I am not getting a point why Ram Gopal Verma is after the gosts. He is just insulting the ghosts by making substandard movies. After "darna mana hai", "vastu shastra" this is another waste of money. I did'nt got any logic of connection between the transplanted eye and the ghost. After making the Rajasthan village ghost happy, Naina was again continuously seeing the dark people. How the Indian ghost reached London - By air? Story line was totally pathetic. Only watchable was the special effects.
miss sukanya, it is pathetic on ur part to rat bubbly and bunty so high and naina a bad movie. please dont go on the banners , atleast see the movie before writing about it. The review was a bullshit as usual
hey all with guts - watch naina , its very well made
These days, it has become fashionable to blame every Rediff reviewer, as soon as a new review is published. Why blame the reviewer? He/She can at most express individual impressions about the movie; and naturally there will be some people who may agree and some who do not. That is human nature.
And for piracy in Indian movies, there are some responses here that support piracy with a question to the effect, "what is wrong if a Hindi movie 'borrows' from another source?". Well, if you don't pay for borrowing, you are stealing. Somebody in Hollywood has bought rights to make Munnabhai MBBS in English. How would you feel if somebody steals the idea, makes a moview and does not even mention in the credits? That is what piracy is.
ok, may ne sukanya went lil overboard in shredding the movies to tiny winy pieces. It was pretty tight till interval, but still that doesnt make naina a gud movie. In the end it was just another poor attempt by bollywood. In old times we had ramsay brothers who thought horror meant funny masks, gore, blood. And now we have new breed who thinks horror is amplifying the sound of fan, sudden change in background score,slick camerawork, but sadly that doesnt make a movie good,a tight script does. naina seems to be going gud till intermission but sadly after intermission it seems to loose its way. And what makes the whole things really pathetic, is blatant copy of scenes from foreign movies. Is it some kind of superstition or what? that if you copy story you have to copy scenes exactly?I refuse to belive that bollywood lacks creativity to this extent.Dont know who is the real cuplrit but I wanna ask one thing that why not just dub the damn movie? Urmila was ok in the movie, but i have seen her doing better. Other actors did their bit but the director failed to deliver. And for those who disagree with the reviewer, please see the BO fate of the movie. It clearly speaks how gud it is.
well movie has started well with those horrying scenes but after the intermision it takes a different turns ,something unexpected . overall i rate this novie as average .
its for EVERY NAINA
by ankur on May 31, 2005 05:52 PM
well i think the critics arent doing any justice to urnail , her perfornace was remarkable .....ppz tell me any bollywood heroine who can perform better than urmaila in this type of role . atleast judge the movie from the different not merely with the stories .
I think teh review doesn't do the movie justice.the movie wasn't bad and Urmila didnt look jaded. And pls dont keep on showing off your Knowledge of teh International movie.I guess saying that the movie was a remake of a Thai 1 was ok, but I thought u were defintely off the topic half way within teh review. Rediff pls change the reviewer.I don't look to Rediff for relaible reviews anymore.
The reviewer is quite impressed with the foreign movies but need to have a nutural look at bolywood movies if u keep in mind the foreign movies then the review will be bad so try to cultivate the taste.
Seems like Rediff reviewers has no knowledge about cinema. Even they dont know how to appreciate a movie when it has been tried in a different way.. They gotto change their attitude otherwise Rediff has to assign some knowledgable person.
