Re: Agree with Kemp K on SRK by Lotiya Pathan on Mar 26, 2010 04:56 AM
There are many Muslim public figure in India and I dont see them behaving SRK's way-choosing such cheap way to promote themshelve.
Pakistan goverment doing all it can to distroy India via State Sponsored Terrorism. Hundreds of innocent Indians dying from the Terrorist attacks. Mumbai attack was just happened and public is on the edge about Pakistan's involvement. BCCI cancels Cricket series with Pakistan indeffinately and tactically ignores Paki Players from IPL.
And at that time, SRK comes out and speaks in favor of Pakistan.
Re: suryanarayanan ramesh -- please comment on this
by LG on Mar 26, 2010 08:55 AM
Praboodh,
he will not come up because he has got sensible answers. Maybe u do not know but lots of people from pak or pak origin come here in disguise as Indians.
Re: on Shahrukh Khan the traitor by suryanarayanan ramesh on Mar 26, 2010 08:21 AM Prabodh Jain,
It's not good 4 U 2 comment on somebody's popularity. Popularity is nothing 2 do with that concerned clebrity particular their attitude/Character/money wise.
Atlast, V should be happy that an Indian is so much popular in many countries rather seeing him as a Musalman (or) Mumbaite which is my only request 2 U.
I think U R unnecessarily touching the Islamic sentiments. Mind U, neither I am a Shahrukh's Fan nor supporting the Muslims in this message. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>& gt;>>
suryanarayanan ramesh,
Here come another man impersonating as intellectuals.
Now you have sign PATRIOTIC CITIZEN in the end of your comment to sound like an Indian.
Re: suryanarayanan ramesh -- impersonating as an intellectual
by Take That on Mar 26, 2010 08:44 AM
who are you LG to judge who is what. everybody has the right to make a comment. You mind your own business. If you dont like it, get 0ut.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sachin
by Jai Hind on Mar 26, 2010 09:48 AM
Wow - you might want to look up "copy/paste" in wikipedia or something like that - I didn't realize writing a different sentence with the same meaning is "copy/paste" :-)
Tendulkar hit boundaries in successive overs from Morkel and Balaji as the bowlers once gifted him full toss deliveries. However, Balaji had the big wicket of Tendulkar, who was beaten by the slower delivery, top edged a slow bouncer and was caught by wicketkeeper Mahendra Singh Dhoni
Re: Re: thanks latter
by sajo john on Mar 26, 2010 08:36 AM
i think he is a panwaala new to rediff..............so condone his ignorance.............dilip singh paanwaala
Re: Re: Re: thanks latter
by sajo john on Mar 26, 2010 08:38 AM
iam sure he didn't mess up ur life...........then r u such a big loser.take that...........
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: thanks latter
by sajo john on Mar 26, 2010 08:46 AM
u mind first. who the hell r u to say sachiin messed up dat ball.............u must be an ardent dada fan who can't digest sachin's success.............and dada's never ending tales of failures .................
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: thanks latter
by sajo john on Mar 26, 2010 08:58 AM
first of all he was not bowled he was caught..........den u r disgarce to the country ..........o y theres r losers like u........who donno knw to appreciate gr8ness
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: thanks latter
by Take That on Mar 26, 2010 08:51 AM
get l0st you @sajo john parasite. dont be a s@chin chamcha. yes he messed up the ball and got bowled.
CSK's bowling is really really weak. They don't have a decent opening bowler. Albie Morkel actually is just a 1st or 2nd change bowler for SA. He has to open the bowling for CSK because they have'nt got anyone else. Balaji and Joginder Sharma lack pace and can be easily overpowered on Indian pitches.
After losing Flintoff due to injury, CSK made half hearted bids for Pollard and Shane Bond and failed to secure either of them. The result is that CSK's fast bowling is toothless.
Re: these guys are crazzy
by B M on Mar 26, 2010 08:18 AM
MI players complemented each other very well and the victory was a team effort.
Shikhar Dhawan took the charge and set the tone. Sachin played the anchor role and made sure that the good work of the opening partnership did not go waste. Pollard played a nice cameo that ensured the match did not go to the last over and Bravo provided the finishing touches. Earlier, the bowlers (specially McLaren and Bhajji) did a decent job and MI were prevented from reaching 200 inspite of having 8 wickets in hand.
All in all, a good team effort by Mumbai.
MI may have won, but I feel the MOM award should have gone to Suresh Raina rather than Sachin.
Re: Re: these guys are crazzy
by LG on Mar 26, 2010 08:27 AM
Why MOM should have gone to Raina? Yes, played well; scored 82 runs. But, it was the controlled and well balanced inning from Sachin that won the Match, hence MOM. Yes, if u have Sekhar Dhavan, it would have been more appropriate and logical.
He is in the best form of his life in T20. He is tearing bowlers apart with his elegant stroke making. He has taken Mumbai Indians to the top almost single handedly. But what makes him play for IPL, and say no to Team INDIA - MONEY ! Considering his current form, I am confident that we can bring home the world cup if he joins the team. It might be sachin who takes the final call as no one can force him, but a player who prefers money over his own country surely need not be considered for any national award.
