Discussion Board

'Ayodhya judgment is clear: We have to co-exist'


Total 534 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Coolfi
Confused Muslims !!!
by Coolfi on Oct 18, 2010 11:29 PM  | Hide replies

-- great to see that some Muslims are suddenly so intent on preserving the Indian constitution. Before this they wanted Sariah law only claiming that it was given by God

-- suddenly they believe that law trumps faith. We thought they were carrying out political murders all over the world in the name of faith !!! :(

-- they say Ram is a x lac year "myth". I say, Boss, stop bluffing and say what you feel in your heart -- that Ram is a form of devil worship (like some US pastor said recently). We all know what you really feel from your murder and persecution of Hindus all over the world.

-- Congress (closet Hindu haters) and communists come up with very emotion concepts of Hindu tolerance. To me Hindu toleration of Muslim stance on Ayodhya -- is nothing but a form of weakness of beggars.

-- Congress kept quite when Hindus were finished in Pakistan and Bangladesh. In fact they kept quite when Hindus were finished in Kashmir. I don't think they have business commenting on Hindu religious issues.

-- I think Masjid cannot exist in Ayodhya -- it is a like a dagger through Hindu hearts. The days of Muslim rule of India are over (maybe they can rule West Bengal again :)).

-- We need a Ram temple in Mecca. Only then we should allow a Masjid in Ayodhya.

-- If India is not Saudi Arabia, then Indian Muslims should quit acting like Arabs.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sadhan Pande
Re: Confused Muslims !!!
by Sadhan Pande on Oct 18, 2010 11:38 PM
A.'Ayodhya judgment is clear: We have to co-exist' its a broad minded statement ,coming from one section of muslims!
B.I doubt if all sections of muslims hold the same opinion!
Because of the judgement,
they ( section B)may have to swallow it, but
unless its from their hearts and the secularly posing Govts., troubles can start any time!
Discusions must take place on that account!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
satya.vachak@rediffmail.com
Re: Confused Muslims !!!
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:38 PM
first decide Ram was king or god..

there has been tendency to worship just king by its subjects.

just see the definition of mythology u ll find the answer.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Rationalist
Re: Re: Confused Muslims !!!
by Rationalist on Oct 18, 2010 11:44 PM
That is none of your concern. He is an Indian icon.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rationalist
Re: Re: Re: Confused Muslims !!!
by Rationalist on Oct 18, 2010 11:45 PM
We cant make way for Arabs for Indians. This land belongs to Indians.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
this that
Re: Confused Muslims !!!
by this that on Oct 18, 2010 11:38 PM
HINDU TOLERANCE IS IN FACT A WAY TO HIDE ANTI HINDUS AND PROTECT RIGHTS OF PRAYING ON RUINS OF TEMPLE.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
thinkingaloud
Yes Sir,
by thinkingaloud on Oct 18, 2010 11:29 PM  | Hide replies

Support your views on that, and we all hope and pray that we can live together in peace. Enough of fighting and bloodshed on Religion. We have to all realise that Religion is for living and letting others live else it has totally failed. The courts verdict is something beautiful in its own ways and helps us move forward. May God Guide us and show us the right path.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
accounting master
Re: Yes Sir,
by accounting master on Oct 18, 2010 11:32 PM
gods have ditched us no ones coming back HASUS or MADA_MAD



   Forward   |   Report abuse
thinkingaloud
Re: Re: Yes Sir,
by thinkingaloud on Oct 18, 2010 11:38 PM
See anything in life has to stand a test. And these too are testing times. Lets hope we get over it and move on.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
l
Re: Yes Sir,
by l on Oct 18, 2010 11:32 PM
I agree to you completely.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
accounting master
Re: Re: Yes Sir,
by accounting master on Oct 18, 2010 11:34 PM
hello i for isflam , even aloo is a non existent entity

