Read the Justice Bhargava committee report, which is proof that Andhra@ illegally used Telangana tax money in Andhra when Telangana was very much backward than Andhra.
This is chunk of ice burgh about how Andhra@ used Telangana money for there development, leaving Telangana behind.
Re: Proof that Andhr@ used Telangana money in Andhra illegally
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 10:44 PM
During merger Telangana has Electricity for 6 towns only now it's 100%. Roads are 635 kms only in all hyderabad state ..now it's 35,000 kms. Literacy is just 9% ...and now it's 56% which is equal to seemandhra region. Irrigation land increased upto 235% in Telangana as compared to 78% in andhra region and 11% in seema.
Re: Proof that Andhr@ used Telangana money in Andhra illegally
by Siripuram Chinnodu on Aug 22, 2010 12:02 AM
wow.. kallu teripinchav kadha! btw, where is ice burgh? near pittsburgh?
Re: Proof that Andhr@ used Telangana money in Andhra illegally
by panuganti prasad on Aug 21, 2010 06:43 PM
@Green U definetley need an Icecream my boy grow up...!
Re: Proof that Andhr@ used Telangana money in Andhra illegally
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 10:37 PM
Get a recent report first . leave history in books. check for the money spent upto 2010
Re: Re: Proof that Andhr@ used Telangana money in Andhra illegall
by suresh chandra on Aug 22, 2010 05:15 PM
get the report submitted by the union minister recently. 9 out of 10 telangana districts are under developed. If YOUR figures are right, then why are you worried? publish them.
Re: Proof that Andhr@ used Telangana money in Andhra illegally
by andhrarulez on Aug 20, 2010 10:43 PM
Did Justice Bhargava said that(in his words) , or you are interpreting the report? Please clarify Because i read the report completely never found anything like what u r claiming.
Re: Re: Proof that Andhr@ used Telangana money in Andhra illegall
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 10:46 PM
Actually he never read or know about that report.. 99% of these ProT guys have a script prepared by kodandaram and Jayashankar. they will tell or argument with those scripted topics... outside those topics....they will get confused ...so never ask such questions
After Independence India was doing well with mixed culture. At that time Andhra was the one who started linguestic feelings all over the country, because of them central has to divide country to several pices.
When there is no reason for Andhras to divide from Madras (other than language), now they refuse the same for some one else.....double standards...
Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many states
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 08:42 PM
For that they needed SRC .... with Linguistic basis. Now what will be the basis . Central government shud initiate a SRC with a particular basis . than it will be ok for mergers or divisions . Divisions shud not be made on personal feelings or fake facts. or else it will be danger to integrity of India.
Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many states
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 08:54 PM
For your information Andhra State was not created on Lingustic basis, SRC was not involved in Andhra State formation.
Andhra state is the reason for central to create SRC to divide country on lingustic basis. But for Andhra State formation there is no criteria.
Please check your history books.
By the way on what basis BJP created new states a decade ago? It is not compulsary to have SRC for de-merging.
SRC is for states creation, but we are asking not the division, we are asking for the de-merging.
Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many states
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 09:10 PM
SRC is not mandotory for merger or demerger ..fyi . But it is needed becoz it is good to have it to save indian integrity ... or else every other idiot raises from bed and demand separate state showing a sentiment of the locals
Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many states
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 09:08 PM
I bet you are making a fool of yourself with this half knowledge ... Please go away and bring someone who know history as it is
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 09:50 PM
As long as you call andhra people as looters or cheaters they are not going to allow division. they are not going to leave with such titles ... people like you already spoiled the already declared division. The more you blame the difficult it becomes. No government is going to take a decision aginst 80 million people.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many st
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 10:11 PM
Well, andhra@ are very good at changing history.
They successfully made an impression to all Telangana people that Potti Sriramulu died for all telugu speaking people and all Indians including Telangana got independence in 1947.
Greate going buddy, keep changing history. Deney the history which is against to you.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 10:25 PM
1. Telangana was a state before creation of AP. 2. Hyderabad was created with the sweat and blood of telangana people. Are they truths or changing history?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 10:13 PM
What you say are just allegations and already proved wrong ... Your own KCR or chenna reddy did much harm than andhra people. anyway people like you who do false allegations are making all of seemandhra people unite and fight against separation. Ordinary people in seemandhra area are not interested in separation initially ... your false allegations made them go against you and your demands. or else Jai andhra movement wud've been stronger like in 1972. Now UAP people sud thank you and especially KCR for making everyone go UAP
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 10:29 PM
seemandra people united?/ what a laughable statement.
