Re: wat
by symbolofpeace on Jan 14, 2009 01:12 AM
Are you sure its lifted except for the word kukku kukku. Grow up you need to listen to songs first. The tune & the music including arrangement no where matches the Khalnayak song. Did anybody here ask you to prove how small are your thought?
Re: wat
by Abhilash Sasidharan on Jan 14, 2009 10:22 AM
wake up Mr. original. rahman has not lifted that tune. he has already acknowledged that and said that it ia a tributr to thr lakshmikanth pyarelal masterpiece.
Re: Bolloywood Kick back ARR while he try to get chance in Bolloy
by symbolofpeace on Jan 14, 2009 01:16 AM
You are just a sadist. AR has always been praised by Bollywood and much better than south. In south he is being compared along with those who ape his music viz Harris. The entire Indian cinema respects AR as a genius. Why do you spread poison.
why is this stupid bollywood crap tv channels praising rahman as bollywood music director ? when a south person get a international recognition they start praising them as bollywood star ..stupid idiots, they want who ever get international award should be from bollywood ... bollywood should praise only himesh reshmaiya as bollywood music director..not rahman .
rahman started his career with tamil film roja. Rahman made most of music only for tamil films. he made music for very less number of bollywood movies. Rahman is a Tamil film music director who made india proud by winning golden globe .
Re: stupid bollywood
by Anamika on Jan 13, 2009 07:38 PM
The world knows Indian movies as 'Bollywood'....all south indian movies are part of those Indian movies.. Rahman may have started out in tamil but he has given his music to movies in all languages including English which has now fetched him an award. So dont worry what they name him as...he is an Indian who got an award for India.
Re: Re: stupid bollywood
by sachin verma on Jan 13, 2009 08:35 PM
Ass-h0le, everytime Rahman has composed music for a film and that has been nominated for OSCARS, it was not a crap mallu movie but a Bollywood movie.. On what basis r u saying him tamil? just because he resides in Chennai? Do u know that his actual name is DILEEP kumar and not a traditional tamil or mallu name? Plz chek on wiki.. get ur facts right...
Re: Re: Re: stupid bollywood
by BloodHound on Jan 15, 2009 02:08 PM
His tamil ablum Roja is in the all time best soundtracks listed by TIME magazine. And yes he resides in chennai, has his world class studio there and does all the recording there. And chennai is not some crappy north indian city which maps to mumbai for everything. It has its own identity, a solid film industry with a steady supply of talent in various aveneues. So you please check on wiki before you get your facts right
Re: Re: Re: Re: stupid bollywood
by BloodHound on Jan 15, 2009 02:27 PM
Go and check out the ARR's official website to see the awards that he has received.
Re: Re: Re: stupid bollywood
by Ranjith on Jan 13, 2009 08:49 PM
Mallu has so many dileep kumar. dont u know that? One of the super star of mallu name is dileep kumar. The name dileep kumar is not deserved only for bolloywood.
Re: Re: Re: stupid bollywood
by Ranjith on Jan 13, 2009 08:52 PM
do u know onething, AR Rahman can speak only tamil & english. He cant able to speak ur hindi or marathi. How can the name dileep deserved only for bolloywood. It is an indian name. Any part of indian can use this name. Dont u have this small sense in ur mind.
Re: Re: Re: Re: stupid bollywood
by symbolofpeace on Jan 14, 2009 01:21 AM
He can't speak hindi or Marathi doesn't vouch him as a non Indian. It was Ram Gopal Verma a person from Andhra got him into Hindi movies. He won the award for a film based on Mumbai life. Cant you see the unity here. Ar was referred to Sir Andrew Llyod Webber by Shekar Kapur and he didnt reject Ar for being a south Indian. There are many south Indians making their lives in Mumbai and vice versa. Learn to respect each other
Re: Re: Re: Re: stupid bollywood
by Sensible Indian on Jan 13, 2009 09:52 PM
Lado SAAL0..Ladoo.. You shameless people just need some excuse to start this street fight.
For god sake atleast ONCE celebrate as an INDIAN has won.
Re: Re: Re: stupid bollywood
by BloodHound on Jan 15, 2009 02:03 PM
You idiot. 70% of ARR songs in hindi are dubbed or copied from tamil. Go get your facts right before talking. He is very muhc based out of kollywood, not eh crappy bollywood which scouts from 700 million and still cant produce class music directors.
Re: stupid bollywood
by Praveen on Jan 14, 2009 12:48 AM
Why you guys always split into north and south, that caste and this caste, that religion and this religion, I think we are the same and above all we all are Indians. Try to glorify the achievements of our people instead of fighting within us. Whats the difference in you guys and a terrorist.
I am a guy from Chennai. I appreciate people every one who has achieved something in life irrespective of region, language and caste. If guys like us who are educated enough to know all these think like this, then I wonder what will be the mind set of people who are not educated.
Rahman is not the best musician that India has produced, but he is definitely a musician who carved a niche and a style that appeals to the younger and a global audience. He understands all kinds of music, and doesnt hesitate to experiment all forms of music be it classical, folk, jazz or hip-hop..
He is excellent in the sense that he gave chance to a lot of new singers & musicians, before Rahman there were just a handful of singers who ruled the roost. Rahman experiments different voices all the time and picks singers that suit the mood of the song.
His humility is another endearing thing when we have so many musicians like Anu Malik, Nadeem/Shravan & others who endlessly boast about their tunes though we all know how good they are at copying..
Good going Rahman, you truely deseerved it, and thanks for dedicating the awards to India ...we are proud of you.