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
thinkingaloud
Re: Re: Yes Sir,
by thinkingaloud on Oct 18, 2010 11:37 PM
Lets not dig fun or gun man. Lets live properly. We have had too much. I hope Muslims too come together on this part.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
l
Both Hindu and Muslims have to co-exists
by l on Oct 18, 2010 11:21 PM  | Hide replies

Both Hindu and Muslims have to co-exists, there is no otherway.
I hope some amicable solution is found to this issue.
Else we should wait for the Supremene Court judgement.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
accounting master
Re: Both Hindu and Muslims have to co-exists
by accounting master on Oct 18, 2010 11:24 PM
for a Mus1im to live in a non-Mus1im dominated area is as difficult as it is for a fish out of water.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Both Hindu and Muslims have to co-exists
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:29 PM
a m, and in maj0rity of 1zlamic countries, it is like fish in the frying pan!!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
this that
Re: Both Hindu and Muslims have to co-exists
by this that on Oct 18, 2010 11:24 PM
WHY WE CAN ALL DECIDE ON SOMANATH WAY.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Mahesh Kulkarni
Re: Both Hindu and Muslims have to co-exists
by Mahesh Kulkarni on Oct 18, 2010 11:25 PM
Correct! This issue must be resolved out of court. The Supreme court judgement will be final and the parties who are saying that they will abide by this cant be trusted now! High court judgement was just a step not final! If supreme court judgement satisfies one party and makes other party upset then the consequences will be difficult to handle.In the interest of Peaceful India both parties should sit together and amicably solve the issue putting aside their EGOS !
It is the need to Hour!
Jai Hind!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
JGN
Re: majoritarian aggorance
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:22 PM
Who has differentiated? There is no b1asphamy law in India like your Land of Pure. Equality before law is guaranteed by our constitution.


What have you got to do with a m0sque bui1t by an AfghanInvader? In what way are you related to him?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
sun vin
Re: @satyaVachak
by sun vin on Oct 18, 2010 11:18 PM
god cannot hide also like a coward, is lalallah male or female?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
satya.vachak@rediffmail.com
Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:20 PM
thy is more precise than he/she

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
satya.vachak@rediffmail.com
Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:25 PM
ignorance is mother of all evils..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
satya.vachak@rediffmail.com
Re: @satyaVachak
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:22 PM
God can be worshipped anywhere.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:27 PM
Then why you guys are going all the way to the arrabian deserts for circum-ambulating a structure??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:28 PM
And if g0d can be w0rshipped why you guys want a m0sque at
Ayodhya?????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
satya.vachak@rediffmail.com
Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:33 PM
b'cause it's property of mosque

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:41 PM
There was no re1igion called 1zlam till M0hd was about 40 years. Then the all the m0sques all over the w0rld bel0ngs to the natives of those p1aces. Do you agree with this also???

Forward   |   Report abuse
Rationalist
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by Rationalist on Oct 18, 2010 11:42 PM
But y do you need it in first place?

Forward   |   Report abuse
Rationalist
Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by Rationalist on Oct 18, 2010 11:29 PM
Then why do you need a Masjid? Is that not an 1d01?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
JGN
Re: Re: PlSSLAM
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:16 PM
Rehan, what good is there in your re1igion? Apart from the menace of terr0rism, there are any number of common crimina1s also (disproportionate to the percentage of population).

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Megellan myself
Re: Re: PlSSLAM
by Megellan myself on Oct 18, 2010 11:16 PM
your ancestors were our people. your religi0n has made you our enemy. Everybody is an enemy to "pisslam".

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: PlSSLAM
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:18 PM
Now they identify with those who committed unspeakable atr0cities on their ancest0rs and consider other natives of our country as enemies. That is called "StockholmSndrome".

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rehan Alam
Re: Re: Re: PlSSLAM
by Rehan Alam on Oct 18, 2010 11:25 PM
Firt you abuse some one's religion, and than you expect him to be calm and behave nicely. How silly,We are proud to be MUSLIM, respect in done mutually.... Dont think that we are in minority you can crush us easily. as one of you has rightly said we are from you.... So how could you expect from us to tolerate injustice and abuses.............

