Why sehwag ? He didnt play in Irani . Not in form and not a test player techi. Wasim Jaffer must have included. He has played test earlier also and is a good tech player fit for Test. He s'd have replaced Gambhir & not Shikhar Dhavan.This is a clear quota system.
I dont understand the basis on which Murali vijay is selected.. It's unfair towards Wasim Jaffer who is in prime form.. Statistics indiacte that.. Wasi Jaffer: Last 8 matches - 1016 runs & 5 hundreds
Re: Unfair selection
by Ashok Lobo on Feb 10, 2013 04:42 PM
bcci is a monopoly u dont get selected on performances u cement your place playing for India Cements...do as Seena says
Re: Unfair selection
by Rohit Maroli on Feb 10, 2013 05:14 PM
because that 39 yr old player has tonked all the best bowlers in his prime, and he at 39 is still better than jaffer, at 35,25,20 or watever..... And the form tat lot of guys are talking abt is on placid wickets and club class bowlers....!
Re: Re: Unfair selection
by shivraj yeole on Feb 10, 2013 09:23 PM
Even for the non-performers who got selected, it was same placid wickets and club class bowlers
why sreeshanth was not selected?something wrong with the selectors.He could have given aussies a big threat.He should be selected for the remaiming matches at least.ishant is waste,
