why is god of cricket playing against b'desh...why cant he give oppurtunity to youngster....is sachin so insecure or is he worried about his records been broken by pointing or kallis
Re: Re: why is god of cricket playing
by sachin on Jan 19, 2010 10:55 AM
becz pointing played with ur mom the previous night ...while ur d-ad sachin was hiding against donald & co
Re: why is god of cricket playing
by explorer on Jan 19, 2010 08:23 AM
if there are people who stop doing anything and only think about what to say against Sachin, why cant he do his job (playing cricket)?
Re: why is god of cricket playing
by Talisman on Jan 19, 2010 07:22 AM
Now, Champion teams play at their best whether they are playing a lesser team or a better one. Only loosers think of playing less than their best. Now, where does that leave you?
Re: Re: why is god of cricket playing
by sachin on Jan 19, 2010 11:07 AM
no one is asking anyone to play less than their best ..but we want the best team to be developed . and for that everyone should get a chance...
Re: Re: why is god of cricket playing
by sachin on Jan 19, 2010 07:04 AM
i thought crickets do get retired...or is sachin like politician that he needs to be kicked out.....
Re: Re: Re: Re: why is god of cricket playing
by sachin on Jan 19, 2010 10:58 AM
no no...cricketers should play as long as they want...there should be no retirement .. i think we should call kapil...gavasker... shastriiii
Re: Re: Re: why is god of cricket playing
by Talisman on Jan 19, 2010 07:25 AM
You want othres to listen to you, you have to show some respect and be willing to read others opinion.
You have given no specifics and have not named a player that deserves a chance - because of your performance. You want to get into the indian team, 'cause you want a quota for youngsters that cannot even score a centruy in domestic matches?
Re: Re: Re: Re: why is god of cricket playing
by sachin on Jan 19, 2010 11:01 AM
what about raina...kholi...why cant we try y patan..wbbKH... I AM NOT SAYING TO DROP SACHIN BUT SACHIN CAN TAKE REST ATLEAST AGAINST BDESH & GIVE CHANCE TO THESE YOUNGSTERS... REMEMBER SACHIN CAME AT THE AGE OF 16 BECZ SOME SENIORS WERE REPLACED..WHY CANT SACHIN GIVE OR DEVELOPE PLAYERS FOR THE FUTURE... NOW U WILL COME WITH SOME STUPIT STATEMENTS TO SUPPORT SACHIN..BUT THE FACT IS TENDUA IS STILL INSECURE
Re: Re: Re: Re: why is god of cricket playing
by sachin on Jan 19, 2010 11:02 AM
what about raina...kholi...why cant we try y patan..wbbKH... I AM NOT SAYING TO DROP SACHIN BUT SACHIN CAN TAKE REST ATLEAST AGAINST BDESH & GIVE CHANCE TO THESE YOUNGSTERS... REMEMBER SACHIN CAME AT THE AGE OF 16 BECZ SOME SENIORS WERE REPLACED..WHY CANT SACHIN GIVE OR DEVELOPE PLAYERS FOR THE FUTURE... NOW U WILL COME WITH SOME STUPIT STATEMENTS TO SUPPORT SACHIN..BUT THE FACT IS TENDUA IS STILL INSECURE
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: why is god of cricket playing
by manjit on Jan 20, 2010 08:21 AM
You are right sachin. we should send under 16 team to play against Bangladesh.
Its been shocking that these players have been consistently performing bad, n still end up finding the place in the side. This should be thier last chance to prove. Yuvraj is the most over hyped player. Dhoni is very lucky to have the team which he desires. While Ganguly who changed the Indian Cricket never got the team he wanted. Remember, Sehwag, Kaif, Yuvraj, Zaheer they all prospered under Ganguly. Ganguly always supported these players, coz he knew their strengths. Since the introduction of Dhoni as a captain we saw exit of Kaif, Parthiv Patel, Venu Gopal, Agarkar, n even Sehwag.(sehwag was out of team india for 16months). Ishant, Shreesanth are still learn n learning. Our bench strenght is huge. We have likes of Munaf, Dinda, Tyagi, RP Singh, Agarkar, they all can perform at a given time. Virat is superb n can replace Yuvraj. Dhoni as a caption is wonderful. Sachin is great. Sehwag is world Fearsest. This is no. 1 team (except for new craps, who need to be shown doors).
