ANNA CUD NOT BE TACKLED PERSONALLY AS THEY DID FOR BABA RAMDEV, SO CONGRESS PLAYED DIVIDE & RULE POLICY- HOW IT DID, A SHORT BREAK UP:
STARTED WITH DIGVIJAY SINGH PLOT TO CREATE CLASH BETWEEN ANNA AND RSS- ANNA LASTLY RIDICULED & ABUSED RSS- SO, RSS IS NOT WITH ANNA
RESERVATIOIN TO LOKPAL- SC, ST DIVIDED FROM ANNA, BSP , SP, RJD, LJP SUPPORT THE BILL
MUSLIM RESERVATION-DIVIDED FROM ANNA? (BUT ANYWAY THEY HARDLY SUPPORTED ANY LOKPAL)
Govt citizen charter- a try to help corrupt C grade official- SO LEFT IS SUPPORTING NOW
FOOD SECURITY BILL- THROWING FOOD TO 63.% PEOPLE , SO THEY R NOT WITH ANNA
BALANCE HOW MANY PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE WITH ANNA, U CAN GUESS, FOR ME, ITS NOT MORE THAN 2-5% (MORALLY OR ETHICALLY) THOUGH EVERYONE IS AFFECTED BUT NOW SELFISH POINT HAS COME TO CHHOSE BETWEEN ANNA AND CONGRESS! SELFISH PEOPLE PERCENTAGE IS HUGE AS CONGRESS THROWN LOLLIPOP AS STATED ABOVE, SO THEY WILL RUN FOR THAT, AFTER ALL 1000YEARS WE WERE SLAVE, NOW ITS CONGREZ INSTEAD OF ANGREZ!
DIVIDE AND RULE-BEST CONGRESS KNEW
SO, GOVT WILL NOW EASILY PASS THE BILL IN BOTH HOUSE AND STRONG LOKPAL IS DEAD ISSUE, ANNA MOVEMENT IS DISPERSE AND DEAD NOW!
I am happy to see Indians live according to the teachings of Gita,Vedas,Upanishads,Puranas,Rammayana,Mahbharata,advices of various sages,Rishis,yogis,babas ,local wise old men.Good
Re: ///
by Ram Bharose on Dec 24, 2011 09:09 PM
whats your definition of righteousness - hegemony of upper caste, suppression of lower caste, or a ruthless pursuit of property.
Re: Re: ///
by Zulu on Dec 25, 2011 05:57 AM
it isnt !! at least hindus don't import the concept of the almighty.....and anyway your statement shows the USP that a certain cult uses to sell their cult i.e. increase their cult-members. Do we even need to elaborate
Are we asking to ban those people who are protesting against Gita ? India is so great if people in their country want to kill them like Tasleema Nasrin we might even give them asylum . We are defensive asking not to ban the book since India stands for freedom of speech and exactly for those reasons we gave asylum to Taslima and also didnt object to Salman Rusdie . You see the comparision mistake ? if not clear once again . We are not asking to criticise /punish / ban / kill / the people who asked for a ban of Gita we are only asking to not ban Gita .And if Quran is banned from any country dont worry we will send Krishna to ask them not to ban Quran too ok ? India is greatest country for Muslims where despite you being in minority u have almost equal rights .If in this country Hindus were in minority we know how you would treat us .So please appreciate Indians atleast sometimes dont always criticise and be a cry baby for everything
Re: There is no relation between the 2 comparisions
by Nikhil on Dec 24, 2011 08:48 AM
correction: Please appreciate fellow Indians ( hindus) altleast sometimes . Hindus are magnanimous and believe in co existence
Hinduism is not a religion like others.It ia a way of life and Bhagvad Gita is a text book to succeed in life.Rather banning, every one should read at lest once to realise its importance in our life.
Re: Gita -
by dishkyauow on Dec 24, 2011 01:58 PM
u read it to find flaw... u found it.. u suceeded in ur dharma of being an atheist.. congrats..
actually thats what gita says.. understand what u are supposed to do and do it.. that would be dharma.. dont just be confused and sit idle... thinking about common folk would have been somebody else's dharma.. arjuna was a kshathriya and his dharma was to rule... to rule he had to kill competition which he did.. we all know he was not a saint, he had killed enough earlier... do you think about common mans hunger and stop eating??!! you might have if you were a saint and abstained from worldly pleasures because thats a saints dharma..
Re: Gita -
by Ram Bharose on Dec 24, 2011 08:04 AM
I want to however protest any ban on any book. whatever a book says it can't be banned.. There has to be freedom of speech..There is always something to learn from every book..
Re: Re: Gita -
by Jena Bharati on Dec 24, 2011 08:10 AM
freedom of speech, friend, is the name of the game. i am afraid you would not like it. Look around and ask this toyour fellow religionist.
