Indian team should come back from srilankan series If the attitude/thinking is like this then we people of India should boycott the srilankan players. the best action would be to ban Sangakara as well as Randive from even coming to India. Bad persons have this bad attitude and spoils the game spirit in which all people beleive
Re: ban/ come back
by Prasanta Panigrahi on Aug 18, 2010 01:00 AM
Dhoni do not like senior players like sachin, sehwag, dravid etc... He didn't want sehwag's century in last match. He also didn't want that sachin make 200 runs odi against south africa. He is a very good politician. He is very suitable politics instead of Cricket.
No one complains when a batsman refuses to take a single while batting with a number 10 or 11, even when it is available. No one cares when the fielders deliberately let the last ball of the over cross the boundary, so that a lesser batsman can face the first ball of the next over. And everyone cheers a batsman who blocks every ball he faces so that the batsman who is batting in the 90s get the opportunity to get his 100. The why on earth should one make so much fuss about a bowler denying the batsman a 100 aghainst his team, by deliberately giving a run in the form of an extra???
Re: b
by C M on Aug 18, 2010 12:54 AM
I usually dont agree with Bedi ..But he is right this time ...The spirit of the game was very important during his time..and he has proved that THEN..he is the once who got the vaseline strips on ground when john lever was taking wkts after wkts (more than 10 in that match)...Later on John admitted applying vaseline to ball...Bedi prefer not to pursue it to ICC..He did bring the attention of the umpire to the fact though...It would have put Lever in big trouble otherwise...But Bedi showed the sportsmanship then...(I think it was end seventies 77 or 78 Eng toured Ind series)
INDIA supported MURALI to gain 800th wicket in his last International test match. But SANGAKKARA and SURAJ RANDIV played dirty politics against INDIA's hero SEHWAG..This shows how jellous and selfish SANGAKKARA is ! He is spoiling SRILANKA's name which was lifted by great cricketers like SANATH JAYASURIYA and ARJUNA RANATUNGA
Re: MURALI 800 but SEHWAG 99
by sunny on Aug 17, 2010 11:05 PM
What rubbish!! So you mean to say Indians deliberately throw their wickets to Murali so that he can reach 800 mark??
Re: MURALI 800 but SEHWAG 99
by Prasanta Panigrahi on Aug 18, 2010 01:02 AM
Dhoni do not like senior players like sachin, sehwag, dravid etc... He didn't want sehwag's century in last match. He also didn't want that sachin make 200 runs odi against south africa. He is a very good politician. He is very suitable politics instead of Cricket.
Re: MURALI 800 but SEHWAG 99
by suppandi on Aug 17, 2010 11:04 PM
first in place, no one asked Indian team to support Murali to achieve 800th wicket!
yes, sangakkara &co are betrayers and fault lies with our players trusting such idiots dhoni himself is politician in team who tries to dominate over players
Re: Re: MURALI 800 but SEHWAG 99
by Nathan Somas on Aug 17, 2010 11:16 PM
Well, Indians didn't through their wkts to Murali, but what they could have done is when he was on 799th wkt and only one wkt to go, the last pair could have purposely got run-out to deny his last wkt.
Re: Re: Re: MURALI 800 but SEHWAG 99
by suppandi on Aug 17, 2010 11:17 PM
haha yes this was a wicked idea which did not flash for innocent last pair of our batsmen
Re: Re: Re: MURALI 800 but SEHWAG 99
by suppandi on Aug 17, 2010 11:18 PM
haha yes this was a wicked idea which did not flash in mind for our innocent last pair batsmen
Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Salil on Aug 17, 2010 10:42 PM
No offence to dravid fans, i am his fan but the problem is I am a bigger sachin fan. Infact when he declared, ganguly who was not playing then, had bigger role in that decision.
agree Sachin was slow.. not approaching his 200 quick and the declaration was gettign delayed. But in that case a message should have been sent to sachin...score quick..we want to declare etc...
so in the end i still blame Dravid for that. This is amongst the couple of grudges i have against dravid the other for him being the liability in the team as as far as ODIs are concerned especuially in the first half of his career. 2002 onwards he was good ...
Re: Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Atul Kant on Aug 17, 2010 10:51 PM
It seems you were in dressing room to catch the reaction of Ganguly. I am also a sachin fan but I think in that match the condition is like that. BTW India victory is bigger or sachin century,
Re: Re: Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Nathan Somas on Aug 17, 2010 11:20 PM
Hey all looser, every one knows win is the most important factor, those 4 runs of Sachin could have been scored in 1 over, Dravid should have sent a message saying, we are ready to declare please if you want to score you 200 score it, this way Sachin get a chance to do whatever he wants. He was the one scored those 196 runs, doesn't he at lest deserve the last 4 runs, don't even fackin say personal mile stone is not important, I agree, but letting some one score his last 1-2 runs wasting one more over wouldn't have changed the cause of the game. If he would have scored the 200, it would have been his first against Pak and back to back double hundred one after Aus.