Re: Does SACHIN deserve BHARATH RATNA !
by Rick Shaw on Mar 26, 2010 08:21 AM
well...why did you not say the same when he did not participate in T20 Worldcup in 2008? - He has retired from International T20 format in 2007. - If he decides to come back people like you will again say, he is not retiring & blocking chances of young players!!! (People like you will always see negative in SRT)
Re: Re: Does SACHIN deserve BHARATH RATNA !
by shane bond on Mar 26, 2010 08:46 AM
b cause he was not in form in 2008 and if he has retired from T20 format... why does he want to play in the IPL....think u idiots !
Re: Re: Re: Does SACHIN deserve BHARATH RATNA !
by ASHISH KUMAR on Mar 26, 2010 03:32 PM
U idiot bond- IPL is not a internation cricket. also why should he play under politican dhobi captaincy who declared in past that seniors are not fit to play T20 though dhobi himself was biggest failure in t20 wcup. Even jaisurya, hyden, gilly etc playing in IPL after retirement & so is sachin.
Re: Does SACHIN deserve BHARATH RATNA !
by LaX Ray on Mar 26, 2010 08:19 AM
Thats your way of interpretation. What if he thinks at this age he is not fit for 20 20 and thus does not want to put the country T20 team at stake. Taking risk for IPL franchisee is one thing and putting stake on country is different. How do you think Sourav is not considered for anything in INdian team can lead KKR or Warne still play in IPL. IPL is business and entertainment. But when you play for country you need more commitment. And dont try to judge Sachin with your small capability. Leave the GOD to himself.
Re: Does SACHIN deserve BHARATH RATNA !
by ASHISH KUMAR on Mar 26, 2010 03:30 PM
He rightly not playing wcup. He shouldnot play along side of politicain dhobi who once commented seniors are not fit for T-20, jealous of sachin sucess & also a big politician. Its fasion now days- if india win, give credit to uselss dhobi captaincy & if we loose blame sachin. Though fact is just opposite of it. Sachin- should never play under politicain dhobi captaimcy in T20 .
The way Sachin plays the T20 Tournaments at this age is surprising many cricketing fans all over the world & cricketing fraternities as well. Simple reason is nothing but he want 2 extend his playing of Test Cricket as well one day Internationals.
One thing I am sure that the Finals will B between Mumbai Indians & Royal Challengers not with others.
Just, Note the above prediction pointed by me that no Team can challenge these 2 teams the way they played till date.
Teams like Chennai Super Kings/Kolkatta Riders/ & others will B out of tournament this time.
Mumbai & Bangalore has got their batting depth & Bowling also with good allrounders. But my mind says that, this time it will B "RCB".
Hats off 2 Sachin batting prowess & Kumble's able leadership.
Re: about Tendulkar's play
by swetambar on Mar 26, 2010 08:10 AM
I agree with your prediction, Sachin despite his age,is performing phenomenally well. Yes, we miss that superb cricket genius Anil Kumble now a days
Re: Re: about Tendulkar's play
by ASHISH KUMAR on Mar 26, 2010 03:35 PM
sachin & kumble have always been greatest match winner for india in any format of game & now same in IPL too. Dhobi & dada are just hyped by media otherwise having limited ability as far as cricket is concerned.
mi had 12 players...thanx to badrinath that the mi had to chanse only 180..had badri got out and not scored paltry 55 in 45 balls...dhoni / morkel would have piled at least 80 in those 7 hours...and the target would have propelled to 200 ...we thank csk team for sending badri...... hail to mi...
Re: mi
by ASHISH KUMAR on Mar 26, 2010 03:37 PM
Dhoni is most useless. Rememeber last yr T20 wcup. India lost all 3 matche due to slow batting of dhobi. Strike rate less than 100 in all matches. A real looser. Just made by media & few low IQ fans line u.
Re: mi
by swetambar on Mar 26, 2010 08:12 AM
Cricket is a team game. dont blame one guy in particular. The way sachin and his comrades played even your imaginery score would have been overcome
Re: mi
by Vaibhav Gangal on Mar 26, 2010 09:04 AM
It may be CSK strategy that Badri will hold the fort and give freedom to Raina to smash. Had Badri fell early and string of wickets it would be the small target of 160 to 170. What you say?
Re: Back to Cricket
by s mumbai on Mar 26, 2010 08:00 AM
mumbai to win the final...i doubt whether banglore will be able to retain the moementum after the arrival of the panaoti k.p....he is crap...and is worth only name...his game is rubbish...i banglore have to go lenghth they will need to keep this idiot out and persist with captaincy of kumble
Re: Re: Back to Cricket
by Prabodh Jain on Mar 26, 2010 08:05 AM
hehehe. I like that panoti k.p.
What happened to Camroon White? He is done with Australia and hasn't joined Banglore team yet. Otherwise him and Ross Taylor can make Banglore really solid
Some one here said he was in Ricky Ponting group and not comming to India on security reason..
Re: Re: Re: Back to Cricket
by LG on Mar 26, 2010 08:11 AM
I do not think Camroon white will add any value to RBC. But, without any doubt, Ross Taylor will be an asset to RBC.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Back to Cricket
by Prabodh Jain on Mar 26, 2010 08:15 AM
Based on Camroon White Performace over the last two months, he should add more value then Taylor. Taylor has been out of sort in ODIs and well as Test of lately
