against the evidence in favour of religion sentiments... what if this going to be the trend in future ... then there will be no trust in judiciary .... today it is favour then tomorrow we may be at receiving end
Re: Re: Who was the real father of Ram ?
by Coolfi on Oct 19, 2010 12:05 AM
Awesome insight! It's so easy to completely floor the weak logic it's almost sad :) But I doubt Allah reproduced sexually -- it was asexual like Amoeba ...
Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by thinkingaloud on Oct 19, 2010 12:05 AM
Interesting observations I mean you should consider renaming yourself - Rajnikanth DishkaoDishkaoDiskhaoNhamThoSuhnaHOGA
Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by JGN on Oct 19, 2010 12:12 AM
Bira, the principles of Budddhism (panchsheel and eightf0ld parth) are much more refined than the principles of any other re1igi0n.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by sushil jha on Oct 19, 2010 12:34 AM
has to be every incarnation of Vishnu has made the world more holier and peaceful, and so have been done by Buddha....
Re: why a coomie scum HARAMEEE ROY is concerned
by Rationalist on Oct 19, 2010 12:00 AM
They are psuedo-Seculars commies. They are helping to convert West Bengal into Bangladesh soon.
Re: Re: @satyaVachak
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:59 PM
Yes; the ign0rance that there is ony ONE life. Death is THE end. The funfulled Paradiiise existed only in the fertile imagination of some sur-realistic visi0naries. The poor fellow could not think of any thing other than w1ne,w0men,water,fruits,etc even in the Paradiiiiiise!!!
Yet another bone headed interview by a rediff journalist who is hell bent on proving that he is secular. What sort of question are these? "How do you explain a situation that went so badly against the Muslim side?" and "Do you believe that Waqf Board Lawyer Zafaryab Jilani made a blunder or was he manipulated?". The questions were designed to put words in mouth of the moron on the other side of the table. if rediff wants to become another "The Hindu", so be it. Atleast don't act that you are some kind of a balanced news outlet.
Re: bone headed
by sumit kumar on Oct 19, 2010 12:01 AM
this mofo and his organisation are pseudo secularists. They will probably like islamic India. I wish there was a blanket ban on rubbish journalism. I heard someone, earlier I didnt want to be journalist because I thought it was a tough job. Now I dont want to be a journalist because I will look stupid. And how apt words!!
Re: Co-existence is possible ...
by sumit kumar on Oct 19, 2010 12:03 AM
If you remove RSS and VHP from the equation, only one party will exist and you know which one!!
Re: Co-existence is possible ...
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:44 PM
Peace cannot prevail on planet earth till people get rid of their obsession with a funfilled life here-after. First of all these p00r guys have to be taught that there is only one life and there is no life hereafter. Death is THE end. Nothing survives death.
Re: Re: Co-existence is possible ...
by Coolfi on Oct 19, 2010 12:00 AM
Completely correct!! No one ever proved the existence of God -- Buddha said that after trying plenty of meditation. He was intelligent and used his own mind. Death is final. You become part of the earth after death -- nobody has been able to prevent the bacteria yet (including those bogus "miracles"). These irrational and unreasonable sons of Abraham and their hanger-ons in India -- with immense amount of blind hate of "the other" as their core beliefs -- will go to the extent of killing to fulfill their faith. Allowing their shrewd political moves -- disguised as religious moves -- to triump will result in people suffering like they did in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Kashmir (ignoring NE for now) where they got exterminated and the survivors got converted to beggars.
Re: Re: Re: Co-existence is possible ...
by Haramohan Roy on Oct 18, 2010 11:47 PM
Wow ... sleeping with Dinosaurs!! Thanks for this terribly good example!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Co-existence is possible ...
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:50 PM
Birds, anima1s, reptiles, etc are not allowed in the Paradiiiise; only menw0men,w1ne,water,fruits,etc are available there!!!!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Co-existence is possible ...
by Haramohan Roy on Oct 18, 2010 11:59 PM
JGN, if there is no chips or bhujiya found in the paradise, then I am willing to forego my place in the heaven in favour of you! I am contented with my life with wine and chips and bhujiya at my home in Kolkata!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Co-existence is possible ...
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:54 PM
Nothing is said about such things!! You can have some cherry or furit chat with w1ne.
Re: Re: @satyavachak
by Rationalist on Oct 18, 2010 11:43 PM
But why do you need it in first place? You can worship anywhere? Is smelleing one another's a555es compulsory for you?
Re: Re: Re: @satyavachak
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:45 PM
it's about unity of mankind, where human from all races , nationalities become equal before god..
Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyavachak
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:47 PM
No, only those who w0rship your jea1ous westasiang0d are equal for that eneity. More than 80% of the w0rld's population are "rightful 0wners of he11 fire"!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyavachak
by Rationalist on Oct 18, 2010 11:49 PM
Yeah. We are seeing unity in all pissful countries by blasting each other in Masjids. And wach on truth.tv how kids are trained how to b-e-h-e-a-d fellow followers.
Re: @satyavachak
by JGN on Oct 18, 2010 11:46 PM
He is number on b1uff master. He is talking about the n0nsense of m0n0thesim, forgetting that the real fight is between the followers of three int0lerant WestAsianRe1igions (and all of them claim the same ancest0ry - AdamAndEve)!!!!
Re: Re: @satyavachak
by satya.vachak@rediffmail.com on Oct 18, 2010 11:50 PM
no one is superior over other.. brahaman has got no superiority over dalit and vice versa. but those who believe in rascism in form of casteism will not understand this. Basically unity of god also implies unity of mankind. multiple god divide mankind..
Re: Re: Re: @satyavachak
by Rationalist on Oct 18, 2010 11:55 PM
Monopoly of God is much more dangerous. It is another form of slavery.It is against freedom of expression. You know what Swami Vivekanada told when some one asked how many Gods should be the limit, Vivekanada replied "there should be as many Gods as there are human beings". God is a perception and with Monotheism all you are doing is to impose your perception on others.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyavachak
by Rationalist on Oct 19, 2010 12:03 AM
When there is a choice there can't be any slavery. Slavery and Monopoly are two faces of same coin.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @satyavachak
by Rationalist on Oct 19, 2010 12:05 AM
For 1ndus there is no compulsion unlike yours. So where is the question of slavery?
