Discussion on 'Ayodhya judgment is clear: We have to co-exist'

@ Bira Pandy
by JGN on Oct 19, 2010 12:44 AM | Hide replies

His name is "1smael". TheSonB0rntoAbrahamAndSara'sServant". Even theirRe1igionGotItsNameFromHim!!!!

Forward | Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator

Re: Re: @ Bira Pandy
by JGN on Oct 19, 2010 12:49 AM
IDChorsunvin, first go ank your m0ther whether ske knows who yourfatheris!!!

Forward | Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator

CO EXISTANCE
by salim salim on Oct 19, 2010 12:44 AM | Hide replies

For Indians it is co existance.
For Muslims it is only a property dispute.
For Hindus it is an ego issue inflated by sanghies fanning the flames of hatred for political gain of a few affluent class.
For the court it is a dilemma between ego and fact.
For constituion it is a blank spot none of the visioneries never thought of the need of 8 lakh old myths interfering modern legal system.

Forward | Report abuse

Re: CO EXISTANCE
by p on Oct 19, 2010 04:33 AM
good analysis. however, it is not just the sanghies unfortunately many muslims view it as a ego/religious issue as well. Creating an issue out of a dilpidated mosque where nobody used to worship and which has no religious significance.

Forward | Report abuse

Re: CO EXISTANCE
by JGN on Oct 19, 2010 12:46 AM
ModernHumanebings did not exist before 8 lakh years!!!! 1zlam is just over 1400 years 0ld.

And if it is only property dispute, accept land at any other place and close the chapter.

Forward | Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator

Re: Re: Re: CO EXISTANCE
by JGN on Oct 19, 2010 12:53 AM
That is the be1ief of the followers of WestAsian literatures. TheirD1cklessG0d created only one AdamAndEve. HerSonsFkkedHer for planet earth to get populated!!!!

Forward | Report abuse

Sensible message
by nzboy handsome on Oct 19, 2010 12:34 AM | Hide replies

I have always seen hatred in rediff’s forum, but thought for a change today will be different as the topic was about co-existence. But I am shocked to see senseless comments again.
As they say some things never change. I am sure most of us in this forum are educated enough to understand that this is all about politics. Hindu vote bank and Muslim vote bank.

Forward | Report abuse

Re: Sensible message
by Jena Bharati on Oct 19, 2010 07:47 AM
you are deliberate confusion master. It is much more than vote bank for hindus.

Forward | Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator

Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies

Message deleted by moderator

Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies

Message deleted by moderator

Typical Congress mentality!!!
by suryanarayan bhaskar on Oct 19, 2010 12:27 AM | Hide replies

Manmohan Singh Should remember that he is only a caretaker Prime Minister untill the righful heir takes over.All Indians should remember that we are all only Praja and should not argue with the Kings and rulers of India. Nehruji, Indiraji, Rajivji, Soniaji and Rahulji have been the greatest rulers in the History of India and all Indians should be indebted to them to whatever they have given us.All indians should be ready to gve our lives so that they can rule India.We shouls also welcome the new Princess Veronicaji and we wish her all the best so that she can become our Rani and rule us.I think the time has come to change the name of Inddia to NehruDesh as calling it Hindustan or Bharat is disrespectful to our rulers.

Forward | Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator

Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies

Message deleted by moderator

Re: Re: Why did Sita e!oped with Rav@n and got prgnant?
by JGN on Oct 19, 2010 12:30 AM
He had no stamina. He got only second hand or third hand materials through out his 1ife (except for one Chi1dBride)!!!

Forward | Report abuse

Message(s) deleted by moderator not displayed on this page

Click here to view messages reported for abuse

NewsRediffmailMobileBlogsBook a DomainBooksRediffmail NGMoneyRediffmail ProiShareLocal AdsShoppingBuzz

Discussion Board	'Ayodhya judgment is clear: We have to co-exist'