One guy want saperate andhra, other one want saperate seema, and some other one want rayala telangan, other guy want uttarandra with few districts from orissa. and this is call united. great
May be you are forgetting one thing before you seemandra mass resignations, TRS never had that much support, even there are less number of T supports, now you see the recent election results.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 10:35 PM
I think you never see news.... or else you wud've known that every common man in seemandhra region told the want UAP continued and no separation . coming to the leaders ... it's to make confusion . Every seemandhra leader resigned on dec 10th .... can you T leaders do it ? every politician in T region are playing games ... they will confuse u until u forget what you are fighting for. actually you are getting fooled there and here too
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 10:12 PM
What you say are just allegations and already proved wrong ... Your own KCR or chenna reddy did much harm than andhra people. anyway people like you who do false allegations are making all of seemandhra people unite and fight against separation. Ordinary people in seemandhra area are not interested in separation initially ... your false allegations made them go against you and your demands. or else Jai andhra movement wud've been stronger like in 1972. Now UAP people sud thank you and especially KCR for making everyone go UAP
Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many states
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 09:06 PM
You are impossible to convince ... and you are completely ignorant . In December 1953, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru appointed the States Reorganization Commission to prepare for the creation of states on linguistic lines. This was headed by Justice Fazal Ali and the commission itself was also known as the Fazal Ali Commission. The efforts of this commission were overseen by Govind Ballabh Pant, who served as Home Minister from December 1954. The commission created a report in 1955 recommending the reorganisation of India's states. Para 386 of States Reorganization Commission Report (SRC) said "After taking all these factors into consideration we have come to the conclusions that it will be in the interests of Andhra as well as Telangana area is to constitute into a separate State, which may be known as the Hyderabad State with provision for its unification with Andhra after the general elections likely to be held in or about 1961 if by a two thirds majority the legislature of the residency Hyderabad State expresses itself in favor of such unification."
The central government decided to ignore the SRC recommendations and established unified Andhra Pradesh on November 1, 1956.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many st
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 09:21 PM
This is called half knowledge. I was talking about Andhra state(not Andhra pradesh) which is created without SRC. Please go back to schools and learn how to read books.
I have no arguments about SRC or Andhra Pradesh formation.
All I am saying is Andhra State formation is the reason central created SRC and started the process of creating lingustic states. Before that central is not interested to create new states.
So when Andhra is created without any criteria(just because they asked), why dont you accept the same for Telangana?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 09:33 PM
Linguistic basis. On the basis of an agitation, on October 1, 1953, 11 districts in the Telugu-speaking portion of Madras State voted to become the new state of Andhra State with Kurnool as the capital. Andhra Kesari Tanguturi Prakasam Pantulu became first Chief Minister of thus formed Telugu State. Thus, Andhra State was a state created in India on October 1, 1953 from the Telugu-speaking northern districts of Madras Presidency. It comprised Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema Regions.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 09:26 PM
So ...on what basis you are asking a separate state ??? You are not telling anything for that question.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 10:17 PM
If you don't have problem with AP formation, don't you think you need better reasons before breaking it. SeemaAndhra region of AP was part of Madras state due to the agreement between Niazm and British wehereas AP created by ourselves. So you need more convening reasons for breaking it. Also, Hyderabad could ask for an UT status for the same reasons that you are using for a separate state.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 09:40 PM
Hyderabad culture is lot different from Telangana culture .. so it shud be divided ... Nalgonda culture have many differences with Adilabad culture what abt it ? On blood sucking question ... i don't have to go very far distance ... just read today's news paper . Gudisela venkataswamy and many TRS cadre occupied Hero srikanths land ... any explanation from u besides counter attacking ??? what about the blood sucker KCR who earned 2000 crores which incldes 2 ships and a own port in gujarat ?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 10:09 PM
Well see the news correctly, Srikanth clearly mentions that TRS is not involved in that. I dont speak for KCR as I dont support him. All politicians are like that YSR, CBN even Rajiv Gandhi(Boforce) are not different from KCR in looting public money.
