RE:@ Crazy f..ker answer me before u can calling names or disrespecting faiths.
by Bestcritics on Apr 16, 2008 12:29 PM
Reo kitni baar same Question likhenga aur kuch ata hai ki nahi? Killing of people in ISlam means killing those who are ready to fight and those who are killing our people for religion. And those people shud not include Oldies, Female or chilren. You have taken it in a wrong way. Infact your religion kills and rape's muslims Oldies, Female or chilren during Riots. Is this thought in your religion ?
RE:RE:@ Crazy f..ker answer me before u can calling names or disrespecting faiths.
by dp on Apr 16, 2008 12:56 PM
So do you mean the whole world is killing ur people for religion. u mean small kids,small infants, women working in offices, men waiting to reach their kids from work? are they all against your religion and killing your people.
I curse ur religion that one day GOD will Kill u all @ one place just as Once he did in TRIPOLI by snedning meteors. Read the Bible and Puran u will know why GOD sent meteors on u people.
Even in Quran, angels say to GOD, why are u creating these men again?
RE:@ Crazy f..ker answer me before u can calling names or disrespecting faiths.
by Bestcritics on Apr 16, 2008 12:37 PM
Reo i dont want to abuse you but the way u r behaving i m just trying to explain you and clarifying ur thoghts which u have derived from ur parents. I want u to understand and want u to understand your parents understand too. Accept fact dont say any thing in the air think from ur brain.
RE:RE:@ Crazy f..ker answer me before u can calling names or disrespecting faiths.
by reo on Apr 16, 2008 12:34 PM
filthy crazy f..ker can only think, do and write only filthy things.
RE:@ Crazy f..ker answer me before u can calling names or disrespecting faiths.
by ravi kumar on Apr 16, 2008 12:27 PM
crazy f... we know where to buy.. answer his question...
RE:RE:@ Crazy f..ker answer me before u can calling names or disrespecting faiths.
by dp on Apr 16, 2008 12:52 PM
hahahhaahah.....its like Satan blaming GOD for killing Devils advocates.
Why not questions are raised about mecca,Churches?Why only Hindus have to prove that Lord Ram existed?Why Hindus have to prove that whatever we worship is worth or not?We dont say anyone why do you worship allah or jesus?Why these people interfere in our ways of worship?The same thing happenned when Swami Vivekanand went to Parliament of Religions.The people there thaught that Hinduism is a religion of musicians and magicians.They are backward.He was given only 7 minutes.But what happened when he started speaking.It was published that he is an orator by devine rights.This is Hinduism.We have saints like swami vivekanand.The people are taking advantage of its tolerence.
RE:Why a Hindu has to prove always?
by reo on Apr 16, 2008 12:18 PM
what proof do u have that quran is from mohammed when he is illeducated or illiterate and he had delusions
RE:Why a Hindu has to prove always?
by Sultan on Apr 16, 2008 12:34 PM
but Mr. Ravi the problem is you and ur umma dumped your langauage sanskrit, but Arabic is live language.
RE:Why a Hindu has to prove always?
by ravi kumar on Apr 16, 2008 12:25 PM
crazy f... ram and krishna were knowing sanskrit,. the very old language in this world... first know clearly and then argue...
RE:Why a Hindu has to prove always?
by ravi kumar on Apr 16, 2008 12:31 PM
can u proove, arabic was very old language... i can proove sanskrit was very old..
RE:Why a Hindu has to prove always?
by amit saxena on Apr 16, 2008 12:17 PM
It is in ramayana.Thats all.Now you will say prove ramayana is true,Ram is true.Just like Quaran says about mecca.
RE:Why a Hindu has to prove always?
by Bond on Apr 16, 2008 12:18 PM
Yes we worship each and everything like elephant,monkey, snake,sun,solar ecplipse,lunar eclipse,peepal tree,tulsi,rivers,cow,bridges etc...
RE:Why a Hindu has to prove always?
by Kapil Dev on Apr 16, 2008 12:32 PM
Infact we worship the nature and its creatures. becuase life would not have been possible in the absence of even one element
RE:Ramayana is against women
by ravi kumar on Apr 16, 2008 12:09 PM
so can we know whats ur religion, so that we would give some instances where you could also have pecks from us...
ganges is the sacred river of hindu religion beginning from lord shiva head. you BIMARU people are polluting the river and using it for "ALL purpose" making it one of the dirtiest rivers in the wolrd.
we from tamilnadu demand that the sacred river of ganges should not be used for anything including drinking, washing, it sacredness should be maintained. you people should immediately vacate the river beds, scaredness is important than well being of crore people- the same logic told by many writers in the board
if you demand ramsethu to be maintained, first show you hinduness by not using ganges for dirty purpose and not using it to maintain sacredness
RE:SAVE GANGES
by Asheesh Sinha on Apr 16, 2008 12:33 PM
dude..do you know the concept of Ganga and why it is considered so great and sacred? Its cause its said that Ganga washes off everyone's sins and dirts, and makes a man clean.
