Patcy find another job. Glamorous face in a movie like this. Why not songs, dances, item numbers and some sex? This is the most Stupid review I have read in my entire life. Rajpal Yadav is a fabulous actor and does not need certificate from a half baked reviewer. After writing so much trash, Rediff has the audacity to give 3 Stars for the movie. Just Goddamned Rubbish. The Movie and Rajpal deserve better persons to review.
I pity your review skills. "But audience wants a glamorous face" - Please tell me which glamorous face acts well, too. Besides, i guess this kind of a story demands acting, not a face. Please watch some romantic movie instead if you want glamorous faces. "Secondly the dialogues were very cheap and vulgar at times. It is understandable that Asgar Hussain must have come from such background, but there is something called adaptation so this movie could have been based in better environment. Do you think such things don't happen in a middle or upper middle class family?" Boss, this is a story of THAT family and THAT environment. Did you want it to be based in Switzerland with Hinglish songs and bikini babes on Thai beaches?
The reviewer appears to be new. The language used in the review is not professional, with lots of gammatical and punctuation errors. no mention of background score, the song-n-dance sequence, the display of emotions and other stuff. some better people could be employed for reviewing purpose especially when rediff reviews affect the opinion of many people
I pity your review skills. >>But audience wants a glamorous face.>Secondly the dialogues were very cheap and vulgar at times. It is understandable that Asgar Hussain must have come from such background, but there is something called adaptation so this movie could have been based in better environment. Do you think such things don't happen in a middle or upper middle class family?
RE:Reposting...
by Kaushik Das on Feb 09, 2007 08:36 PM
What's happening? Why is the text not posting properly??? :-( ---------------- I pity your review skills. >>But audience wants a glamorous face.>Secondly the dialogues were very cheap and vulgar at times. It is understandable that Asgar Hussain must have come from such background, but there is something called adaptation so this movie could have been based in better environment. Do you think such things don't happen in a middle or upper middle class family?
I pity your review skills. >>But audience wants a glamorous face.>Secondly the dialogues were very cheap and vulgar at times. It is understandable that Asgar Hussain must have come from such background, but there is something called adaptation so this movie could have been based in better environment. Do you think such things don't happen in a middle or upper middle class family?
grow up patchy man. its not always about gazing stars... its about creating a star.. he is a brilliant actor. i know in all movies his character is stupid, foolish to make people laugh. i think u are looking at that image and quoting audience wants a glamarous face. thats not the case.Audience appreciates the justice done to the character played.Big stars yes! can get audiences to theatre's but will get very dispappointed if movie is not gud and stars like rajpal yadav will always be appreciated even if they do a small character no matter if dialogues are less. Have you seen all his movies? he has always done justice to his role. always!! but big starts dont always do.only actors like rajpal yadav or irfan khan can act in these type of roles.