I dont know how Andhra@ quickly comes to conslution that every Telangan supporter is a KCR fan or follower. Well I am not that...
As per your cultur argume, Tamil is not all different Telugu, it sounds same, similar words and both languages are dirived from sanskrit. So Andhra should merge back with Madras. Thanks for opening my eyes.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India spli
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 10:24 PM
Good to know that your eyes are closed until now... It is not too late to open your eyes and see the real world. Andhra shud be merged with Madras. what next ? and as Nizam wished you shud be merged with pakistan ...right ?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India spli
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 10:17 PM
i bet you never heard or saw tamil. and what language do you speak. not accent ...i asked language. you are making yourself a fool again. I think you need to see the news again ...there are TRS candidates and TRS flags in srikanths land
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 10:24 PM
are TRS candidates and TRS flags in srikanths land and Srikantha says there is no TRS involvement, only KaKa is involved.
Anyway TRS is not my problem, my problem is Andhra.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 10:03 PM
Your blood is sucked by the politicians in your region. So try to rectify this instead of blaming others. Bell bottom pants and hippy hair style were popular in 70's but we look stupid if we imitate them now. Similarly, blindly imitating something happened in 50's without basis look silly.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 10:13 PM
Yup, I understand you. It was convinent to you in 1950 so you support it. Now it is not your interest now, so deney it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India spli
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 10:46 PM
So on the basis your argument, are you supporting kashimiri separatists demand for a state? India got independence from British in 1947 but how conveniently it is denying independence to Kashmir now.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 10:26 PM
Better reason, have you thought the same when you breaking the Madras state? which headed breaking country into several pieces?
I dont need your lecture about SRC or AP formation.
All I am saying is for silly reason Andhra separated from Madras, which ignated lingustic feelings all over country and contry divided into several states. If you have any problem with this you can disucss.
Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many states
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 08:49 PM
So according to your logic, India got independence from British, so it shouldn't say no if any state want to be separated. British divided India for their administrative convenience but not for the people convenience. After independence, India adopted democracy and not communism, so only way a common man without any education (literacy rate was in single digit at that time) could participate in government activities was through oral communication. India successfully established stable and viable democracy by reorganising the states (at least in South) on the basis of language. On this basis, SeemaAndhra was separated (and Kerala) from Madras state. Once communism and bell bottom pants were in fashion but there are out of fashion now. Similarly, the concept used for the separation in 1950 may be appropriate for that era but may look odd if we try to imitate or extend it in the 21st century. Also do you support, if one region of Tamilinadu want to form a separate state? Our Central home minster said, he would not entertain the request for separation of tamilnadu and nip it in the bud.
Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many states
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 08:57 PM
You got the wrong history, till the Andhra saperation movement, central has no intension of dividing the states. And for your convience you can ask for saperation but it is sin for Telangana to ask for de-merging. Great going buddy.....
Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many states
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 09:07 PM
Nobody is saying it is sin to ask for a new state but asking the separation based on a pack is the problem. It looks like you also got the wrong history. Telangana was part of hyderabad state, which had 8 more districts (3 kannada and 5 martha) and if you demerge it will become state-less unless you are going to revive hyderabad state.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into many st
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 09:24 PM
Well , hats off to your knowledge.
If you refer to first SRC, when they said Telangana, they didnt meane all other districts which are merged into Karnataka and Maharastra. As per SRC regardless of Andhra/Telangana merge or not, they wanted non-telangana districts to go away. Thus after they taken out those districts , the only part left is Telangana and they merged it to Andhra.
We want to implement first SRC recommandations. Not the merging.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Andhra was the reason, India splited into man
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 09:33 PM
Hyderabad state was divided into 3 parts and merged them with 3 states based on the language spoken in those parts. Do you think, kannada and martha regions would go empty handed and leaving hyderabad if they know telangana region is going to be state and not merging with Andhra.
Re: Lets speak truth
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 08:11 PM
So ??? Central govt. announced 250 backward districts . more to come . you want all the backward districts to be separated ??? 3 out of 4 Rayalaseema districts are backward ... MIM also wants rayalatelangana ... so it is agreeable to you ??
and in what way your corrupted politicians going to help in getting developed after separation.
