Hi, Syed Firdaus Ashraf: hope you have seen the movie. I didn't see any analysis on the film, in general you sadi a few words which I can write after watching the trailer in TV. Many people will eagarly wait for the review now a days before getting in to theatres, hence you should take your profession very seriously, if this is not your profession, forget it and get out of it...please...
Something is seriously wrong.....i dont know why all good movies are under-rated. Aaja nachle is a fantastic movie. Especially with Madhuri in the movie, u just can't miss her onscreen. she has again proved that no one can beat her.
Madhuri is a living legend i dont think hit or flop matters to her much at this point in her career she has accomplised everything that any movie industry has to offer ( name, fame & money ) Her doing a movie is sort of treat to her fans i think if she wanted she could have donr a a 100 % full masala entertainer but she chose to pleasure her fans with this dancing musical
RE:aaja nachle
by Siddhartha Sanghi on Dec 04, 2007 06:17 AM
abey kayeka career... she is finished... this shitty film is the proof of that... madhuri was no one by herself if aamir, sanjay, and salman weren't there to accompany her... they are actually the ones who made her a star otherwise there is not a single film that madhuri has able to survive by her own power...
RE:aaja nachle
by Nimmi on Dec 04, 2007 08:07 AM
really????? so, was the Madhuri only actress whom all these stars accompanied. What abt Juhi, Manisha and Gracy Singh? i think they too worked with all of them....do anyone else has a status like madhuri? you idiot ! its only talent that matters and not the accompanying stars.
Excellent Movie"Aaja Nachle" with good music and art story.Perfect comeback of Madhuri.Her acting,dancing and performance is amazing. A lovely movie to watch again.
RE:Aaja Nachle review
by anand awasthi on Dec 04, 2007 06:19 AM
You are perfectly alright. Movie has a brilliant script...it's an art movie, not a commercial one.
By Shawna. Sorry I completely disagree with Firdaus, all these above mentioned movies by Yash Raaj banner except for Ta Ra Rum Pum were quite good, may be they got lost in the sea of hundreds of sub standard movies and music albums, hindi film industry should pay attention to quality rather than quantity.
RE:Review of Aaja Nachle by Firdaus
by gakkad on Dec 04, 2007 03:44 AM
You said --these above mentioned movies by Yash Raaj banner except for Ta Ra Rum Pum were quite good--
Congratulation you survived through jhoom barabar jhoom !!!! you must be made up of steel nerves. Because no one could have survived 3 hours inside theater watching that POS.
SRK Is living Legend. He is pure Entertainer...Madhuri had her days but not as big as SRK and never will be. Please please dont compare SRK with anyone..he is in his own league of greatness...A TRUE ENTERTAINER
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Saagar Bhatia on Dec 04, 2007 01:58 AM
SRK has yet to prove himself in several categories of acting, other than his traditional run of the mill.....romeo roles which he does sleepwalking. A legendary actor is one who plays all kinds of roles with equal amazement like AB..... when SRK does a Don, a Black, a comedy like Amar Akbar Antony with equal magnitudes of success, he will become a legend
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Om Shanti Om on Dec 04, 2007 02:35 AM
what abt swades and chak de? chak de was a hit with no known heroine..can AB ever achieve that? OSO is as hilarious if not more than Amar Akbar Anthony..stop living in the past...appreciate SRK for ur own good.
RE:RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Arya on Dec 04, 2007 02:46 AM
Swades was a flop at Box Office.... and regarding Chak de....it was not superhit it was just a hit... and My dear frnd OSO was even unable to collect as much as John Water collected.... Collections for John Ebrahams water was 5 million and OSO current collection is 3 million in US.. and OSO is already dies at box office here... Indian collections too repeat the same story....Now SRK cant even be ccompared to John in case of acting.. John is much much better that SRK and AB is GOD in bollywood and SRk is not even human.... how ccan both be compared... be matured buddy.....
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by anand awasthi on Dec 04, 2007 06:23 AM
OSO is the worst movie I have ever seen. SRK has only a few good movies in his name....His overacting and hehehehee sucks....
RE:RE:RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by on Dec 04, 2007 04:34 AM
To Arya: Om Shanti Om collected 319056995 Rupees and according to Yahoo.com's currency converter, that comes up to $8,062,084 which is the same as 8.062 Million dollars, and that is only in 3 weeks. So before you make any stupid claims you better do your research!!