Re: Yuvraj, Bhajji, Ishant Lucky
by naveen dhanerwal on Jan 19, 2010 06:24 AM
Yup! Agarkar is far better bowler compare to Sree Santh, Ishant Sharma, RP and Nehra; in every aspect, in fielding, in bowling and in Batting. Sree Santh, RP, Ishant all have given runs at an eco rate of 5.5 and their strike rate is too higher than Agarkar. Than what are they doing in the team? Agarkar did well in his last series yet he was not included and never tried again. But look at Santh, ISHANT and Nehra they are in the team ever after failing in series after series!
Re: what would happened if sachin played against india???
by amit tripathi on Jan 18, 2010 09:34 PM
What can someone write about sachin which is not written, discussed or imagined already, by a billion souls?
1) His burden of carrying the expection of a nation with a billion plus population. 2) Delivering more often than not. 3) 20 years of nonstop action at the helm of cricket. 4) Answering his critics in his own style. 5) Inducing self doubt among the world’s best bowlers. 6) Continuing to be the nemesis of all opposition captains even after 20 years of international cricket...
and such a list will grow endlessly, and we would have read every bit of it one hundred times already. So, to write something new and refreshing about the master has become difficult.
Today, I am dedicating this article to those pundits who feel and speak the following thing; sachin is no way near his best, the sweet old days are over, his reflexes has slowed down, he is not a force anymore.
It was here in New Zeal Land, Sachin was first asked to open the innings. I still consider that knock to be the most brutal knock ever played in One Day cricket. In a slow and difficult pitch while chasing a tricky target of 142, the scoreboard read 117/1 out of which 3 were extras and sachin scored 82 of 48 balls with 15 fours and 2 sixes. It has been 15 years since and I have not seen such a knock, Jayasurya, Afridi and Gilchrist have scored quickly but no one as quickly on such a track. The beauty of that knock was all the shots were orthodox cricketing shots. The cover and extra cover field
Re: Re: what would happened if sachin played against india???
by amit tripathi on Jan 18, 2010 09:35 PM
If that Sachin was feared by the opposition captain, this sachin is admired and enjoyed (Read McCullums remarks). If that Sachin was a Hurricane, this sachin is a pleasant breeze, no one realized, how, when and where he scored all his runs. If that sachin was a dictator, this sachin is a magician. If that sachin was a murderer, this sachin is an expert surgeon. That sachin killed the opposition attacks, whereas this sachin analyses and dissects the opposition. If that sachin was an uncut diamond, this sachin is the Kohinoor of batting.
I loved him then as an 16 year old kid, I love him now as 26 year old dad. Times keep changing; even the greats bite the dust. Tyson got knocked out, Richards was troubled and could not score runs as he used to, and many greats lost their fight against time. But, Sachin, God that he is, took a friendly approach with time.
Instead of fighting against time and change, he became friends and took batsmanship to the next level. 43 hundreds and an endless list of awards, has not diminished his passion for this game, he still is a learner of the game. He has evolved, only those species that evolve can thrive in this world, but sachin has taken evolution to the next level. He is the epitome of modern batsmanship. This innings can be used as a tuturial for all aspiring batsman.
Re: Re: Re: what would happened if sachin played against india???
by amit tripathi on Jan 18, 2010 09:36 PM
P.S: I wish sachin and all sachin fans for some of the records that he broke today.
1. Sachin today has become the first man in this planet to score 10000 runs in a teams victory. 2. Second highest score in New Zeal Land 3. Highest ever for a player who got retired hurt 4. Highest score in New zeal land by an Indian 5. Highest score in Christchurch 6. First Indian to score three 150 scores, he is now only behind jayasurya who has 4 (but sachin has the maximum number of 140 scores)7. He increased the number of MOMs today to 58, twelve ahead of jayasurya.
