Great article! Thank you for sharing these points as they have helped me understand your blog better. Your writing skills make things extremely clear, while I was reading the article I felt as if someone was teaching me, everything is explained very well. Kindly share more write-ups as these help us a lot and such articles add on to our knowledge. Thank you! Model Shaurya Pratap Singh
Great article! Thank you for sharing these points as they have helped me understand your blog better. Your writing skills make things extremely clear, while I was reading the article I felt as if someone was teaching me, everything is explained very well. Kindly share more write-ups as these help us a lot and such articles add on to our knowledge. Thank you! Model Shaurya Pratap Singh
apart from the performances of rahul bose and kay kay menon being great, the plot is poor copy of A Few Good Men.. please watch the original... the first half of Shaurya is boring and miniisha's overacting gets on the nerves.... if i'd known it were a copy, i wouldn't have wasted my time watching it... overacting by rahul bose and miniisha in the first half though Bose improves in second half. Menon is good throughout but can't beat Jack Nicholson in the original.. the original movie was gripping throughout.. Shaurya, au contraire, is frivolous in the first half and suddenly all the answers come in the 2nd half and it's funny the way Menon's character reveals all without in-depth probing by Bose's character, almost felt like they'd got tired of shooting and wanted to end it all too quickly. my take is that if you can't improve an original, then just make an exact copy!
RE:RE:watch the original instead!
by J P on Apr 21, 2008 04:22 AM
I concur. If someone has watched "A Few Good Men", one might not appreciate it. Although, the plot has been doctored to fit bollywood, the script is loose. Had the film makers put more effort, they could've come up with a better product. The only positive about the movie is K K Menon.
RE:watch the original instead!
by on May 15, 2008 12:37 AM
even though this movie was a "copy" it still had a little bollywood sence. Rahul Bose and Maniisha did pretty good. Personally, Id give this movie a 4! One ything the direstor missed was when Menon had brought out the truth in a sort of vengence. The director didnt graspe the moment between the rising hatred to reorganizing himself and asking the panel to leave. There should have been better emotions even though Menon has played his part with great personality! NO OFENCE PPL!!!
Aise movie banane walo par deshdroh ka case hona chahiye. Movie dekhe ke he lagta hai tht they don't know anything about INDIAN ARMY. SHAURYA HAI INDIAN ARMY
RE:RE:DESH DROH
by saurabh on Apr 13, 2008 10:11 PM
what about the other side Mr Ahmed where terrorists the world over hide amongst civilians putting innocent lives at risk ? What about the fact that the job of the army is made that much tougher and dangerous because of these tactics.
India has allowed a movie showing how army can abuse its power, is any movie coming up in muslim countries showing the other side, where terrorists use civilians as shields.
RE:DESH DROH
by pratap singh on Apr 14, 2008 12:06 PM
what do u really mean Computer? Have they shown anything untrue about the army? did they get some fundamentals wrong there or what? just curious.
Shaurya is an anti-national film and deserves to be banned. While taking sides with his Muslim brethren, Samar Khan conveniently forgets why the Indian army is in Kashmir in the first place. Over the years, thousands of brave soldiers have laid down their lives defending Kashmir against the misguided jehadis. Instead of singing paens to the glory of these bravehearts, Samar Khan strikes a belligerent note, pandering to the palate of ISI-sympathisers. Levelling accusations against an army officer of the level of a brigadier, Samar Khan establishes that he is nothing short of a terrorist himself. What about the innocent Kashmiri pandits who have been forced to leave their homelands, fed up of the Pakistan aided and abetted terrorists. A while back there were reports of the torture inflicted on peace-loving Kashmiris by jehadis, their eyes being gouged out while they were still alive. This is the state of affairs in Kashmir and all Samar Khan can talk about is a few miniscule cases.
RE:BAN Shaurya
by abhijit bhattacharyya on Apr 09, 2008 01:02 PM
these guys do not in the lest care about communalism.they lack imagination.how do i end my movie???a have no idea...why not,all happened because of communalism.they are not trying to raise awareness about communalism,they are trying to sell it.
RE:BAN Shaurya
by abc ghi on Apr 14, 2008 05:20 PM
people like samar khan never think bout india.They think bout there own community.They don like making film on kashmiri pandits.They cant c terrorist killing our army men.