RE:RE:RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Arya on Dec 04, 2007 02:50 AM
And I Agree Madhuri cant be copared to SRK... coz Madhuri is at too high on acting talent front and SRK even dont know ABC of acting....I feel pity on u guys how can u like SRK.. he is pathetic actor.... i have seen promos of OSO it pathetic....
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Jignesh Shah on Dec 04, 2007 03:09 AM
SRK did act well in Chak De but still not comparable to Madhuri when it comes to overall performance. Look at Dil To Pagal Hai... Madhuri was all over the film and left over areas belonged to Karisma. Even in Devdas, Madhuri blew SRK with her comparatively shorter role.
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Neelam K on Dec 04, 2007 02:46 AM
chak De was a hit coz of the script and not the lack of heroines. Plus every person played in the team did a very good job in their first film itself! Grow up.
RE:RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Mridul Sharma on Dec 04, 2007 09:42 AM
SRK has never been able to get his critics silenced for his lack of acting skills. He is successful actor for he has powerful friends, all his movies are big budget. Remember his guddus and ramjaanes. He cant act anger, remorse, cant dance, average looks. He is getting bigger because of acquaintance with chopras, johars, khans. The guy needs more exposure to offbeat films.
RE:RE:RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Mridul Sharma on Dec 04, 2007 09:50 AM
Madhuri was never known for acting ever as far as I can remember. People knew her for her dancing. That also faded, see Dil to pagal hai. An unexperienced dancer like Karishma is giving the so called dancing legend run for her money. Compare Ash with her in Devdas, she is looking fat compared to ash's chiselled look. She didnt leave acting, she did not have much takers for her movies, all her movies were finding their way to trashcan. Thats when she got married. She has come back not for her fans but to have money. She is not a dancing veteran, she knows only filmi latke jhatke, no class with western. Compare her to the likes of Roshan and the girl from Kisna, she has nothing new to offer. Phew!!!
RE:RE:RE:RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by dan cody on Dec 04, 2007 10:51 AM
are you kiddind me!!!. go see movies like mrityudand, lajja, devdas, raja, sailaab, DTPH, anjaam and many more of her famous hits and then compare. please dont talk like an illiterate.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by romesh tyagi on Dec 04, 2007 03:04 PM
you seem to be pretty much obsessed with madhuris dancing but only dances do not make or break a film....a film should have entertainment value which only srk has been able to provide for the viewers consistently untill now.....i know some people think its cool to be different but the truth is that all over the world if there is any actor from india who cn carry a film on his shoulders then its srk.....
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Mridul Sharma on Dec 04, 2007 11:29 AM
Mrityudand had a backdrop like that, lajja was a woman oriented movie and the other movies are not worth talking about. No class, see Ek hasina thi, Nana patekar in the movie with mukul dev and Madhuri, Hrithik roshan in many of his movies, Amitabh bachchan in Baghban. That is acting, not some Devdas and Raja. Who is illitrate now.
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Ramelton Pandya on Dec 04, 2007 03:10 AM
Chak De was ahit because of Tax Free Status. Dilwale was a kajol Movie Karan Arjun was a Rakesh Roshan Movie KKKG was AB and Kajol and Hrithik Chalte Chalte was Rani Mukerjee
I am just trying hard to rememeber an exception to all above.
It hs to be OSO. That is truly a SRK hit. One in 20 years, big deal. Call yourself anything but box office pundits know the real story.
RE:RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by romesh tyagi on Dec 04, 2007 03:16 PM
if you have such pathetic views on movies and srk why nt keep them to yourself.....how can kkkg be neone else,s movie if srk and ab gave the best scene in the end....we are not talking about monoacting here are we???srk has been consistently making xtremely watchable movies for a very long time.....almost all the people you mentioned above have had their biggest hits with srk but the vice versa is not true.....none of them has had the capacity to carry a film on their own shoulders as srk does....including the so called legendary AB,....when it comes to pure star power and mass appeal nobody can beat srk and you better accept it cos thats the truth....
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by Tapobrata on Dec 04, 2007 04:00 AM
SRK is Great so as Madhuri... I think SRK haters have somepsycho problem. Please consult good doc.
RE:Why are people comparing Sharukh khan to madhuri
by dan cody on Dec 04, 2007 10:49 AM
why dont u consult a doctor yourself. may be your a gay guy and that's why you are so obsessed with him.
