Discussion Board

Why being a pure vegetarian may be a BAD IDEA


Total 186 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
om shanti
...
by om shanti on Dec 26, 2011 05:48 PM  | Hide replies

Look at your teeth,some are meant for tearing flesh1.

If every one of our 120 crores population eats only vegetables,then the price of Cauli Flower will be Rupees 300 per kg and Brinjal will cost Rs 200 per Kg.

So,be thankful to non-vegetarians...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
wizardo id
Re: ...
by wizardo id on Dec 26, 2011 06:18 PM
"Look at your teeth,some are meant for tearing flesh"

that's rather silly! we dont have canines like the wild animals, besides have have molars like the bovines.

besides, cows need grains to fatten up, so you need more grains to raise non veg food. your argument is lacks logic


   Forward   |   Report abuse
megha
Re: Re: ...
by megha on Dec 26, 2011 09:18 PM
both are wrong. Man is naturally not a non-vegetarian. But he is not a vegetarian either.He can naturally eat only fruits and nuts... like a monkey. Most other things need to be cooked or modified. We cannot live without modified food since there are no more forests.
But we need animals to give us milk and other products. Yet we cannot allow those animals to increase in big numbers because that would put pressure on nature. So the cycle of killing and eating animals which are no longer useful to man, is necessary to preserve the system

   Forward   |   Report abuse
John Lennon
Re: ...
by John Lennon on Dec 26, 2011 08:14 PM
that's what zakir nala yak says.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
rajnikant sharma
Re: ...
by rajnikant sharma on Dec 26, 2011 08:47 PM
If every one of our 120 crores population starts non vegetarian food only then what will be the price of meat, chicken etc.They r already costilier then vegetables.So stop giving baseless arguments to support the bad and unhealthy ideas.Humans are not made for eating the animals.

R.K.Sharma


   Forward   |   Report abuse
om shanti
Re: Re: ...
by om shanti on Dec 27, 2011 08:47 PM
I did not say that all should non-veg food.And no need to all also become vegetarian.Stop this convers1on business,I am already fed up of the vat1can and western churches1,let us not start this..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Bang On
Re: Re: Vedas permit/promote non-veg food
by Bang On on Dec 26, 2011 05:45 PM
Encourage him,not discourage.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
aus ant
Fully Evolved
by aus ant on Dec 26, 2011 04:34 PM  | Hide replies

Studies have shown that only fully evolved humanbeings can digest non veg completely.
Others who are still evolving beings prefer veg diet.
Most indians who are the so called 'pure veggies' fall in this category.
They have eons to go till they become fully evolved humanbeings.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rangan
Re: Fully Evolved
by Rangan on Dec 26, 2011 04:45 PM
HA HA HA. You actually mean those who have evolved into some kind of inhuman animal can digest the non-veg food right?

In case you don't know, many of these animals from western counties are now trying hard to evolve to vegetarian humans. When the population grows, it is the only way to survive unless you evolve to eat humans also.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
ravi padman
Re: Fully Evolved
by ravi padman on Dec 26, 2011 08:49 PM
U r wrong. Goto ny nutirtionist and they will tell U tht human teeth and digestive system is not desgined for Non Veg food.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aus ant
Re: Re: Fully Evolved
by aus ant on Dec 26, 2011 11:59 PM
Only manuwadi nutritionists say that.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 186 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message