Re: Re: Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Prasanta Panigrahi on Aug 18, 2010 12:52 AM
any way all know that dravid is the most selfish player in earth.
Re: Re: Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Salil on Aug 17, 2010 11:17 PM
seems like you didn't watch that match on TV...when the gallery was being shown time and again - ganguly shaking his head walking inside the room..
Else you wouldn't be askign questions like this.
Also Dada wouldn't have admited it was a 'mistake' after the entire epsiode to the media.
I dont know whether you were not born then or are plain ignorant, but next time atleast do some research on internet before puking...
Re: Re: Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Salil on Aug 17, 2010 11:25 PM
"BTW India victory is bigger or sachin century" ... i read some of you other messages pertaining to the recent sehwag - suraj episode and i saw your discontent.
So looks suddenly victory has become less imporatant to you or equal to sehwag's 100?
Re: Re: Re: Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Atul Kant on Aug 17, 2010 11:51 PM
Jalil Bhai,
That was my first blog in the forum. For clarification I never praised sehwag or criticize him.thanks for your valuable advise for searching net even if you do it properly then u discover that I havent written any ghost comment that you read. I know about that match for your kind information sachin score was 194 runs. I already stated I lave and respect Sachin alot. But in my opinion you are another moron of marathi Raj thakrey sena.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Salil on Aug 18, 2010 12:41 AM
lol..Typical indian attitude...when lose on the discussion/argument start hurling personal abuses ..and dragging irrelevant issues
Re: So who is a bigger spoilsport
by Prasanta Panigrahi on Aug 18, 2010 01:03 AM
Dhoni do not like senior players like sachin, sehwag, dravid etc... He didn't want sehwag's century in last match. He also didn't want that sachin make 200 runs odi against south africa. He is a very good politician. He is very suitable politics instead of Cricket.
Re: a tight slap on the faces of all those who think....
by Salil on Aug 17, 2010 10:21 PM
[Edited] A tight slap on the faces of all those who think only Sachin cares for milestones.
And many thought sehwag didn't, even tighter slap on their faces by none other than the man himself.
No people..by hearth this - Everyone, including sehwag, care for the milestones. There is no reason why they shouldn't.
Re: a tight slap on the faces of all those who think....
by suppandi on Aug 17, 2010 10:20 PM
frankly speaking sehwag should not have commented on this
Re: Re: Re: a tight slap on the faces of all those who think....
by sunny on Aug 17, 2010 10:27 PM
Yep, no matter how much he says : I don't care about 100." Fact is everybody does care about it and there is nothing wrong with it. ultimately if someone scores 100, team is going to benefited.
Re: Re: Re: Re: a tight slap on the faces of all those who think.
by Salil on Aug 17, 2010 10:34 PM
true...i dont know why people have problem with it. As if the 100 goes only in the personal account or something.
I agree with you that Dhobi is the culprit here. He should have given more strike to Viru and let him complete the century!! That politician tried his best to deny Sehwag a century!!
Re: Re: @suppandi
by sunny on Aug 17, 2010 10:18 PM
@Sanjay, Don't show your frustration here dhovi lover. You can not change that fact that dhobi is a proven coward.
Re: @suppandi
by suppandi on Aug 17, 2010 10:14 PM
thanks sunny dhoni plays only when franchise pays good, typical politician who retains jadeja in team even after poor performances
Re: Re: @suppandi
by sunny on Aug 17, 2010 10:17 PM
very true and yesterday on a difficult pitch he came @ no 6 to bat coward!! He would have promoted himself had openers gave good start!!
Re: Re: @suppandi
by a on Aug 18, 2010 12:26 AM
dhonis style of play suits filthy cokroaches like you, i hope he plays more and more for his own benefit and you burn blood and bang your head with a stone in frustration
Re: @suppandi
by Sanjay on Aug 17, 2010 10:14 PM
Typical indian homegrown fans or should I say fools! Blame anyone... always blame... doesn't matter win or lose... must blame on a or b or c... laughing stock of the world you lot. Take lesson from the English on how support is done!
Re: Re: @suppandi
by suppandi on Aug 17, 2010 10:15 PM
something wrong with this guy! forget English, at the minimum try to make good use of ur keyboards dude
