Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by Samir sharma on Jul 31, 2010 10:28 AM
polulation at time of independence in 1947: 30 crore, 3 crore muzzies (10% od total population) population in 2010, 122 crores, 25 crore muzzies , 25% of total po[pulation isnt it interesting ... who ruled the coubtry ? congress for 45years out of 62 years of independence , isnt it intresting?
Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by Wahaj Faridy on Jul 31, 2010 11:04 AM
U dummy...Why you ask for Source/reference from a Hindutva activists?
dont you know thy fart such foul Info out of their a**.
Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by hanif muhammed on Jul 31, 2010 11:25 AM
25/122 according to your own calculation it is 20.49 percent. So nearly 5% is pani... :) 27 Cr has become nearly 100 Cr .. a near 4 fold increase i.e the same land and resources is to be distributed by 4 more today than in 1947..
Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by Ramandeep Judge on Jul 31, 2010 11:35 AM
This is factually incorrect and invented figures, a typical RSS propaganda. For ur information the highest population growth in last census was among poor, lower caste Hindus in Bihar and eastern UP.
Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by X on Jul 31, 2010 10:31 AM
What is the source of your information. All the stats available show muslims are 13% of the population. And the population problem is due to hindus because they are 85% of the densely populated India.
Re: Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by madan menon on Jul 31, 2010 10:46 AM
you are totally wrong hindus are not 85 percent, they form only 81-82 percentage..in fact the percentage of majority is coming down rapidly, where the percentage of minirities are galloping..this is A FACT.
Re: Re: Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by Aatif Husain on Jul 31, 2010 10:54 AM
well, its easy to say that its a fact but what is the evidence ? The census doesn't put the population of muslims more than 13%. Wild guesses are not good enuf.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bom
by X on Jul 31, 2010 11:04 AM
well said. Its just fear mongering. What these guys really want to do is the create an atmosphere of distrust between the different communities of India. Lets say that by some magical spell all the Indian muslims convert to hinduism, even then these guys will find some point of difference to create distrust between human beings.
Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by afzal aziz on Jul 31, 2010 11:07 AM
Stop ur blatant lies. If the muslim mughal rulers realy wanted a islamic country, they would have done it in an instant and india would nt have been predominantly a hindu country after centuries of muslim rule.
Perhaps shout in front of your RSS/VHP office so that they will garland u!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by Ajit Bhatt on Jul 31, 2010 11:25 AM
don't be under day dreaming that muslims were rulling whole of India at any given point of time when Congress in not able to rule even in modern era. There are countless acts of bravery of individual hindu rajas who have contributed for survival of hindu population. Muslims rulers were having only one agenda to islamised India. Atleast Hindus are not buying your ridiculous arguments of ruling India seeing status of your generations. If Muslim rulers were so powerful than show one Muslim country where without blessings natural resourses they have come up at world stage and contributed to world society any meaningful. Fact of matter is Muslims rulers and community at large is only beleieve in free lunch and don't want to work hard.
Re: Re: Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bombs
by X on Jul 31, 2010 11:29 AM
I dont think, all the rulers were same and everyone had a religious agenda. For e.g. Akbar created a religion of his own. Some were only interested in wealth, some only in land etc etc.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: India shuns treaty banning deadly cluster bom
by Ramandeep Judge on Jul 31, 2010 11:38 AM
Absolutely. Every ruler had his religious agenda. For example sikhism grew rapidaly during the rule of Maharaja Ranjit Singh.
Re: Re: some day in the future
by Vijayan Malliyoor on Jul 31, 2010 09:16 AM
Can take with a pinch of salt! Thousands of innocent Tamilians were maimed, killed or made destitutes in Sri Lanka during the civil war and the whole world knows it. It is immaterial whether it was due to the LTTE or by the military for the poor victims. Cluster bombs should be banned. I fail to understand why the government which preaches allegiance to our great 'Father of the nation'who during his life time exhorted every body to follow "Ahimsa" is opposing its ban!
Re: Re: some day in the future
by syed isaqi on Jul 31, 2010 09:42 AM
fastest growing cancer is not islaam, but poeple who spread hatred and enimity, irrespective of religion. Better kill them than killing poeple of other religion. Atleast we will have hope of getting peace
Re: OF course India will not sign this
by kalyan guha on Jul 31, 2010 08:42 AM
Who is speaking of Human Rights violation now? Lanka? whose army is now in international dock now for the state sponsored ethnic cleansing of Tamil civilians?
Re: Re: OF course India will not sign this
by a m on Jul 31, 2010 08:53 AM
Substitute "mankind" for "Sri Lanka".
When last did mankind in general act in a civilised manner during war ?
Maybe long before the Roman Empire, or the Trojan War, or some mythological war.
An enemy is something that needs to be destroyed, period. So in war we all simply think of how to destroy them, how fast we can do it, and how completely. The manner of their dying is not the uppermost thing in our minds at the moment when we try to kill them.
All human DNA is nearly identical, and we all have nearly the same genes. Of course the genes for pretending and taking up a high moral ground during show offs and debates, is also included in the human genome.
We forget one potential good use for cluster bombs. Why can't we round up all the politicians and mak them stand in the middle of the desert in Rajasthan and then get the airforce to drop some cluster bombs from the air. We just have to make sure we don't leave out anyone from any of the parties.
Re: They are useful
by a m on Jul 31, 2010 09:05 AM
You'l need more cluster bombs than the manufacturers could possibly make.
India has about 1.4 billion politicians and would - be politicians. Moment you kill the current politicians, there will be new ones who had been waiting for a chance to grab the goodies.