RE:RE:Ram the GOD
by Kapil Dev on Apr 16, 2008 12:16 PM
Bhagwan Das Who is your father. Some boby must have told U.And U beleive that. Donot bark here with your twisted logic
RE:RE:Ram the GOD
by reo on Apr 16, 2008 12:07 PM
tell me u murderer, i never got answer for this --- is eating pork better than killing people in the name of religion or killing people is more superior.
RE:Ram the GOD
by reo on Apr 16, 2008 12:12 PM
I want u r answer dont deviate from the question I asked I may be doing anything but before u think about disrespecting other faiths respect lives of all the beings on earth.
RE:RE:Ram the GOD
by reo on Apr 16, 2008 12:13 PM
u still never answered my question- is eating pork better than killing people in the name of religion.
RE:Ram the GOD
by Kapil Dev on Apr 16, 2008 12:13 PM
Bhagwan Dass
Who is Your father.
Some body told u and u believ that Cause u Hv have some degree of faith in the person telling U. Same is faith Donot just bark here with your twisted logic
RE:Ram the GOD
by SV on Apr 16, 2008 12:12 PM
You go deep, Seth!! deep to the reason for modern caste formation in hindu society and superiority of upper castes like brahmin, kashtriya & baniyas.. you might be a modern day rich seth and influential in your society.. but ShriRam is god for many for his virtues & respect for father & family, love for his wife (it will be a shame to a mordern day man also if his wife is forcibly taken by another man.. well modern you are) Don't dictate us the reasons for hatered.. I love him(my god rama)...many love lord krishna.. because of caste reason again.. BY the way caste were not there when ramayana & mahabharata happened
RE:Ram the GOD
by mahabodhi on Apr 16, 2008 12:17 PM
In Mahabharata and Ramayana time no one can even think of a Guru other than a Brahamin!Who Ekalavaya!Who was Smbooka !Why was he Killed!Who were only authorised to read Vedas!
RE:its not ramsetu it is called as Nalsetu in Ramayana :)
by SV on Apr 16, 2008 12:15 PM
You go deep, Seth!! deep to the reason for modern caste formation in hindu society and superiority of upper castes like brahmin, kashtriya & baniyas.. you might be a modern day rich seth and influential in your society.. but ShriRam is god for many for his virtues & respect for father & family, love for his wife (it will be a shame to a mordern day man also if his wife is forcibly taken by another man.. well modern you are) Don't dictate us the reasons for hatered.. I love him(my god rama)...many love lord krishna.. may be caste reason again.. BY the way caste were not there when ramayana & mahabharata happened.....PITY ON YOU RICH SETH! race come first than righteousness
RE:RE:its not ramsetu it is called as Nalsetu in Ramayana :)
by vikram chakravarthy on Apr 16, 2008 12:35 PM
u fools stop ur religion fighting,,, and try to fight against the people who stops the development of our country in the name of god and religion
raman is a character only. there in no evidence that proved raman and krishna was exist. just think how can hanuman and ravan with 10 heads exist ,this are only stories try to be inteligent
RE:raman is a character only
by reo on Apr 16, 2008 12:04 PM
don u a science graduate or ill or uneducated, do u know there are malformations at the time of birth, have u heard of an article about baby born with two faces and it was a miracle for u untill u saw a photo of the baby
RE:raman is a character only
by ravi kumar on Apr 16, 2008 12:00 PM
hey buddy.. they have got the evidences from sea.. mathura has been found at sea bottoms... i hope so this is not fictitious...
RE:raman is a character only
by ramprasad on Apr 16, 2008 12:15 PM
ravi mathura is at sea bottom not in india. why are you people worried about written stories and the charactor as god. the one who suspected his wife as impure and harrassed her if he is considerd as god why not we consider so many fellows who are harrassing their wifes for dowaries and other matters also as god. be educated and thoughtfull.
RE:raman is a character only
by Vaibhav Nangare on Apr 16, 2008 12:48 PM
To Ravi Kumar
Boss its not Mathura but Dwarka (supposedely)which was Lord Krishnas Kingdom. Mathura belonged to Balram (Dauji) Lord Krishnas Brother and Arjuns Brother in law. It shows the lack of knowledge on your side. Don't talk rubbish unless u know the facts
RE:raman is a character only
by nitin tomar on Apr 16, 2008 12:15 PM
Hi don, u r right.How can a monkey lift a mountain, How can stones float on water, people say raman patted squirrel ,three white lines on squirrel's back is a proof.Raman also hugged many monkeys ,now tell me where is the proof.Raman could have been a common king,if he would have been vishnu avataar, think this gods only fought among themselves for supremacy, should be ego problem within themselves. I asked a SriLankan that was there a king called Ravan.He said to me it's right. Asked whether in your epics/ history, was there any war fought between raman & ravan,he only said no. Every one knows that ravan was much stronger than rama,more intelligent,more pious and more charectered. I only feel that there should been a poet who would have pumped more to praise & please rama to get more favour from him.
