Indian govt should remove article 370 and let other indians settle there. Let these stone pelters die daily and their women folk can be taken care of by the army and other patriat indians same way the mnuzie invading armies did to the native kashmiris from 500 years ago. They killed the native fighting men and taken their women and these current breed of traitors were born. Let the history repeat for the better of india
Re: Remove article 370
by SURESH S on Aug 10, 2010 02:30 PM
In a way, this is what China did to its protesting regions over a period. Instead of sending the army, they sent Chinese to the regions of Tibet and some autonomous regions. Gradually the local people were outnumbered by the settlers till the time came when there were lesser people to protest. India should at least send unemployed peole from other states to work and settle in Kashmir where they can contribute to the local development also.
All u kashmiri muzzies who want Azadi, go back to ur ancestral lands, kashmir is a hindu land and the names itself comes from hindu saint. Even srinagar is a hindu name. so f off from kashmir,that is not your land.Go to central asia or arabian deserts from where ur plundering ancestors came.
Taken from the comments on Deccan Herald website: Kashmiris are unique in complaining and rejecting the truth. They are unique in committing violence and crime and yet playing innocence. They are unique in creating gaps and instigating the divide in the state and with the Indian people. They are unique in taking law into your hands and virtually disrupting the normal lives of Kashmiri people. They are unique in feeling victimized while leave no opportunity to victimize others (read Kashmiri Pandit). They are unique in reaping benefits from India and yet rejecting the Indian state. And lastly They are unique in demanding the so-called azadi from India and while selling the same to Islamic fundamentalists, Pakistan and China
Re: Re: Truth is always bitter
by balsu shekar on Aug 10, 2010 12:10 PM
yeah where were u when kasmiri pandits were killed u speaking like a innocent human being first know the truth then u debet do u justify those blady terrorists feel brave when they kill the inocent people
Re: Re: Re: Truth is always bitter
by sara bano on Aug 10, 2010 12:15 PM
and do you feel brave by quiting away rather than facing the situation..u love ur lives more than ur homeland..and pandits were driven out by the then governor JAGMOHAN..everybdy knows the reality..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Truth is always bitter
by sara bano on Aug 10, 2010 12:41 PM
u 2 better not hurt our sentiments..and stay away..i respect humanity above all nations
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Truth is always bitter
by sara bano on Aug 10, 2010 02:10 PM
respect for "humanity" is above my self "respect.."Allah hafiz dear pandit
Re: Re: Re: Re: Truth is always bitter
by balsu shekar on Aug 10, 2010 12:53 PM
and ur free to occupy the lands then u didnt protest coz ur getting it free of cost wht the blady hell were they doing cant u people support the pandits then were all of u sleeping first u know the realty sara . and iam really feeling shame coz of u . every indian knows the truth
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Truth is always bitter
by sara bano on Aug 10, 2010 02:09 PM
cowards cant be stopped...and we cant fight for thm while they enjoy outside state..take cre..God bless u..and gv u proper vision
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Truth is always bitter
by balsu shekar on Aug 13, 2010 11:55 AM
we all know who r the cowards just becoz of few people like u eat here and shout for them
Re: Re: Re: Re: Truth is always bitter
by balsu shekar on Aug 10, 2010 12:55 PM
and u better dont hurt the indian senitments . u dont have the right to hurt urself sara
“India needs azadi from Kashmir as much as Kashmir needs azadi from India.” The Kashmir conflict refers to the territorial dispute over Kashmir, the northwesternmost region of South Asia. The parties to the dispute are India, Pakistan, China, and the people of Kashmir.
Let India free to claim actual kashmir and eventually go for referendum. Thank U Bacha log No more E-Motinal Blogging respect humanity not relegion -region-etccc
Re: Free India & Indians
by rr on Aug 10, 2010 12:26 AM
Taken from the comments on Deccan Herald website: Kashmiris are unique in complaining and rejecting the truth. They are unique in committing violence and crime and yet playing innocence. They are unique in creating gaps and instigating the divide in the state and with the Indian people. They are unique in taking law into your hands and virtually disrupting the normal lives of Kashmiri people. They are unique in feeling victimized while leave no opportunity to victimize others (read Kashmiri Pandit). They are unique in reaping benefits from India and yet rejecting the Indian state. And lastly They are unique in demanding the so-called azadi from India and while selling the same to Islamic fundamentalists, Pakistan and China
Despite the fact that Kashmir was never a property of either India or Pakistan and there can be no question of deciding the fate of Kashmiris without their consent, Kashmiris were, ironically, ignored in the dialogue between New Delhi and Islamabad to resolve the Kashmir dispute. However, it is a good gesture that both the countries have realized the importance of Kashmiris representation in the dialogue process.
The problem of Kashmir would only be resolved through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite. But holding of Plebiscite with only two options (union with either Indian or Pakistan) is not now acceptable to the bulk of Kashmiris. The ideal solution for Kashmiris, as Prof. Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema of Pakistan asserted, would be an "independent status for the entire state of Jammu and Kashmir". Steps like starting a bus service from Srinagar to Muzaffarabad, laying down railway lines, or giving hefty economic packages won't solve the problem of Kashmir. Both India and Pakistan should make U.N Resolutions the basis of solving the problem. U.N. resolution, after all, was responsible to ultimately solve the international disputes in South Africa and Angola. India and Pakistan must keep the interest of Kashmiri people paramount and take serious and resolute initiative in order to make things better for the common mass of Kashmir and settle the Kashmir issue once and for all.
Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by CRISTA on Aug 09, 2010 10:12 PM
BTW, for your kind information, UN is a dead and impotent organization. They could not stop any attacks on any middle eastern countries. UN resolution has been rendered invalid and useless. Please stop beating a dead horse. There is no problem to resolve. This a law and order problem which India should handle and tackle firmly. Kashmiri are spoilt and think rest of India and Indians owe them something. There latest pathetic trick includes using the killing of the 7 year boy as an excuse of showing to the "world" that human rights violations are committed. I have a news fr these rotten people especially the parents: SHAME ON YOU FOR USING YOU 7-YEAR OLD CHILD JUST TO MALIGN INDIA. Really- shame on you. What was the child doing outside in curfew? Please do not tell me that the 7 year old wanted Kashmir to be independent or Pakistan. Science shows 7 year old brain is not fully developed to think about such issues. The brain develops only after 18-20 years to make rational decisions. These stupid people try to show how the children of Kashmir want Pakistan. You stupid morons, invent a new trick and don't coax and brainwash you minor children. The hatred will continue to burn them from inside.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by rr on Aug 10, 2010 12:26 AM
Taken from the comments on Deccan Herald website: Kashmiris are unique in complaining and rejecting the truth. They are unique in committing violence and crime and yet playing innocence. They are unique in creating gaps and instigating the divide in the state and with the Indian people. They are unique in taking law into your hands and virtually disrupting the normal lives of Kashmiri people. They are unique in feeling victimized while leave no opportunity to victimize others (read Kashmiri Pandit). They are unique in reaping benefits from India and yet rejecting the Indian state. And lastly They are unique in demanding the so-called azadi from India and while selling the same to Islamic fundamentalists, Pakistan and China
Re: Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by sara bano on Aug 09, 2010 10:57 PM
house arrest ur child just for one week and i will award you...our children hace been house arrested for 58 days
Re: Re: Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by sara bano on Aug 09, 2010 10:59 PM
brain develops after 18 years agreed...justify why then 7 year old child was beaten till death..u insane..ur wrds are reply to u urself
Re: Re: Re: Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by sara bano on Aug 09, 2010 11:06 PM
if child had underdeveloped brain armen forces were not insane to beat him till death????
Re: Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by sara bano on Aug 10, 2010 10:15 AM
OTHER OPINION A silent shame
It’s almost as if he doesn’t know or care, writes Karan Thapar
‘ If 50 people were shot dead by the police on the streets of London what would the British government do?” This sharp question was how Pertie greeted me on my return from Britain last week. I mistook his inquiry for levity but he soon cut me short. “ Would Cameron keep silent, appear unconcerned and unaffected, or would he fall over himself explaining and apologising?” I realised Pertie had an important point to make. Whatever the cause and the necessity, how should an elected government — and, more specifically, an accountable prime minister — respond when security forces in Kashmir end up killing the very people they’re intended to protect. But before I grappled with his question I tried to deflect it. “ The CRPF did not intend to kill,” I began. “ They were forced to shoot to control rampaging crowds. And remember they were themselves under attack. They were being mercilessly pelted with stones.” I think Pertie snorted. At any rate he seemed to dismiss my response with contempt. “ What do you mean they didn’t intend to kill? Do you know that almost every single one of the 50 people killed were shot above the waist? Many were shot in the head. And remember the protestors
Re: Re: Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by sara bano on Aug 10, 2010 10:16 AM
OTHER OPINION A silent shame
It’s almost as if he doesn’t know or care, writes Karan Thapar
‘ If 50 people were shot dead by the police on the streets of London what would the British government do?” This sharp question was how Pertie greeted me on my return from Britain last week. I mistook his inquiry for levity but he soon cut me short. “ Would Cameron keep silent, appear unconcerned and unaffected, or would he fall over himself explaining and apologising?” I realised Pertie had an important point to make. Whatever the cause and the necessity, how should an elected government — and, more specifically, an accountable prime minister — respond when security forces in Kashmir end up killing the very people they’re intended to protect. But before I grappled with his question I tried to deflect it. “ The CRPF did not intend to kill,” I began. “ They were forced to shoot to control rampaging crowds. And remember they were themselves under attack. They were being mercilessly pelted with stones.” I think Pertie snorted. At any rate he seemed to dismiss my response with contempt. “ What do you mean they didn’t intend to kill? Do you know that almost every single one of the 50 people killed were shot above the waist? Many were shot in the head. And remember the protestors
Re: Re: Re: Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by sara bano on Aug 10, 2010 10:17 AM
Many were shot in the head. And remember the protestors were only throwing stones. Is shooting to kill the best, leave aside the only, way of tackling such protests?” Pertie’s argument seemed difficult to counter. I sensed the need for a tactical retreat. So I quickly changed subjects. “ Why do you ask how David Cameron would handle a similar situation in London? What’s that got to do with things?” “ Because our prime minister, Manmohan Singh, hasn’t said a word. Literally not a squeak. It’s almost as if he doesn’t know or care. Or as if Kashmir doesn’t count or isn’t part of India. I simply can’t fathom this silence. It’s inexplicable.” “ Well,” I said, startled by this sudden realisation. “ Perhaps he doesn’t want to further inflame matters by saying anything. Perhaps in the circumstances silence is the most sensible course of action.” “ You can only say that because you’re not a parent. But if your kids were shot dead by policemen and the government had nothing to say you’d be livid. These were innocent children.
