Tamils Instead we are creating more harm to the Tamils.OK now we have voted,what next,What do you do if SL govt keeps thhem in camps for a long long time See we are helpless,instead tamil parties in TN should have gone aggressive on resettling tamils.No army in the world is free of human rights violation including LTTE

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Ngemu Ngampong
misc
by Ngemu Ngampong on Mar 23, 2012 10:24 AM

We,Indian leaders hav voted for and against many resolutions and policies.Which policy(s) hav been successful and pro-people.Whatever has been done shall be dumbed in the dust. 2020 will decide d result.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Opinions
UPA aka United Parties of America
by Opinions on Mar 23, 2012 10:19 AM  | Hide replies

USA: Turn Left
UPA: Yes sir

USA: Turn Right
UPA: Yes sir

USA: U-Turn
UPA: Yes sir

USA: Attaaaaayntion
UPA: Yeeeeeeees sir

USA: Spread your legs
UPA: Yes sir

USA: Bend Ooooover
UPA: Yeeeees sir

(Bang Bang Chiti Bang Bang, Bang Bang Chiti Chiti Bang Bang Bang Bang)

USA: Disssssmiss
UPA: Yeeeeees sir

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Golden
Re: UPA aka United Parties of America
by Golden on Mar 23, 2012 10:40 AM
it should be like:
-------------------

USA: Turn Left
IND: Yes sir

USA: Turn Right
IND: Yes sir

USA: U-Turn
IND: Yes sir

USA: Attaaaaayntion
IND: Yeeeeeeees sir

USA: Spread your legs
IND: Yes sir

USA: Bend Ooooover
IND: Yeeeees sir

(Bang Bang Chiti Bang Bang, Bang Bang Chiti Chiti Bang Bang Bang Bang)

USA: Disssssmiss
IND: Yeeeeees sir

that's why they named itloudia..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Lucky B
Truth
by Lucky B on Mar 23, 2012 10:14 AM

Soon we will see convert Shri Lanka, on the name of assistance to human rights problem.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 385 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message