P.P.S: A request to critics: Please find some other reason and point out a few stats and criticize sachin. We need more great knocks from him.
Re: Re: Re: Re: what would happened if sachin played against indi
by amit tripathi on Jan 18, 2010 09:37 PM
P.S: I wish sachin and all sachin fans for some of the records that he broke today.
1. Sachin today has become the first man in this planet to score 10000 runs in a teams victory. 2. Second highest score in New Zeal Land 3. Highest ever for a player who got retired hurt 4. Highest score in New zeal land by an Indian 5. Highest score in Christchurch 6. First Indian to score three 150 scores, he is now only behind jayasurya who has 4 (but sachin has the maximum number of 140 scores)7. He increased the number of MOMs today to 58, twelve ahead of jayasurya.
P.P.S: A request to critics: Please find some other reason and point out a few stats and criticize sachin. We need more great knocks from him.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: what would happened if sachin played against
by amit tripathi on Jan 18, 2010 09:37 PM
Lets have a snapshot of his records~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Highest Run scorer in the ODI 2. Most number of hundreds in the ODI 3. Most number of nineties in the ODI 4. Most number of man of the matches(56) in the ODI's 5. Most number of man of the series(14) in ODI's 6. Best average for man of the matches in ODI's 7. First Cricketer to pass 10000 run in the ODI 8. First Cricketer to pass 15000 run in the ODI 9. He is the highest run scorer in the world cup (1,796 at an average of 59.87 as on 20 March 2007) 10. Most number of the man of the matches in the world cup 11. Most number of runs 1996 world cup 523 runs in the 1996 Cricket World Cup at an average of 87.16 12. Most number of runs in the 2003 world cup 673 runs in 2003 Cricket World Cup, highest by any player in a single Cricket World Cup 13. He was Player of the World Cup Tournament in the 2003 Cricket World Cup. 14. Most number of Fifties in ODI's 87 15. Appeared in Most Number of ODI's 407 16. He is the only player to be in top 10 ICC ranking for 10 years. 17. Most number of 100's in test's 42. 18. He is one of the three batsmen to surpass 11,000 runs in Test cricket, and the first Indian to do so 19. In 2003, Wisden rated Tendulkar as No. 1 and Richards at No. 2 in all time Greatest ODI player 20. In 2002, Wisden rated him as the second greatest Test batsman after Sir Donald Bradman. 21. Tendulkar has scored 1894 runs in calendar year in ODIs, most by any batsman 22. He has the least percentag
Re: what would happened if sachin played against india???
by veerapuram dharan on Jan 18, 2010 09:20 PM
also, one must understand he shd be preferred more for tests than for ODIs..let him directly play the WC 2011 as that will rejuvenate his desire to win the cup..
Re: what would happened if sachin played against india???
by veerapuram dharan on Jan 18, 2010 09:18 PM
well said..sachin baiters shd now understand before he bids adeu..
As usual some people are out to denigrate Sachin. Remarkably on a day when he was the only saving grace in the Indian batting. One guy comes out with about 5 reasons why Sachin sucks. But people can come out with 100 reasons (or at least 89) why he rocks! If we want to find out faults we can find so many in each player. 140 was one of the rare good knock from Ponting in a WC (he didn't have to do much in the other two WC finals), on the other hand had Sachin not played so well in WC03 India would have been knocked out pretty early. Ponting also has a pathetic record (in Test) while playing in India. Inzi has very ordinary (avg 30) record againt the best team of his time, Aus. However, I would rather like to look at the great contributions these people have made for their country and cricket than find out their faults.
Re: Re: @raman siva
by dharmendra jadoun on Jan 18, 2010 09:10 PM
critics are only good when they serve the purpose of allowing the target to introspect and improve
other then that above reason i simply dislike critics as they just increase negativity which is bad for everybody ...
you are unfair ... because you are counting failure of one person and success of another person ... you need to count success of both players or you need to count the failure of both players side by side then you need to comapre
