If we were to divide mankind into three groups, the founders of culture, the bearers of culture, the destroyers of culture, only the Aryan could be considered as the representative of the first group. From him originate the foundations and walls of all human creation, and only the outward form and color are determined by the changing traits of character of the various peoples. From the Vedic Age till today he has provided the mightiest building stones and plans for all human progress and only the execution corresponds to the nature of the varying men and races. In a few decades, for example, the whole of Asia will possess a culture whose ultimate foundation will be Hellenic spirit and Aryan in technology, just as much as in Europe. Only the outward form-in part at least-will bear the features of Asiatic character. It is not true, as some people think, that Japan adds European technology to its culture; no, European science and technology are trimmed with Japanese characteristics. The foundation of actual life is no longer the special Japanese culture, although it determines the color of life-because outwardly, in consequence of its inner difference, it is more conspicuous to the European-but the gigantic scientific-technical achievements of Ancient India before the Islamic invasion, Europe and America; that is, of Aryan peoples.
Only on the basis of the achievements of these peoples can the Orient follow general human progress.
During one hour bombing of city of Dresden he killed over 60,000 with ten thousands bombs. There was not even oxygen to breath and most died in very few minutes. Had there been no world war II he would have done same to the people of India for standing up for Independence. SHAME ON COLONIALISM AND IMPERIALISM.
Re: Church-ill had said Indian are worst than animals
by P R on Dec 06, 2010 09:07 PM
Churchill was documented to be anti-semitic. He only got into WW2 because he was a war monger... not because he wanted to saves the Jewish people. He contributed to the deaths of both Jews and Bengalis.
Churchill was a thorough bred racist in the quintessential English Tradition.
English education in those days forced you to be a out and out racist if you were a Briton and forced you to hate your own guts if you were an Indian or any of the non-white peoples of the empire.
That is the truth and nothing but the truth.
Churchill fought Hitler out of spite and jealousy and NOT our of concern for Humanity as it is generally believed.
He had total and visceral contempt for Slavs, Gypsies, Jews, Asiatics, Native Americans, Aborigines and Africans in the true English tradition. His many works of literature are proof of this.
Even today this is how the common British mind thinks !
But he just positioned himself and England in such a way so that Germany could not gain supremacy in continental Europe.
Let us explode the myth of churchill created by the brits.
Why consider him to be such a great man? He was a vainglorious racist of the first order.
It is a mistake to call him great. For Britons of course he was a great man, but from an Indian viewpoint, he was a pompous and overbearing personality.
Also, even if someone from their own elite turns out to be a good human being,
and says that bad things were done by their "heroes", that person will be shunned, criticised and/or ostracised.
See what they are doing to Julian Assange, when there is SOLID proof in front of their eyes.
Instead of actually reading the leaked cables, they are busy vomitting venom borrowed from a few sociopathic politicians.
So this book is basically for Indians, and internationally, foreign policy and sociology students/professionals, people with an interest in history, and the few 1000s (or lakhs) of good people in the West who possess empathy.
Cannibalism in desperation comes from eating meat daily. Many of them proudly claim that if it can be eaten they have or will happily eat it - even dog meat and ape meat (bush meat, the best example)
So when they are desperate, cannibalism is simply one small step of rationalisation away - Look, I need to live, I eat all meat, so if I eat just one human meal, I can survive.
Then the man finds that the next meal is also difficult to get, so eats the next human meal.
The scene is then much like Resident Evil / zombie movies - one man is eaten and a crazy hungry mob of zombies share the spoils.
Just like vampires are fictionalised porphyria victims, maybe zombies are fictionalised crazed cannibalism victims.
The main difference that distinguishes Churchill and Hilter is that Churchill was on the winning side, but both were otherwise were quite similar. Both were arrogant, pompous, arrogant and racist white supremacist who had backing of large part of their respective population. Churchill escaped scrutiny as history is written by the victor, and a majority of British elite as well as general population and their Anglosaxon kith and kin that populate North America were just as racist as Germans. Even today this latent racism exists, and it is overt manifestation as neo-Nazi and other violent racist parties exist across the world that would not hesitate to nukes dark-skinned people. One has to acknowledge, and that is from firsthand experience, that racism had seen rapid decline among the Anglosaxons till the rise of Izlaamic fascism seen in this decade. Izaamic religious fascism has ignited latent fascism and given racism new lease of life.
Re: Differences between Churchill and Hitler
by P R on Dec 06, 2010 09:15 PM
Islamic fascism is supported aggressively by the british government. They serve the same purpose as the taliban for the Pakis. British neanderthalism and islam are indistinguishable. Strange allies in today's day and age. Just watch Cameron condemn Pakis in Bangalore and shake hands with Paki leaders the next week.
indians are a far superior race and vegetarianism is a higher stratum of evolution. no offence meant to others. death is but a natural consequence to indians as it was for many milleniums engrained into our minds. anything that has to do with harming others to survive ourselves was seen as repulsive..... this theory of karma and the fruits that we get out of it is in our blood and genes.... other civilizations cannot possess this as they can never match indians in this sophistication.
i wish the author all the luck. and will try to get a copy of this laborious work of her.
Not after 50 years of his death..but right now..so that Indian people can garland him with the deserving material..and can be caned and stoned in broad day light..
Re: Re: Re: Re: History
by max skinner on Dec 05, 2010 10:47 PM
Israeli politicians plus the media owned in US as well as financial institutions in US (Goldman Sachs et al).
Re: Re: History
by kabir on Dec 05, 2010 03:30 PM
you must remember one thing though. whatever happens in the world good or bad there is always a jew connected and usually he is at the top.:-)
Re: History
by prabir sengupta on Dec 05, 2010 01:45 PM
And here comes another New Nazi...so what you think!!...both Hitler and Churchill had no brains and they were kids playing something the Jews want them to play!!!...And the Jews were such a big fool that they orchestrated a game that ends in exterminating millions of them!!! You know mate, people like you makes earth a more and more difficult place for mankind to live in....There is no difference between Al-Qaeeda and Churchill and Hitler...all are the same side of the coin...just terrorism had become more sophisticated from the time of WW2 and now...essentially the mind set is same...and all of them are religious/caste or creed fanatic with a sense of skewed regionalism to the extreme...the only reasonable place for these kind of people is mental asylum...those who practices it and also for those who doesn't have the guts to practice it but believes and preaches it and airs their comment....you all are mentally sick...
Re: Re: History
by max skinner on Dec 05, 2010 03:07 PM
Continue believing buddy that Hitler was the main cause of Jews misery and also that Santa Claus exists plus there will be world peace...
Re: History
by iamnotlegend on Dec 05, 2010 01:21 PM
You are partly right and partly wrong. Jews were not so stupid and desperate to support hitler in killing millions of jews just for a little bit more money, when they were already the richest ethnic community in europe at that time.
However it was the jewish americans who dragged US into the war against germany,japan by provoking japan to attack US. Japan bombed pearl harbour becos the US navy under the influence of jewish political lobbies on the US president,blocked supply lines to japan and its troops in the pacific, knowing that japan in an act of desperation will attack US and give it an excuse to enter WW2.