Some of them were not even teenagers. And yet the government can’t bring itself to express regret!” Once again Pertie had me stumpe
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by sara bano on Aug 10, 2010 10:19 AM
And yet the government can’t bring itself to express regret!” Once again Pertie had me stumped. Democratic governments need to respond to such tragedies no matter how difficult, tricky or sensitive. Silence is never the answer. “ But what should the PM have done?” It was a genuine question.
“ Express deep regret, share his anguish and even, yes even, apologise.” “ Apologise?” My tone clearly conveyed my surprise. “ What sort of apology do you mean?” “ Even when something is essential and unavoidable you can apologise for having to do it. But in this case killing young people was neither essential nor unavoidable. It was gratuitous and uncalled for. So an apology is all the more necessary.” I suddenly remembered that Singh apologised in Parliament for the Sikh killings of 1984. Even after 20 years he felt the need to do so. He wasn’t in anyway responsible yet this is what he said: “ I bow my head in shame.” Today, in contrast, when he is the PM, he is silent. For all intent and purposes his head is held high. I wonder how the people of Kashmir — and, in particular, the parents who’ve lost their sons — feel when they notice the difference? ( The Hindustan Times)
Re: Resolution to Kashmir
by rr on Aug 10, 2010 12:26 AM
Taken from the comments on Deccan Herald website: Kashmiris are unique in complaining and rejecting the truth. They are unique in committing violence and crime and yet playing innocence. They are unique in creating gaps and instigating the divide in the state and with the Indian people. They are unique in taking law into your hands and virtually disrupting the normal lives of Kashmiri people. They are unique in feeling victimized while leave no opportunity to victimize others (read Kashmiri Pandit). They are unique in reaping benefits from India and yet rejecting the Indian state. And lastly They are unique in demanding the so-called azadi from India and while selling the same to Islamic fundamentalists, Pakistan and China
Re: Fact sheet Of Atrocities On Kashmiri Pandits
by Oye Kake on Aug 09, 2010 08:51 PM
Who did this? This are certainly not the common public; but planned by millitants so that you misread a common Kashmiris and distinguish them in the name of religion and consider them same as millitant bcoz of their religion....you are no different then them.
400,000 Kashmiri Pandits, constituting 99% of the total population of Hindus living in Muslim majority area of the Kashmir Valley, were forcibly pushed out of the Valley by Muslim terrorists, trained in Pakistan, since the end of 1989. They have been forced to live the life of exiles in their own country, outside their homeland, by unleashing a systematic campaign of terror, murder, loot and arson. Genocide of Kashmiri Pandits has reached its climax with Muslim terrorism succeeding in 'CLEANSING' the valley of this ancient ethno-religious community. With the completion of 11th year of their forced exile, this peace loving, culturally rich community with a history of more than 5000 years, is fighting a grim battle to save itself from becoming extinct as a distinct race and culture The Jammu and Kashmir Government and Government of India have failed squarely to protect the Kashmiri Pandits againstIslamicterrorism.
Jammu and Kashmir being the onlyMuslimmajority state in whole of India, the protection of minorities and their living peacefully, in their homeland, is crucial for India to remain as a Secular Democratic State.
Ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Pandits (Hindus) from Kashmir valley is the crucial failure of Indian state to uphold its commitments to people of India as enshrined in Indian constitution which provides right to live with dignity and honour to every citizen irrespective of caste, creed, religion or colour
Representatives of Glorious Heritage And Legacy of Kashmir Symbols of Brotherhood and Peace Kashmiri Pandits have always been devoted to spritual and academic pursuits.
They have during their history of more than 5000 years nurtured values of peace, co-existence and tolerance.
They are the original inhabitants of Kashmir.
Kashmiri Pandits are progenitors of Kashmir Shaivism the philosophy of oneness of mankind.
Hinyan and Sarvastivadin sects of Budhism found highest expression in Kashmir and Kashmiri Pandits spread their message to China and Central Asia.
Kashmiri Pandits have contributed immensely to the evolution of human thought by contributing to almost all fields of creative human endeavour like literature (mainly Sanskrit), language, science and philosophy from times immemorial.
Since the adventofIslam in 14th century, Kashmiri Hindus have been subjected to extreme persecution. To escape religious fanaticism in the form of forced conversionstoIslam they had either to embracedeath or leave Kashmir more than once during the last six hundred years.
Present exodus of Kashmiri Pandits is fourth mass exodus in the history of Kashmir since the adventofIslam in this part