Re: Rahman
by symbolofpeace on Jan 14, 2009 01:25 AM
What do you mean he is not the best. No body is "The best" because human life hasn't stopped yet. What he has achieved today wasn't by any other Indian musician either bcs opportunity. But wait opportunity comes to everyone only the best utilizes it. So its now safe to say AR is the best in the current.
Listen to the songs of Haathi mera saathi Yadon ki baarat Bobby Mera jeevan saathi Kati patang
The list is endless and I stop and proceed to Tamil
Listen to the tamil movies like 2.1.Jhony 3.Ullasa Paravaigal 4.Ninaithale innikum 5.Mullu malaram 6.Alaigal ovivathillai 7.Sigapu rojakal 8.Nizhalgal 9. Kizhake pogum rayil again the list is endless and i switch to malayalam 1. Triveni 2. Madhonotsavam 3. Pachnagni 4. Padmavyuham 5. Mizhirendilum 6. Olangal
and I switch to telugu 1. Sankarabharanam 2. Abhinandam 3. Abhilasha 4. Megasanthesham 5. Ladies Tailor the endless list so i switch to kannada
1. Bayalu daari 2. Nagara Haavu 3. Dharmasere 4. Aalemane 5. Anubhandana 6. Pallavi Anu pallavi 7. Geetha and I switch to Bengali 1.Aranyer Din Ratri 2.Chiriyakhana 3.Megh Kalo 4.Pathe Jete Jete 5.Ei Rim Jhim Jhim
Re: Please listen and judge the songs if you have time
by Guru on Jan 13, 2009 07:44 PM
You have taken enough efforts to list the movies for which IR composed music. I have heard most of them, and I have no doubts that they are all good. But, it will not take any time to list the movies for which ARR composed and ask you to judge them. Me and you are nothing in front of these legends to judge their work. The point is, just becos you have listed the movies, doesn't make ARR any less great.
Re: Re: Please listen and judge the songs if you have time
by Ranjith on Jan 13, 2009 09:16 PM
We cant compare IR vs ARR. Both are different with each other styles. IR has his own style of music which ARR cant do that. ARR has his own style of music which IR cant do.
We have to differeciate this and listen this both legent music in music sprit
congrats to rahman. He made indians proud. he is more lucky to recieve this award because the film slumdog is such a ground for him to score more, which other indian greats didnt get. But he is not the greatest. Ilayaraaja sir is unfortunate for his films have not reached international fame. If it had been,then he would have won many awards internationally. remember raakamma song from thalapathy was rated no.1 in BBC. If it would have been nominated for oscars then raaja sir definitely deserves it. that y i said rahman is lucky.
Re: rahman is lucky.
by Guru on Jan 13, 2009 06:58 PM
Come on, its impossible for anybody to survive in the music industry for so long just by luck or hype. It sure needs talent, versatility and innovation, which is abundant with ARR.
And one more thing. I respect IR equally, but let me tell you this. During the 80s, there were not many composers to compete with IR. Most others were just mediocre. And thats one reason why his music was a relief and became instantly popular. But when ARR came, he had to live up to the competition with IR. And slowly, there were other new musicians to compete with. Even with that kind of challenge, he time and again innovated the music, changed the music trend, brought in new music, found n number of new talent, crossed boundaries and made a name of himself internationally. This is not mere luck.
Re: rahman is lucky.
by upekshit hai on Jan 13, 2009 06:17 PM
I am not form South..have some query: Why ALL ARR fans respect IR inspite of IR having some foolish fans who do not want to go beyond their well..?IR fans always disrespect any other composer..attitude problem?
Re: Re: rahman is lucky.
by sangeethjoyraj on Jan 13, 2009 08:15 PM
friend, i respect rahman and his talent and he has brought indian music to international stage through this award no doubt. but still he cant be the best thats what i mean to say. IR'S fans would not accept any other composer as best other than him. thats not the mistake of his fans rather the impact of his music on his fans is such great.
Re: rahman is lucky.
by Red on Jan 13, 2009 06:25 PM
Rahman has no attitude and is down to earth. His music represents contemporary world we live in.
Illayaraja has composed a symphony recognised internationally in classical music. However, Illayaraja spoke ill about Rahman when he shot to fame initially during his first debut years. Illayaraja should have been graceful in accepting Rahman's success.
Bottomline, both are good in their own genre, but AR Rahman is more humbler than Illayaraja.
Re: rahman is lucky.
by Bond Kr on Jan 13, 2009 06:04 PM
Rahman is definitely the greater musician than Illayaraja man. What are you talking? Ilayaraja's music, to me sounds primitive and repetitive. Add to that his sound.. that's horrible. On the contrary, Rahman's music is youthful, crisp, has variety, and I can go on..
Re: Re: rahman is lucky.
by Mahesh on Jan 13, 2009 07:01 PM
What is youthful music? There is no such thing called youthful or oldage music.Probaly noise suits current youth than music. Becoz youth expects every song to be fun and danceable. And I am sorry to say you have poor taste in music. To judge IR music one should have minimum qualification. It's not like indian politics where any crook or scoundrels can become a politician.
Re: Re: Re: rahman is lucky.
by Guru on Jan 13, 2009 07:25 PM
I guess its the same with ARR too. You need to have a minimum qualification to judge his music.
Re: rahman is lucky.
by Bond Kr on Jan 13, 2009 06:11 PM
He is not just lucky. In today's world with such a lot of competition, you need more than just luck to survive.. and that is hard work, skill, commitment, and the willingness to learn new ways of composing music, for example, the usage of computers. So, don't try to undermine ARR's award, buddy.
Re: rahman is lucky.
by Vijayanand A K on Jan 13, 2009 05:35 PM
Ilaiyaraja is a great mucisian but does repeteitive tunes and is a real bum wrt attitude.
