Re: TAKE OFF anti-social content, court tells Facebook, Google
by Legally Squeezing on Dec 24, 2011 08:25 PM
Anti muslim or anti CONgress is Anti Social!!
What is anti-religion? "I hate all religions." Is this an anti-religious statement? "Hang the corrupts," isn't this antisocial too? (I am speaking of killing?) Indian System is yet to understand that iron-clading is over. WWW has opened a pandora's box, that simply can't be lid. The more they try to repress the more the outburst will be.
Re: Good step by court
by Legally Squeezing on Dec 24, 2011 08:12 PM
When will the court take the next good step of ORDERING the religiousDickheads to TAKE OFF the anti-social content from their religiousBooks??!!!
..in our constitution. Whys shd there be any law against so called "hurting the sentiments"..?? Sentiments getting "hurt" is a highly subjective matter. If someone is ultra sensitive and gets hurt on anything and everything thats said about his belief, whole country shd be gagged to protect his slender "sentiments"..?? And dont the rationalists have any right to get "hurt" with all those false preaching by the believers??
Re: need of the hour - an ammendment
by K PRABHAKARAN on Dec 24, 2011 08:07 PM
Absolutely right, AK. You can say anything about one certain M.K. Gandhi and get away with it. But say something about MGR, Ambedkar, Shivaji, Sambhaji, et al and see the reaction of the so-called "hurt sentiments". Things are going from bad to worse - the events leading to the Universities of Mumbai and Delhi recalling books/articles because they "hurt the sentiments" of a certain section of public are very recent to be forgotten.
Is India following the example of China, in controlling social networks. Kapil Sibbal seems to have been offended by some frank opinions by some citizens of India.
WE HAVE ONLY WAY TO CORRECT GREAT PROBLEMS IN THE NATION - "RIGHT TO RECALL & REJECT" CAN TREAT A LOT OF THINGS AND PUT SO MANY THINGS SO STRAIGHT IN THE NATION.
FIRST - CLEAR OUR LEADERSHIP, THEN CLEAR LOCAL GOVERNANCE AND EVERY SYSTEM.
When political bosses are turning town each and every interest of the people, they have right and the liberty to talk about an ultimate solutions to them.
they can share there thought, express their anger and lift up a ray of justice for them and the nation.
When there is no model of communication with elected representatives and the people get only one opportunity to elect him for 5 year by pushing a button or so, then where is a system to express in the nation.
It doesn't exist anywhere ?
Now when for the first time people are interacting and lively debating the facts and trying to bow their representatives to answer for creating and supporting the system people need, why it is troubling many of them ?!
If our Independentness and the Democracy has not given us the right to express and share our thoughts and only given us an electronic button to push and elect any party man who is not bound to answer us for 5 years after his election, then - surely we are living in a great Jok-Tanra and then we will have to restore it to our acceptable limits whatever the cost it may require well accepted by all.
