A very simple question here. IN USA the negotiating party is entitled to brokerage on any commercial deal.Secondly can some one explain if prices of any commodity which has remained same or come down from 2014 to 2018.
What so ever rate may be , what so ever configuration the fighter had,Congress has no rights to play with the security of the nation just because Congress is not in power and when they were in power, why did they not purchased for Indian airforce.Congress always believed in their own commission first and nation afterwards.Unfortunately the Congress president is immature ( there are many experienced & matured leaders in Congress like Sibal,Kharge,Singhavi etc but they are also helpless.
Re: Rafael deal
by paul theo on Nov 17, 2018 10:25 AM
WHAT DO YOU MEN BY WHAT EVER RATE? THE BJP HOUNDED A GOOD P.M. LIKE RAJIV GANDHI FOR SO CALLED 64 CRORE BOFORS SCAM, NOW THIS IS A RS 40,000 CRORE SCAM RIGHT UNDER OUR NOSE? ALL THOSE FOUND GUILTY SHD BE JAILED AT THE EARLIEST.
Re: Rafael deal
by Indranath Lahiri on Nov 17, 2018 11:14 AM
Exactly! how the offset partner chosen by Rafael(if by their own choice though its fishy)Chaiwala& Co. approved this knowing fully well they don't have any experience is he not playing with the countrys'security.Its an organized loot RAGA has hit the right area.
in this write up is that the Dassault CEO, Eric Trappier, confirmed during the Feb 2015 Aero India show in Bangalore (just 2 months before komaaaali Modi cancelled the 126 Rafale deal between Dassault and HAL) that the price of the fighter in that deal remained the same as from day 1 of the identification of the L 1 bidder !
In other words, he confirmed that the price of the Rafale jet would remain the same regardless of the passage of 3 years !
Re: One of the most significant observations
by paul theo on Nov 17, 2018 10:27 AM
HAL STAFF SHD PROTEST FOR TAKING AWAY THEIR JOBS AND LOOTING INDIANS TO APPEASE SOME RICH GUJJUS
Re: Many fake experts on rediff
by paul theo on Nov 17, 2018 10:28 AM
BLIND BHAKTS DONT LIKE IF THE ILL DEEDS OF THE 2 CROOKS ARE POINTED OUT,THE WHOLE LOOT GANG SHD BE KICKED OUT NEXT YEAR.
Re: Ajai Shukla
by prashant nadkarni on Nov 16, 2018 09:21 PM
I even doubt whether he was military man..his writings are always against our security forces....Failed to understand why he thinks he knews everything about defence
When operation of scales work naturally the cost of 126 wwill be less by 30 percent the writer comfortable ignores bramhos integration....bias political motivation is visible
Re: comparing apples to oranges
by srivathsaa Infotech on Nov 16, 2018 08:20 PM
One question to Author when GOI goes for next trench of 36 what is the saving sir exactly 40 percent......
Ajai Shukla may well be right and has written a very clear pice unlike our politicians. However, he must apply at least a 3 % inflation clause to the prices . After 2012 the prices would have risen by about 12 % by 2016. hence the difference between uPA and NDA pricing will come down.
Nevertheless the NDA still needs to explain the 30 % differential . Can they prove that much superior weapons and avionics were offerred by France in 2015 ?
Re: price comparison
by Kalpendra Oza on Nov 17, 2018 02:59 AM
NDA need not explain anything. Just read the article carefully. He says "while the price of 18 flyaway aircraft is not known" how does he come to total price of Euro 155 million per aircraft? For those 18 flyaway, Congress must have sought bribes in Foreign Exchange since what was to be built locally, if at all, would not have yielded anything for them.
