Re: this paki low commission in london
by w a on Sep 03, 2010 06:26 PM
Surely hanged! But what about them who already Challanged them.. BCCI did in 2002 when Sachin found guilty of ball tempring!!! and they refused to accept it..Do you have any thougt on it..
This is typical Paki behavior. It is always somebody elses fault. Shahid Afridi was caught on camera scuffing up the pitch and biting the ball and this guy is their captain. The pattern of cheating and backstabbing is ingrained in the psyche of that country. Thats their lifestyle. Owning up responsibility is alien to these losers.
Re: Characterless
by w a on Sep 03, 2010 06:29 PM
Yes, I am agree to you. But Sachin and Dravid also did the same and caught on Camera While tempring the ball. But Sachin is legend and Dravid is The WALL... I think they also made the same crime....but they are great!!!
Re: Re: Characterless
by sunil k on Sep 03, 2010 07:30 PM
tat's correcting the "seam" on cricket ball....not disfiguring it....PAKIS does a different thing....scraching a side of a ball with finger nails...just besides the seam and later "lifting the seam" of the ball....it will disfigure soon, then starts to reverse swing....they are "masters" init...did it so many times and still doing..
The essence of the argument is Pak bowlers deliberately bowled no balls and the effect is England batsman cant get out.
Look at this scenario:
In the match where Anil Kumble got 10 Pakistani wickets, Javagal Srinath deliberately bowled wide balls, though technically they are not declared wides, in his last couple of overs so that he would not get a wicket but Kumble can get it when his turn comes up. This Srinath had stated on record.
Was Srinath banned for deliberately bowling wide balls and for not taking wickets? Was Srinath banned?
Here Pakistani bowlerd did that for money where as Srinath did for getting encomiums.
Similarly, when Trevor Chappel deliberately bowled under arm at the behest of Greg Chappel who was the captain, was either Greg Chappel or Trevor banned?
Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOULD HAVE BEEN
by Arvind Sharma on Sep 03, 2010 06:09 PM
Your analogy is incorrect. Please see, when Srinath did what he did, he was not under control of someone else outside the field. The gesture had more to do with helping his teammate create a record and not help the opposition in any way.
Re: Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOULD HAVE B
by Kabeer on Sep 03, 2010 06:18 PM
What is incorrect?
When Srinath bowled one or two were declared wides wherein Pakistan got the benefit of those extra runs.
Can anyone say, Indian captain insisted Srinath to bowl wicket taking deliveries?
WHat about the situations when victory was 1-2 runs away and one batsman short of century with plenty of overs and time left and the batsman do not take runs at all. When the other player scores a century, and if that player is like Sachin, post century if the sponsor gives lacs as prize, what is that?
Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOULD HAVE BEEN
by max skinner on Sep 03, 2010 06:08 PM
Let's see, by your logic if someone sacrifices his opportunity so that his teammate can set a new record and shine the country's name is the same as someone who sacrifices his opportunity in return for growing his own bank account and betraying his own country.
Brilliant, the Pak players need you as their life coach.
Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOULD HAVE BEEN
by Nilesh Rathi on Sep 03, 2010 06:07 PM
PPPorkiss will always find a way to blame others for their own mess. That is why their own people are suffering at the hands of nature because they do not want to help themselves just want uparwala to do it for them or best they can kill others for their uparwala.
Even then these people are not satisfied and start blaming every tom dick and harry for their troubles. I wish they are wiped from the face of the earth... that might help in restoring at least some peace in the world.
Re: Re: Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOULD HA
by Veera Ballal on Sep 03, 2010 06:07 PM
Burnol is available in large quantity in Porki land as that is the staple ointment for all their burns and they burning is congenital.
Re: Re: Re: Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOUL
by jelly on Sep 03, 2010 06:14 PM
veera we will supply u burnol soon...coz the paki team will be given a clean chit,,even the scotland yard cudnt find ne proof....so all he best and keep ur hands moist,,,hehehehhehehe
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL S
by JD Plastic on Sep 03, 2010 06:17 PM
u seem like mad porkistani who is laughing when his country is about to get finished
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL S
by Veera Ballal on Sep 03, 2010 06:27 PM
What will the Porkis supply other than the JUD, LET, Al Qaeda. For everything else, you use a BEGGING BOWL. Our PM has given you $ 25 million. The whole country is running on debt, if you call it running....
Re: Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOULD HAVE B
by jelly on Sep 03, 2010 06:05 PM
prahbakar, mongia, jadeja, azhar and who can forget the muderer sidhu.....these guys were tainted
Re: Re: Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOULD HA
by Veera Ballal on Sep 03, 2010 06:10 PM
Not Azhar. He was framed and to atone the mistake of banning him, we made him an MP. he will become the Indian 10%....
Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOULD HAVE BEEN
by V S on Sep 03, 2010 06:04 PM
Neither Srinath nor Chappell was PAID to bowl the NO BALL. There's a difference between unsportsmen like conduct and criminal behaviour.