RE:Why did BJP not oppose destruction of temples for Narmada dam?
by JGN on Apr 16, 2008 12:01 PM
This is nth time you are posting the same rubbish. Btw way why anyone should beleive that a dead jew on a stick is the only saviour of mankind?
RE:Why did BJP not oppose destruction of temples for Narmada dam?
by sajansajan on Apr 16, 2008 12:09 PM
The reason i have posted it n times is bcoz it has been reported as abuse n-1 times for no rhyme or reason. Just cant counter the logic report is as abuse...sic
RE:RE:Why did BJP not oppose destruction of temples for Narmada dam?
by JGN on Apr 16, 2008 12:16 PM
Where is logic in your message? It is just neo-converts ridiculing our native culture. Of ocurse I also do not believe in any god but the neo-converts use every opportunity to proclaim the superiority of their religion when there is nothing superior in their culure.
RE:Why did BJP not oppose destruction of temples for Narmada dam?
by sajansajan on Apr 16, 2008 12:25 PM
Buddha was a neo-convert? Jain was neo-convert? Dayanand was neo convert? Haridas was neo-convert? I have not quoted 1 Muslim or Christian source. Dont believe me read Dayanand's book or Buddha's preachings. There are enuff instances of people being disillusioned with Hinduism (Brahmanical faith) even before Islam and Christianity existed. And if destruction of places of faith is what BJP opposes then it should have opposed Narmada dam. Or do BJP supporters believe their Gods are bigger and better than others. In any case why report msg for abuse post your reason if u wish
RE:Why did BJP not oppose destruction of temples for Narmada dam?
by R K Reddy on Apr 16, 2008 12:03 PM
A simple Question to all hindus.
How is Ram Setu important ? Is it because it is mentioned in their ancient scriptures ? If yes then why the forests, animals and rivers of India are disappearing and no one cares. These things are also mentioned in your scriptures. What is there in the Setu that takes precedence over (for e.g.) the ganges. Now the ganges has become a big sewage but you are comfortable with it. The vultures (garuda) have disappeared and you are comfortable with it. Can any hindu explain.
And if you want to abuse me instead of answering me then you can abuse me as much as you like.
RE:Why did BJP not oppose destruction of temples for Narmada dam?
by nitin tomar on Apr 16, 2008 12:32 PM
they do not have brains,want simple issues to become complex,complex issues to big blunders and big blunders to silly reasons to gain vote banks, any thing more than this..........
RE:Why did BJP not oppose destruction of temples for Narmada dam?
by JGN on Apr 16, 2008 12:05 PM
Another neo-convert posting the same message again and again. Don't you have anything better to ask?
RE:Is Ranayan Epic or True?
by JGN on Apr 16, 2008 12:02 PM
Ramayan is not an epic. It was brought to Saint Valmiki thru an angel like gabriel brought some holy book to a middle aged arab.
RE:Is Ranayan Epic or True?
by JGN on Apr 16, 2008 12:13 PM
I have also heard that there was a camel driver in the arabian peninsula who looted the caravan and divided the loot among his followers!
RE:Is Ranayan Epic or True?
by amit saxena on Apr 16, 2008 12:00 PM
He says--I have taken out the spiritual aspects of Quaran in masnavi and thrown the bones to dogs.
RE:Is Ranayan Epic or True?
by ravi kumar on Apr 16, 2008 11:59 AM
u read that as epic, we read that as sacred true story.... its all in how u take;///
Man has never seen the real real form of GOD. So does it mean worshipping GOD in Masjids,Mandirs and Churchs is worthless...should be break them all and open educational or rehabilitation centres instead?
I think the SC Judge should apologise to every Indian for his provocational speecha dn should resign!
India, there is no room for being partial with any religion as we are a expatriat country.
RE:Question! Mr. Judge!
by JGN on Apr 16, 2008 12:04 PM
Yes, raze all places of worhsips to ground and convert them into Educational institutions and charitable hospitals (holy places relevant in today's time)!
RE:Question! Mr. Judge!
by Sultan on Apr 16, 2008 12:39 PM
The problem is hindus understood their religion is very bad cannot be practiced because of blind beliefs, and hinduism cannot be put into practice at present day, so they are ready to accept anyting according to time. but Islam Quran is attached to each and every aspect of life till the end of this world.
