Re: @siva kumar - Come out with your real fakirName!!
by siva kumar on Mar 23, 2012 01:21 PM
Good joke .... i told you that you are saying "they are not indians"
then why should we care about it
My question is clear "then why you are using the Oil"
Re: Re: Re: @siva kumar - Come out with your real fakirName!!
by siva kumar on Mar 23, 2012 01:27 PM
I lived in noth india too ,they never talked to me like you thinks.... you are dragging with Nazik discussion....
better be an indian first,then you can become an hindu...
Re: @gac
by siva kumar on Mar 23, 2012 01:06 PM
Well said,,, I am not sure why he(opinions) is making a bridge between hindu killing and srilankan tamilian killing...
Re: @gac
by gac on Mar 23, 2012 01:20 PM
what you are saying is true about slaves been migrated to srilanka during british rule and also if you have ever read your history books you wouldve also known srilanka was ruled by all modern day south india kingdoms chera, chola, pandya and pallava kingdoms have ruled srilanka. 2. if MK wants to wave his anything as long as has one thats his right and if someone is supporting someone for a tamil plight i dont find its illeagal or something wrong that dosnt mean they are asking for autonomy
Re: @gac
by LAKSHMINARAYANAN narayanan on Mar 23, 2012 05:03 PM
I think you dont know about reality. There are two kinds of Tamils in Srilanka, one who came there during pre historic times i.e 4th century BC, along with occupation forces of Tamil Kings Cholas,Pallavas and Pandian. The other group went as plantation workers during British Period. Even the Sinhalese also came from our Country. They are Bengalis and Oriyas
Re: Re: @gac
by SivaSankaran Sarma on Mar 23, 2012 06:56 PM
They in rality are largely descended from the indigenous Tamils who coverted to Buddhism and the later Indian Tamils. The Bengali/Oriya blood in them is only aroudn 25%.However they choose to highlight this and ignore the 70% Tamil DNA in them. Around 50% of the present day Sinhalese are purely desceded from recentl Indian Tamil immigrants, who only migrated to the island a few centuries ago. They belong to certain cstes that makes up around 50% of the present day Sinhalese. Their aristocaracy is purely of Indian Tamil or Telugu origin. Most of these low country and coastal Sinhalese incuding the ones around Colombo Galle Matare Hmabatota etc are largely descended from these recently Sinhalised Indian Tamils. The so called Sinhalese population in the Catholic belt just North of Colombo to the coast of Puttlam only took on a Sinhalese identity very recently some 100 to 60 years ago. It is only in the interior you largely get these original Sinhalese a mixtue of the indigenous Tamil tribes that converted to Buddhism and the Bengali/Oriyan immigrants. Even the indigenous Eelam Tamils have this Bengali/Oriyan immgrant bllod in their genes. This proves that prior to the arrival of Buddhism the Indigenous Eelam Tamils and orginal Sinhalese were one and the same people speaking Tamil or semi Tamil dialects.
Re: @gac
by ArunKumar Duraisamy on Mar 23, 2012 06:26 PM
I cannot agree with this, why when Pujabis, gujus and muslims eventhough are born and bred in a different country the govt still support them when there is an issue. India is goverened by spineless and very very corrup politicians. Shame on the Indians cannot back people of own ehinicity. Its better TN becomes separate country. I can forsee Indias future as Bangladesh taking over india border and 800million illeterate muz from pakis will penetrate porus borders and f**K u* all indians. This is defnitely gonna happen in next 10 years. Indian intelligence is joke and waste of time coz eveytime US has to pin point someone is going to plant a bom* and still so called indians would do nothing. Look at Kesabs case and wasted crores. I have no clue why Hinid became a national language, its actually urudu called in a different name!!! just coz UP was full on MUZ and spoke urudu this became national language complete non-sense to us. All the PM are elected from UP with full majority and still the state has no toilets!!! think if a country is run by dumb A*S and still want very old civilization to follow it. Building temple for English shows indian still prefer to be slave of british, Mark my words INDIA WILL BE ALWAYS BE A SLAVE in this aspect. Its better TN come out separate and better run by people with SPINES, atlease we can save our A*S rather licking someones A*S.
Re: @gac
by SivaSankaran Sarma on Mar 23, 2012 06:46 PM
Stop lying The vast majoirty of the Tamil population in the island is indigenous and have nothing to do with India. The Indian origin estate Tamils have norhing to do with this war. It is between the indigenous Eelam Tamil hailing from the North and east of the island and the Sinhalese. You are a lying Sinhalese racist. Trying to mislead and change history. So the Tamil Jaffna kingdon and the eastern Tamil chiefdomes were all figements of imagination. Yes you will say that too as the governmet has now erased the history of the Tamil Jaffna kingdom from all history books and is now destroying all traces of the Jaffna kingdom. It is the Sinhalese who are largely descended from Indian immigrants. 25% from Bengal/Orissa and the rest of them from Tamilnadu/Kerala. Around 50% of the present day so called Sinhalese are purely descended from Indian Tamil immigrants who migrated to the island within the last 500 years and took on a Sinhalese identity. They belong to certain Sinhalese castes which now make up around 50% of the present day Sinhalese population. The Sinhalee aristocracy is purely of South Indian origin largely Tamil then Telugu. This is the reason the Kandyan convention signed in 1815 giving away the kingdom of Kandy to the British is largely sigend in Tamil as the mother tongue of the Sinhalese aristocrcy was Tamil. enetic analysis of the Sinhalese show that they are largely of Tamil descent 70% DNA common with Indian Tamil and only 25% DNA fron Bengal/Orissa.
Re: @gac
by yeda peda on Mar 23, 2012 12:53 PM
The actual issue is human rights..Nothing else.. I am not against shri lanka..But they can do somethign to put the culprits in bars..
Re: @gac
by gac on Mar 23, 2012 12:57 PM
are you in school right now? dont you even understand that innocent civilian means that they dont have any direct connection or involved with the conflict
Re: @gac
by gac on Mar 23, 2012 12:52 PM
for your info tamilans have migrated to malaysia and singapore, unlike in india and srilanka. no one asked asked for autonomy in malaysia or in srilanka. infact tamil is a national language in both these countries. have your facts right before coming to a public forum.
Re: Re: @opinion
by siva kumar on Mar 23, 2012 12:49 PM
boss,why do you mix up hindu vs other religion here I lives in velankani ,where we live to gethte with Nagore and thanjvaur people as brothers
what you want?I agreed alreay that those killings to be stopped.
are you ready to accept this killing to be stopped?
Tamil politicians from India like MK and vaiko ahve stoked tamil supremacist feelings for votebank sake time to time and are responsible fro the mess of lankan tamils to some extent.
