The most overhyped actress of all times is Aishwarya rai... She is carrying her "i'm so tender " image too far.. and whats worse the avg indian man even buys that crap..She is a good looker ..period .. not an actress by any standards
Re: "overhyped ash"
by strange heart on Jun 25, 2010 04:25 AM
somehow i tend to agree!! se is lucky that media never writes anything against her. this shows that she is a very good buiness woman!!
seriously speaking we are not paying to watch a discovery channel documentary in a film. In nat geographic they show these wonderful locations.
Where is the script? Where is the screenplay? The most used screen play of revenge for her sisters rape? and please there are far more good stories in ramayan to consider. After watching the film i think if anyone has money can take a film with stars, create so much hype and still after 3 days running think its good. Just go in the theaters and see the reactions of people when they come out? Mani sir, If you have asked me 200 Rs i would given you 500 rs for the work in the films you had shown before but if i had really the power i would come to your home and collected the money i had spent on this movie, but the time cant be got back.? Its better the film stars shut their mouth about the script. It shows how much afraid they are this film will flop at box office.
hey guys as expected, this non-actor vikram career has nose dived badly and today it is the birthday of superstar of south, vasool mannan, dr. vijay. lets celebrate.
Re: raavanan flops miserably at the box office
by nandha C on Jun 22, 2010 10:40 AM
Sincerely can you please tell me in which movie you can see vijay's film acting.
Re: Re: raavanan flops miserably at the box office
by sura on Jun 22, 2010 10:53 AM
poove unakaaga, TMT, tamizhan, friends, sachein, priyamanavale,kadalakku mariyadhai, once more, nenjinile, ghilli, pokkiri etc etc. And for ur info, vijay was the first amongst this generation actors to be awarded with the prestigious "kalaimamani" award way back in 1997.so i believe that satisfies ur question.
Re: Re: Re: raavanan flops miserably at the box office
by Janardhan on Jun 22, 2010 11:54 AM
I have already gone mad watching the crap movies you had mentioned.
Re: Re: Re: raavanan flops miserably at the box office
by Akhil Chandran on Jun 22, 2010 02:24 PM
Good info.. First time, I m hearing somebody telling Vijay is an actor.. and that too better than Vikram.. Good joke dude.. Vikram is in the range of some one like Kamal... So be proud to have somebody like that from your area, instead of telling Vijay as an actor, he can be a star.. but not an actor.
Re: Re: Re: raavanan flops miserably at the box office
by HateLoveMyTeam on Jun 24, 2010 04:12 AM
Vijay is the worst actor from this generation. worse than bollywood actors.
Re: Re: Re: raavanan flops miserably at the box office
by vimalan sadhasivam on Jun 23, 2010 07:13 AM
Mr. Sura, you have better sense of humor than your boss Vijay. unless you are paid him, i don't understand how you have got the guts to go and comment about your stupid hero in each and every forum, that too comparing with someone like Vikram. with your constant msgs, you are basically doing a disservice to your hero. Hope that guy will never come to acting. Thats my wish on his birthday.
Re: Re: Re: raavanan flops miserably at the box office
by k k on Jun 22, 2010 12:53 PM
We are not talking of 10 year old film, what was the last hit by Vijay and when it was?
Sura is not even a pura!
Let him first act before you guy start workshiping him. I feel Vadivelu has bigger presence than Vijay today.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: raavanan flops miserably at the box office
by yoges on Jun 24, 2010 01:28 PM
dun compare vijay wit vikram. n u r saying dat raavanan is a flop. 1st of all c how vijay's last 6 movies did at bo. then comment bout others. although raavanan is not doing well at the bo, the film is just awesome n vikram was excellent
I think people don't like the Bachchans as they are so perfect! Does any one realize that Shah Rukh performs the same any kind of movie, over acting melodrama. That's why he is good in "Om Shanti Om"
Re: Raavanan's Vikram and Prithviraj 1000 TIMES better than Raav
by Indian on Jun 23, 2010 01:27 PM
Both the versions are bad, Vikram in Hindi was pathetic and if that is a great acting, wonder U guys will worship him as a hero in Tamil version.. the movie sucks big time. A Tamil will see any shit in Tamil and praise it, but others are not fools
Re: Re: Raavanan's Vikram and Prithviraj 1000 TIMES better than
by Janardhan on Jun 24, 2010 02:13 PM
don't fool arond....pls watch the tamil version and then comment.
A dud movie in Hindi...but Vikram's performance makes the Tamil version great.
If you cannot appreciate...buy burnol and antiacid tablets.
Re: Re: Re: Raavanan's Vikram and Prithviraj 1000 TIMES better t
by melvyn joachim on Jun 25, 2010 07:05 AM
a movie connects with an audience because of the screenplay,characterization etc.if both movies are similar in that aspect from start to end how can one be better than the other. Face this fact, the movie is boring (read non-engaging, non-entertaining). You guys from TN just cant stand the fall of your icon Mani Ratnam.Look at his record in bollywood where his movies are judged by 27 other states. Except for Guru all other movies bombed.watch movies of vishal bhardwaj,anurag kashyap, dibakar banerjee,shekhar kapoor....you'll know what screenplay means !!
