Re: Cricket is physical
by ASHISH KUMAR on Aug 01, 2010 12:12 AM
His physicla & mental response is still better than useless dhobi & his friends all flat track bullies not capable to perform against quality team
Re: Cricket is physical
by C M on Jul 31, 2010 08:33 AM
Cricket is physical for onlookers , For players its mental and physical...Guess who is in which mode... LoL
Ppl just think. How much credit will u attribute for a ODI macth against Bangaladesh, where Sachin makes 100 in first innings and India make 250-270 and India win comfortably? I would guess not much credit to it. Flash-back to 2007 world cup match, Ind vs Ban , India lost that resulted in ousting out of the world cup. India made around 190 and Ban chased it in about 49 overs. If Sachin made a century in that match, it would like the case I mentioned above. Bottomline, every century he made counts irrespective of oppenent,ground and first/second innings. You will know the value of the innings only if it never exists. But players,selectors/commentators know that value.Thats why they redgard him as the greatest player. Clueless ppl can keep barking that he cant win matches.
I fail to understand as to Why K Sangakkara was given MAN OF THE MATCH Award..... {Coz he was a LANKAN----SLC wants the award to stay within SRI LANKA} SRT played a wonderful knock to help INDIA save the match and draw it.....However Sangakarra batted first and posted that score whixh was huge, but the credit should always go to the opposition {if they save or go pass the target set by the opposition} to save the match. And I saw a banner at the SSC which was an open invitation to the master SRT to go past SANGAA.... the person {FEMALE}should know the difference between SRT and KSangakkara. So stupid LANKANS just sit and enjoy the batting displayed by the master and SLC learn to reward the right person instead of rewarding your own player. SACHIN ROCKS.......