   Forward   |   Report abuse
this that
Re: Re: PlSSLAM
by this that on Oct 18, 2010 11:17 PM
AND WHY ARE YOU SILENT ON AIMPLB STAND ON RAM TEMPLE NOT EXISTED BEING ANTI HINDU?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
jatinder nayar
Faith
by jatinder nayar on Oct 18, 2010 11:08 PM  | Hide replies

How can a beliver of one faith acused the beliver of another faith and tell that his faith is a myth while the one he practices is real. The same can be vice-versa

    Forward  |  Report abuse
satya.vachak@rediffmail.com
Re: Faith
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:13 PM
you shud ask judge sharma..


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Anuraug Rathor
Re: Faith
by Anuraug Rathor on Oct 18, 2010 11:11 PM
Well that's called Congress secularism...get used to it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
this that
Re: Faith
by this that on Oct 18, 2010 11:10 PM
THIS IS EXACTLY WHY IT IS BECOMING DANGEROUS DAY BY DAY AFTER REPEATED ANTI HINDU UTTERANCES

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Victor Johri
Not the final judgement
by Victor Johri on Oct 18, 2010 11:00 PM  | Hide replies

Its not the final judgement. People should wait for thr Judgement of the Supreme Court. We have seen in the Karnataka case how judges differ. Anyway people must try for a negotiated settlement for better co-existance.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
shh Ten
Re: Not the final judgement
by shh Ten on Oct 18, 2010 11:20 PM
judgement will come someday for a grand metro station at Makka

   Forward   |   Report abuse
siddharth
Got good deal for musloms
by siddharth on Oct 18, 2010 10:57 PM  | Hide replies

Instead of original 2.77 acers of land now they will get 1/3rd of the total 67 acers. Still they cry and left, congress project this as loss for M

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sun vin
Re: Got good deal for musloms
by sun vin on Oct 18, 2010 10:59 PM
This fellow is a lier, they are afraid to admit that the temple was demolished to build a mosque.....cowards.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
satya.vachak@rediffmail.com
Re: Re: Got good deal for musloms
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:02 PM
who is liar ...


who said Ram appeared in mosque in 1949

whole thing is based on lie, deciet and coercion

i don't know how can people find spirituality in it..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
satya.vachak@rediffmail.com
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Got good deal for musloms
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:11 PM
god is not human being.those who born can not be god. because god cannot die.
so by definition he is from minus infinity to plus infinity.


Forward   |   Report abuse
sun vin
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Got good deal for musloms
by sun vin on Oct 18, 2010 11:13 PM
god cannot hide also, is lalallah male or female?

Forward   |   Report abuse
Naveen Haldhar
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Got good deal for musloms
by Naveen Haldhar on Oct 18, 2010 11:28 PM
who? would you elaborate?

Forward   |   Report abuse
Rehan Alam
Re: Re: Re: Re: Got good deal for musloms
by Rehan Alam on Oct 18, 2010 11:08 PM
Yes ALLAH exists like BHAGWAN exists...... in fact both names are given by us....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
this that
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Got good deal for musloms
by this that on Oct 18, 2010 11:11 PM
ALLAH IS ALSO A PRE MOHMMED WORD. STOP BLUFFING.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Naveen Haldhar
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Got good deal for musloms
by Naveen Haldhar on Oct 18, 2010 11:26 PM
Yes if you talk like this then you are supposed to be a real Mus*lim.

Forward   |   Report abuse
this that
Re: Re: Re: Got good deal for musloms
by this that on Oct 18, 2010 11:05 PM
COMING FROM SOMEONE WHO PRAYS ON RUINS OF TEMPLES, THIS MAKES NO SENSE

   Forward   |   Report abuse
shh Ten
Re: Got good deal for musloms
by shh Ten on Oct 18, 2010 11:21 PM
we hindus need at least 2770 acres

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 534 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message