Discussion Board View article

Total 281 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
ashok leyland
India's ridiculous urban development
by ashok leyland on Nov 09, 2009 05:53 PM

Indian cities are a disgrace.The govt can't see India as only Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata and of late Bangaluru.
Without infrastructure such as sanitation, drinking water, roads and transport, it is nothing but disaster to permit building especially by demolishing beautiful heritage houses and buildings to break the plots into mini-lots and build mini-flats that are nothing but brick & concrete slums of tomorrow.

We spend crores & crores on urban planning depts with armies of government analysts, engineers, architects & planners on monthly salary doing nothing. Partly because of beaurocracy and money illicitly gained in construction so great that nothing is done, except for personal profit, this & political incompetence, speculation,lack of conscience & integrity by government employees and businessmen has succeeded in spawning enormous extensions to existing cities ruining them
The opportunities are many: in any foreign country there are international conferences and events rarely in the capital or large cities, they are decentralised to small towns around the country. So funds enter the coffers of locals and makes organisation less expensive,more effective.
That way the facilities like sports stadiums, conference halls etc; can be built in different areas of the country and progress. In India we know only Delhi exists for Commonwealth, Asian, Olympic games, conferences etc; Utterly stupid and shortsighted management.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ravi Shankar
Who will supply goods and services for 500 cities
by Ravi Shankar on Nov 09, 2009 04:49 PM  | Hide replies

Ok , for arguement sake ,we have created 500 cities ,who is going to make goods and services available to them including water. Are we going to import all of them. Surely we dont want to become another united states.

These dreams are of typical real estate guy, only benefiting him

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Globalcrusador
Re: Who will supply goods and services for 500 cities
by Globalcrusador on Nov 10, 2009 12:42 PM
The way to grow is to create more smaller self contained cities and de-stress the existing metros like Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata etc. Once you create a city, the markets always come to you in search of new client- ele. So that is not a worry.
Secondly, we have an excellent rail network and I doubt if any new city would be too far away from the exist ing rail grid. The solution will lie in creating a feeder line to ths grid. But then other things like power, roads, water, we will have to plan for, in advance. If only we had taken the initiative of creating a national water grid by now by linking up all rivers, such plans would have been easier to implement. It is certainly an idea worth pursuing.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ashok leyland
Re: Who will supply goods and services for 500 cities
by ashok leyland on Nov 09, 2009 06:25 PM
No, it would be better to have 6 enormous concrete slums without water, sanitition and roads like our cities are now.
With people of your thinking we don't need multinationals and foreign infiltration. More anti progressive and pessimistic woul dbe hard to find. Poor chap.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
varnika mishra
Re: Who will supply goods and services for 500 cities
by varnika mishra on Nov 13, 2009 06:33 PM
On which way Bharat is going it is possible. It may take some more years. In many states like these projects on land.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Globalcrusador
Prahlad's suggestions need further study....
by Globalcrusador on Nov 09, 2009 12:43 PM  | Hide replies

Prahlad's remarks need deeper study. It makes sense to spread out the population all over India so that the stress on limited resources of a city like Mumbai, Hyderabad or Bangalore is contained. However, these new cities must be created far away from the existing cities. In Mumbai, they created New Mumbai to distress the original Mumbai, but has the experiment really succeeded ? I wonder what the readers have to say about this ?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ashok leyland
Re: Prahlad's suggestions need further study....
by ashok leyland on Nov 09, 2009 06:26 PM
You are completely right. Pl. read my comments.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Govind Lal
Protection of ecology
by Govind Lal on Nov 09, 2009 08:27 AM

There is an alarming condition of damaging the environment by taking sand and rock for construction purpose. The development plans is to be regulated by enactment protecting the environment. But unfortunately the North Block does not give much attention for this way of approach. What they want is free flow of FDI to speed up re-colonization of India. No matter what project are taken up. Read also the messages in the discussion board under "Chidambaram argues for faster reforms, inclusive growth" rediff 6.10.09?


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sharad
Agreed, but should be market driven
by Sharad on Nov 09, 2009 05:29 AM

The govt should not get involved in building any of these cities by itself. None of our state and central governments have done a good job of CITY PLANNING or CREATING INFRASTRUCTURE in the last 60 years. Therefore, the govt should stay out of execution. It can subtly induce in shaping up the locations (SPREAD THEM EVENLY ACROSS THE COUNTRY and declare plans for ROAD, RAIL, AIRPORT, INDUSTRIAL PLOTS, WASTE MANAGEMENT, WATER MANAGEMENT, SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS etc in these areas and let the private sector DEVELOP and EXECUTE these plans. Go to some western and developed countries, and study how CITY PLANNING is done. In India, it is all haphazard development.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ajit Birdi
500 new cities
by Ajit Birdi on Nov 09, 2009 12:23 AM

500 new cities, thi man is talking from his rear orifice.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Prashant Nanaware
Why city?
by Prashant Nanaware on Nov 09, 2009 12:07 AM  | Hide replies

Why not we are concentrating on villages to...why we are spending too much time to talking about how we can develop world cities where India has more villages and known for that! Its better to provide basic amenities in rural areas and create working environment around them, so migration will stop...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rakesh Kumar
Re: Why city?
by Rakesh Kumar on Nov 09, 2009 09:54 AM
yes we must concentrate on devlpmnt of village so that any city not get densed like slum.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
jackson
Cities?
by jackson on Nov 09, 2009 12:00 AM

500 idlis possible but not 500 cities.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
hiral joshi
Why cities?
by hiral joshi on Nov 08, 2009 11:46 PM

Cant we offer basic amenities and proper living standards in villages? Whats great in cities are they only growth models? Cities are full of pollution and population blasts, chaos of traffic and other corrupt infectious systems. villages are far better if provided all the basic amenities.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jas
Medha Patkar does not want any cities in India...
by Jas on Nov 08, 2009 03:11 PM

She wants only Villages, where no electricity, roads or irrigation should exist. Villagers should live in nature like 1000 years ago.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 281 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message