Right from day one there is enough eveidence to "Provisionaly suspend" 3 players to save the game of cricket. - To start with, PCB did not want to withdraw these players plating even in current series (as if nothing has happened) - Then they say, players have withdrawn (but they have not suspended them) meaning players, if chooses to, can make himself available for ODIs - The video is too good eveidence and the exact cash traded found in Butt's locker & room is a final nail in the coffin.
Re: Re: It has already been a week.
by Sports Lover on Sep 03, 2010 06:39 PM
Stop it you stupid person. You are replying with same message to ever post.
Indian cricket gets honoured by IAF conferring the rank of Group Captain on star cricketer Sachin Tandulkar. Simultaneously, ICC dishonours Pak Cricket by issuing suspension notice4 on three of its players. What a contrast!
The essence of the argument is Pak bowlers deliberately bowled no balls and the effect is England batsman cant get out.
Look at this scenario:
In the match where Anil Kumble got 10 Pakistani wickets, Javagal Srinath deliberately bowled wide balls, though technically they are not declared wides, in his last couple of overs so that he would not get a wicket but Kumble can get it when his turn comes up. This Srinath had stated on record.
Was Srinath banned for deliberately bowling wide balls and for not taking wickets? Was Srinath banned?
Here Pakistani bowlerd did that for money where as Srinath did for getting encomiums.
Similarly, when Trevor Chappel deliberately bowled under arm at the behest of Greg Chappel who was the captain, was either Greg Chappel or Trevor banned?
Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOUD HAVE BEEN BA
by sunil k on Sep 03, 2010 07:25 PM
big joke.....join ICC panel headed by PAKIS...to defend these tainted players....fool know the difference between...spot fixing and bowling out side the off stump.......what an "idiot" u r....according to u...every no ball bowled by a bowler is a suspecios spot fixing....!!!! wow grt..!!!!
Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOUD HAVE BEEN BA
by tillu on Sep 03, 2010 06:35 PM
hypothetically say you are right, past wong does not make it right. I would say these paki players should be executed publicly. Its a pathetic country with most pathetic ppl on this earth. They should be shot in head even for a slight error..
Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOUD HAVE BEEN BA
by Pradeep S on Sep 03, 2010 06:35 PM
He did'nt bowl Wides taking money dear friend, If at all he had bowled it !!!!
Re: JAVAGAL SRINATH & GREG CHAPPEL SHOUD HAVE BEEN BA
by Karthikeyan Rajendran on Sep 03, 2010 06:34 PM
Hi, please provide your bank account number so I can send you soem cash for your much needed meds.
I can show instances where betting was done that certain Indian bowlers who bowled 140 plus in previous matches did not bowl above 135 on a particular day on a particular innings and on a particular match.
Re: SOME INDIANS BOWLERS DELIBERATELY BOWLED UNDER 140 KMPH
by tillu on Sep 03, 2010 06:36 PM
who the heck cares what you have to show, just shove it up yours and be happy gay
PCB suing ICC will show no-confidence in ICC. If PCB does not respect ICC decision, why does it remain as an affiliate of ICC. It can break off from ICC and automatically from all other cricket Boards of other countries. PCB can remain isoloated and follow its own rules and play on its own cricket grounds. DO YOU THINK IT WILL BE A GOOD RIDDENCE?