Re: Re: Lets speak truth
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 08:16 PM
It is not just about backward. Telangana has enough resources, if we are allowed to use our resources without Andhra@ intervension then we are sure we will out of backward districts soon.
Where Rayalaseema is lacking in resources.
If you want to talk about MIM then you should talk about your Jai Andhra leaders too who want Andhra saperated from Telangana
Re: Re: Re: Lets speak truth
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 08:22 PM
Do you know how much worth of Iron ore available in Seema ??? who said they are short of resources ??? what resources does T have ??? are there any gold mine or diamond mines ??? water which is at a very low level which needs huge power supply to get it up. Cheap B-grade coal which can be useful in AP only becouse it reduces transport cost ? I bet it has huge resources of useless fanatics
Re: Re: Re: Re: Lets speak truth
by suresh chandra on Aug 22, 2010 05:32 PM
your forefathers migrated here and looted our resources. What kind of resources do you think you ANDHRAITES have large body of sea water which even poor creatures would not drink, large body of land in konaseema where there is flood every year and we TELANGANA people contribute our resources to rehabilitate your lot. and yes, PEDDAPURAM is your every BIG resource. If you have resources, run your VIJAYAWADA thermal plant without our "2nd grade" coal, irrigate your lands without water that we are allowing you to use even after large extent of our fertile lands were submerged in Srisailam and nagarjuna sagar dam. yes! you had great "resources" when you separated from TN. capital city with offices under tents and hordes of hungry "literate" people to fall as parasites on TELANGANA resourses. mind you we were a surplus economy when HYDERABAD state wa formed.
AP division is not possible till share of river waters and opportunities i.e. private and govt jobs, govt grants and loans, electricity, schools, colleges, universities, hospitals, industries, taxes, since 1953 of 10 million ppl are decided.
To everyone who is referring wikipedia pages ... there is no use of it. It is a site with User pages only and never a reliable source. Even you can write 100 pages full of lies and make us believe it's truth. If you want to refer ...refer a govt. site or something reliable . Don't make yourself foolish with wikipedia references
Re: No need of wikipedia references
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 07:57 PM
Well, why dont you check the sources from where wikipedia is getting that info? Most of the times they get info from realiable sources like news papers, library books, govt. released documents.
Re: Re: No need of wikipedia references
by panuganti prasad on Aug 21, 2010 04:14 PM
70% employees in Hyderabad elecrtonic and print media are from North Telengana Region dear so u will naturally get this selfcreated info.
Re: Re: No need of wikipedia references
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 08:01 PM
Wikipedia clearly says on its website about the information on Telangana that "its neutrality is disputed".
Re: Re: No need of wikipedia references
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 08:04 PM
I clearly told wikipedia won't publish anything ....only the users do . It can refer andhra jyothy news ....but the news in sakshi is quite opposite. or vice versa. you will believe the news whichever you like. wikipedia news is filled with such references. if you want you can believe that
As per central panchayat raj, rural development identified 9 out of 10 districts in HYD are backward. If you have any problems with it then talk to Central govt. (see the link 138 in Wikipedia:Telangana)
Andhra Pradesh is contemplating to seek the Central Government’s approval for inclusion of three more districts in the State in the list of areas declared as naxal-affected.
These districts are Srikakulam, Vizianagaram and Visakhapatnam in north Coastal Andhra bordering Orissa. At present, Khammam is the only district in Andhra Pradesh that finds place in the list of 33 districts across the country which have been declared as extremist-affected. So now seemandra tops the naxal effected area than Telangana.
Telangana is the largest single region of the three regions of Andhra Pradesh state covering 41.47% of its total area, is inhabited by 40.54% of the state’s population, contributes about 76% to the state’s revenues (excluding central government contribution). From Central govt: 19.86%, From Telangana: 61.47% (including 37.17% from Hyderabad), From Andhra: 14.71, From Rayalaseema: 3.90%. (from Wikipedia), even though you take out HYD revenue, Telangana tops the revenue than Seemandra.
But still you Andhra ignorants keep say, telangana didnt contribute to HYD, over run by naxal, and Telangana is well developed.
Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are backward
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 07:31 PM
To everyone who is referring wikipedia pages ... there is no use of it. It is a site with User pages only and never a reliable source. Even you can write 100 pages full of lies and make us believe it's truth. If you want to refer ...refer a govt. site or something reliable . Don't make yourself foolish with wikipedia references
Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are back
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 07:37 PM
Well then you can check Panchayat Raj Central govt site for backward districts list. Dont be too smart, wikipedia even provided with the links from where they got that info. And I know you guys, what every against you, you simply reject. Thats why I ended my previous post saying you are all ignorants.
Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 07:45 PM
and i found how smart you are acting when you said T revenue is 70% . Even that fake prof. Jayashankar didn't dare to say that huge lie
Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 07:42 PM
I think you didn't followed the news later on .... those references wer from 2006 and that report is sent by YSR to get more funds from center to Telangana . That was not from central govt. actually. srikakulam is backward than any district in AP ... but it was not in that list . TRS already shut down on that issue when they know this truth ... now why you raise it again ??? you thought people who are here are ignorant of the news ?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 07:46 PM
So, if I buy your argument then in 2006, there are nine districts are backward out of ten. This still suites my argument.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts i
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 08:03 PM
Backward districts are identified by many factors, just because Karimnagar is highest in paddy prducing, it doesnt mean it is well developed.
If you dont agree, then please complain to central govt. to remove karimnagar from list, good luck.
A dead man can not talk, so you can safely say YSR sent the report to benifit Telangana, huh...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts i
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 07:55 PM
and you are ignoring the fact that YSR sent the report to benefit Telangana and ignored backward andhra districts deliberately. Karimnagar have been highest paddy producer , better than godavari districts . inclusion in backward district is a joke. you deliberately ignore that
Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are backward
by Chandra Paul on Aug 20, 2010 07:31 PM
if the revenue is much better than Seemandhra and Rayalaseema, how can one declare 9 out of 10 districts as backward. In that case all other districts are in much worst situation. why the cry for separate states.
Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are back
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 07:39 PM
That is what you are not able to understand. We have higher revenu tax generated but still less spending. As per Gentleman agreement, if state govt. spending tax revenue in Telangana (which collected in Telangana) then we would have developed more.
Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 07:59 PM
So how do you pay taxes ??? when you earn more you pay taxes more . is that right. Telangana people are very rich and paying more taxes right ? or you people are drinking too much and paying taxes that way ? your statements are self contradicting
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts i
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 08:33 PM
Nice analogy, but still I don't understand how telangana is contributing 24.3% (61.47-37.17% from Hyderabad) of the state revenue?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts i
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 08:34 PM
you ignorant fool .... you didn't know the fact that when there is a merger most of the T income is from excise . if you don't know that go to some library to find that or ask that poramboku jayashankar. And i understand that you don't know the fact that Nizam has given seemandhra regions to British for lease . he got around 9 crores in the beginning and later 20 crores every year ...which is huge amount in those days. He became rich with that money . not with ur taxes. go find that in wikipedia. for your info British refuse to take Telangana region since there are no resources. yadikelli vastharu ra baboo meerantha .... half knowledge gallu
Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are backward
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 07:25 PM
5 districts of Telangana were added to the list due to left wing extremism (please read the whole report before making your comments) List of Telangana districts which are affected by naxalism are 1.Karimnagar 2.Khammam 3.Medak 4.Nalgonda 5.Nizamabad. (Please check Annex-2 of the report, page 23). According to the report, only 3 districts, (Adilabad, Warangal and Mahbubnagar) in Telangana and 2 districts (Vizianagaram and Chittoor) in rest of AP are backward. Interestingly all the districts in AP infested with naxals are in Telangana.
Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are back
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 07:41 PM
May I know from where you get this naxal info and backward districts info? I got from panchayat raj website.
Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 07:54 PM
At the following pbplanning1gov1in2pdf2rsvy2pdf (replace 1 with . and 2 with /)
Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are backward
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 07:25 PM
I can write upa page in Wikipedia saying that Telangana contributes 0% and taking 90% of AP revenues.... since it is in wikipedia ...what i said can be correct ??? . Wikipedia is never a reliable source. Go to some innocent Telangana kid and tell ur stories abt wikipedia You people say Telangana is backward but you contributed 70% ??? how is that possible... when there is income you pay taxes. that's where the revenue comes. which one is correct ??? your backwardness or you had gr8 income and paying huge taxes . here is the fact for the educated illiterates in Telangana ...u can refer this in assembly library. You can't change the facts like in wikipedia Telangana revenue is about 52-53 % in which 40 - 41% is from Hyderabad. Obviously 99% of Hyderabad revenue is generated by Non-Telanganites. Usually ProT's math will be like ...they will say Telangana revenue is 52% (including Hyderabad) and they spend 35% only(excluding Hyderabad). Funny part is they do such maths with SKC ...and they strongly believe SKC can't find their tactics. They will know that when SKC report it to Central govt.
Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are back
by Green Star on Aug 20, 2010 07:44 PM
one rule, deny if it is not support to your argument. why dont you check the wikipedia to see from where they got that info? They got this revenue info from Andhrajyothi news paper, where AndhraJyothi got that info from State Assumbly reports.
If you are right about wikipedia, then good luck changing that saying 0% revenue from telangana.
I know you all crying to death to leave a cash cow(Telangana)
Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 07:51 PM
Then good luck with wikipedia references... you and other TRS chamcha's can believe it..while the rest of the world is laughing at your ignorance. as per your references If Telangana is backward and how can you say it's a cash cow ???
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts i
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 08:16 PM
as expected you ProT idiots conclude with a blind statement about andhra looting . There is no thing called looting in democracy . You need to grow up to understand this . That word will be useful when communists comes to power in India. keep it handy until then
Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are
by panuganti prasad on Aug 21, 2010 04:25 PM
Andhra Jyothi MD is from from North Telengana so as his maximum employees who always write Trash with out much authenticity. It is a Blackmailing paper all the time. What ever u 'T' people could find little employement with ur incompetency u will find it only in this unethical and corrupt Media.
Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are back
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 07:31 PM
You are right about Wikipedia. Also Wikipedia says on its website about the information on Telangana that "its neutrality is disputed".
Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts in T are
by Thunder murthy on Aug 20, 2010 07:37 PM
I never ever tried to go wikipedia for any political references . I know it is only user posted and never reliable. Only some ignorant kids do that
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Central Govt declared 9 out of 10 districts i
by National Highway on Aug 20, 2010 08:39 PM
Until now you are argued logically, but lost logic and using generic word 'looting' by citing examples that are 40 years old.
Beware of the Telanaga. He hates you from the core of his heart. You are a cheater, looter,exploiter etc . But he will still come to you with an innocent face,hiding his real feelings , for a job. Yes, he will abuse , curse and intimidate you. But he will still come to you for a job. There are three reasons. One , he has no self respect. Two ,Telangas who have some money would set up a wine shop, rather than an Industry,Hospital,studio,Bank etc. Three ,he has been told that A/S people have been given land free / cheap by the govt (for their establishments) so they are obliged to employ locals. Let them proceed legally against such land allotments. When they come you know what to do .There is no constitutional provision for job reservation(in any form) in private sector. Lets see how many the T govt employs.
Re: Beware
by Kalyan Ram on Aug 20, 2010 07:12 PM
are there any remedies for jealousy,inferiority complex and negative mindset, these are the serious mental disorders. Politicians of T are using these disorders for their narrow political gains pushing them further deep into quigmaire, god save them, lest their dream state if at all is formed will be worse then Jharkahnd.
Re: Re: Re: Beware
by Kalyan Ram on Aug 21, 2010 07:50 PM
Where are the leaders for us to give them fitting reply. CBN and chiranjeevi are cowards to talk anything against them. Lagadapati is also very soft, I am looking for Balathakrey of AR
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Beware
by THOMAS SEBASTIAN on Aug 24, 2010 05:42 PM
Mr Kalyan It is not about some individual leader tackling them. What I mean to say is, in the event of the ultimate betrayal taking place, can the 6 crore people of Andhra/Seema simply take it in their stride and move on ? Can they eat, sleep or rest in peace untill they neutralise the enemy and settle the score? To do that, planning must begin now. Rememmber what I had proposed in one of my earlier posts. There are some more things that can be done. Do not wish to elaborate here, but I cannot emphasise enough ,the need to incorporate plans to choke,destabilise and disintigrate the enemy in the annual budgets of the Andhra/Seema state.
"We should go back to the earlier formulation of liberalism by George Stuart Mill where he said that if hundred fools lie and if other hundred believe it, it is not necessarily truth"
