One guy is yelling...How much he yell from the top of wynad hills it is not going to be accepted in Indian history...because in every nook & corner of India you can see a lot stories like this only the place & name will be different!!!.....
I see that u have resurfaced again with ur tall claims. Just coz I havent been answering does not mean that we have forgotten how the last time around u had to swallow ur claims.
I repeat, I had given facts and evidence with the source of my knowledge including a site authored by a direct descendant of Thomas Baber. What evidence do you have which is stronger than that that proves that the Raja did not exist and is a fictitious character ?
Either u can go on bluffing like this (which will only prove to the rest who dont know till now that u r ignorant) or else give solid evidence (that is "the formality and the way to argue" - ur own dialogue). Just keeping on harping that he does not exist does not make any sense.
Re: Re: To Anto
by sanath on Oct 24, 2009 12:59 PM
In fact I am daring you to say that Thomas Harvey Baber also did not exist ! If you say he didnt, that will show everyone the level of your ignorance - and if u agree that he did, then I dont think u can comment more authoritatively than he did about the Raja's existence or his bravery !
Come on, accept either one if u feel u really have evidence on ur side - let us see what is that evidence which is stronger than what Thomas Baber has written !
Get ur facts right dude before talking nonsense authoritatively !
