Those mentioned 34 was not Akbar's wives/they all the called-herem/The way was maintaining that time who the womens were living & serving the Emperors. As same as Nawabs in Lakhnaw-their kepts!ButThe mother of Badshah jahangir was a rajput of course & she was the sister of Mansingh-Head of the deffence(Pradhan senapati of Akbar)obviously.But it is controversies that the mother of Jahangir Aka selim NAME was Jodha bai or what so ever.
RE:Akbar's 34 wives
by Sama Saymin on Feb 07, 2008 10:27 AM
Haven't u hear about the famous story named"The Arabian Nights"-from that we all know about Aladin's cherag & so many short stories comes.So the first starting of that Arabian nights- in introduction part/has been mentioned that"The emperor every night get married with one beautiful girl for only ONE NIGHT STAND & the next morning she has had to be killed by The King or his jallad's.In that way lastly one queen was very sharp/intelligent,she had started to telling a story to the king continuously with out finishing every night,the kind keenly waiting for the next night to listen/in that way The Arabian Nights has 100 short stories linked each other-comes one by one/at the end the king couldn't killed that queen.The queen became a proud mother of a prince!!!Akbar had the same old story(without any Arabian nights story,but may be more-who knows?)
Some times that womens never been used 2nd time/few of them virgin till death but no body had any rights to touch them except the all Emperors.in this reason inside of these HEREMS only allowed the KHOJA's(who have to operated bound to impotent/shown a few of them in a short character in the movie Mughal e Azam/they dressed up like ladies)& Ladies/No Gents were allowed in side of Herem & in the ANTAR MAHAL!
RE:Akbar's 34 wives
by lotus shah on Feb 07, 2008 03:04 PM
hey man really good post.. i was laughing my head off... anyways who cares if akbar had 3 or 30 or 300 wives... honestly all this is just to crete some publicity for the movie. i dont think i shall bother seeing such a movie anyways too boring for my taste... maybe u can make a movie with this 3 wives taking aaway his empire funda.. shall watch that for sure!!!
RE:Akbar's 34 wives
by Hemang on Feb 07, 2008 01:46 AM
I would answer first
If he gets married to a modern girl & shouts to her for even once, the girls would throw him out of his empire & would sue him for divorce & ask for 30% of his empire as compensation.
In this way after 3 marriages - Akbar would be like a BHIKHARI
RE:Akbar's 34 wives
by Sameer Aneja on Feb 07, 2008 10:29 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA......... I HAD MY LAUGH OF THE DAY,,,,,,, YOU ROCKED MY LIFE FOR A DAY HEMANG
RE:Akbar's 34 wives
by Deepa TS on Feb 07, 2008 05:45 PM
You seem to be a typical male. Why are you people marrying when you cannot look after your wives? You people should remain bachelors lifelong. You should never marry. Don't grumble after marrying someone.
Hyderabad, Feb. 5: India got its genes through Indo-Aryans and the Neolithic practices and languages from the Fertile Crescent that makes up the ancient Egypt and the Mediterranean region. A joint study by Ms S. Manjulatha Devi, Irshad Ahmad and a few others of the city-based Centre for Liver Research and Diagnostics, Deccan College of Medical Sciences and Allied Hospitals, and the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, supported the hypotheses related to the gene flow in India through Indo-Aryans.
The scientists conducted the study on Helicobacter pylori, a pathogen that lives in human stomach. The species of H. pylori that is found in present day Indian population is similar to that of the European strain inhabiting the stomachs of people who live in the West. "This perhaps conveys the message that H. pylori was most probably introduced to the Indian subcontinent by ancient Indo-European nomadic people and our findings are, therefore, consistent with the idea of a possible gene flow into India with the arrival of Indo-Aryans," the scientists pointed out.
According to the study, H. pylori might have arrived in India at the same time when Indo-European language speaking people crossed into India around 4,000 or 10,000 years ago. The city scientists arrived at the conclusion that as H. pylori co-evolves with its host, the multiple population and sub-population of the pathogen s
RE:Aryan Theory
by Amit Ketkar on Feb 07, 2008 01:05 AM
Is it possible that the reverse happened.. Indians migrated to Europe, and hence the Europeans have the H. pylori....
Muslims always day-dream . So its obvious that those historians must have manipulated the real events. What ever we learn in history may or may not be true.
For example the fact in history of aryans in India coming from central Asia during 2000BC , is documented by western historians by just mere guess by Western Historians, no absolute evidence.in Our Purans , upanishads , no where its mentioned like that. Its alleged that westerers have manipulated te history , just to show case thier superierity over Indians.
Also I ve heard that Indira gandhi has spread metallic documents and earthed them in several places in india that during 100 years , Gandhi dynasty ruled India. So when aftr 500 years down the line , students of India will read the history like wise.
RE:Muslim Historians in the era of akbar
by tata on Feb 07, 2008 08:58 AM
thakur saab, y do u want to bring north n south issue in this discussion....think b4 u post something....come out of india, then discriminate indians in this fashion, u will be the first one to suffer with that
RE:Muslim Historians in the era of akbar
by on Feb 07, 2008 12:34 AM
Whose word would you trust more on history...A Historians or a Film-Makers? Agreed parts of history as we know now are not acurate but it is a well documented and known fact that Akbar's hindu wife was not called jodhabai. Check wikipedia. Historians couldn't have manipulated that site!!! Ashutosh should put a disclaimer stating that it is a work of fiction
