Discussion Board

Non-penetrative sex okay for 12-yr-olds, says bill


Total 176 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
mangesh mhatre
Who will control KIDS of Leaders?
by mangesh mhatre on Feb 01, 2011 02:59 PM  | Hide replies

If a boy catches a girl & does "non penetrative Sex" with her. Later he threatens her to state to law enforcement that it was with her consent (Which is most probable if the boy is from prominant family like political leader, Gunda family, Village thakur or Panchayat member etc.) Then in that case with this new law, the boy will come out unscathed, but the girl will be ruined for life.
The boy may become BOLDER & try the same thing with other girls of community.

FRANKLY SPEAKING, THIS LAW IS BEING PUT FORWARD TO SAVE UNRULY KIDS LEADERS FROM LAW.
THIS LAW WILL CAUSE HAVOC IN FUTURE AS IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO STOP THESE UNRULY KIDS.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Bodhi Dharma
Re: Who will control KIDS of Leaders?
by Bodhi Dharma on Feb 01, 2011 03:41 PM
Oh shit...let's migrate

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RightSaid Fred
Re: Re: Who will control KIDS of Leaders?
by RightSaid Fred on Feb 01, 2011 03:50 PM
Sorry. Tri-Valley University has been shut down.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sandip Singha
Re: Who will control KIDS of Leaders?
by Sandip Singha on Feb 01, 2011 03:29 PM
please check the other side of the scenerio.. if the Girl belongs to prominant family like political leader, Gunda family, Village thakur or Panchayat member etc. then in that case the boy could be raise his voice for justice with the help of medical test...... and now if Girl's family may harass the boy's and his family if they want.. that could be stopped......

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mangesh mhatre
Re: Re: Who will control KIDS of Leaders?
by mangesh mhatre on Feb 01, 2011 03:46 PM
In that case most probably the boy will live no longer. If at all he does, it will be with some handicap.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ravi bairwa
Re: Who will control KIDS of Leaders?
by ravi bairwa on Feb 01, 2011 03:35 PM
Friend, Read the draft carefully, none of the girl or boy can be older than 16 years and age gap cannot be more than 3 years between them. Leave the issue, it's fine and infact good for building better psychology than desperate rapists.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
r anand
Re: Re: peaceful
by r anand on Feb 01, 2011 03:29 PM
ya that is why Pakistan and KSA had a lot of people searching for don.keys on google and KSA has traumatized camels



   Forward   |   Report abuse
faahadkhan
Re: Re: Re: peaceful
by faahadkhan on Feb 01, 2011 03:42 PM
r anand your m*om defenitely might have derived more anand when she actually begin to procreate you with mule possibly as her mate.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Bodhi Dharma
Re: peaceful
by Bodhi Dharma on Feb 01, 2011 03:40 PM
Oh please, the attempt to start Islam banging, whatever the discussion.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
r anand
Re: Re: peaceful
by r anand on Feb 01, 2011 03:42 PM
why not i am fully secular.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
ravi bairwa
Re: peaceful
by ravi bairwa on Feb 01, 2011 03:36 PM
Friend, Read the draft carefully, none of the girl or boy can be older than 16 years and age gap cannot be more than 3 years between them. Leave the issue, it's fine and infact good for building better psychology than desperate rapists.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
r anand
Re: Re: peaceful
by r anand on Feb 01, 2011 03:42 PM
so you are allowing soft ray.pe to satisfy the mentally sick

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bodhi Dharma
Re: Re: Re: peaceful
by Bodhi Dharma on Feb 01, 2011 03:52 PM
Where are you from man? Didn't you know people in school who were having their share of fun?? Was anyone of them raping or getting raped? Rape is a completely different thing don't confuse it for consensual sex.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
abhisek jain
This is totally unacceptable
by abhisek jain on Feb 01, 2011 01:33 PM  | Hide replies

I believe penetrative or non-penetrative sex , consensual or non-consensual both are non-acceptable for children of the age group of 12-16 as it diverts their mind to what they should not seek or practice.

Just it should be observed that both the partners of such horrendous offense must be punished equally be it boy or girl or else our future generation would go into a deep slump and be back to Stone Age Culture...........

    Forward  |  Report abuse
bewakoof
Re: This is totally unacceptable
by bewakoof on Feb 01, 2011 01:48 PM
What is Unacceptable?

The Govt is not saying that as soon as a child turns twelve, it would be forced to indulge in such activities.

The Govt is saying that if the child does, to a certain extent, then lets not put them in jail and leave it up to the Parents / Guardians to tackle the issues.

If your 13 year old child gets involved in such activity, what will you do - go to the Police or handle it yourself?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mukesh kumar
Re: Re: This is totally unacceptable
by mukesh kumar on Feb 01, 2011 03:06 PM
So you are telling, if a boy below 12 yrs does this he should be sent to jail.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bodhi Dharma
Re: This is totally unacceptable
by Bodhi Dharma on Feb 01, 2011 03:37 PM
Rubbish.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
AK
Re: This is totally unacceptable
by AK on Feb 01, 2011 01:45 PM
The country will go down the drain only because of brainless people like you. Do you understand the consequences of a child going to jail for simply playing with another consenting kid in an exploratory sense and a stupid parent drags one of the kids to court..? Do you think any child will desist from doing this or do this by being “aware” of the law..?? Take the mud out of your head and fill with some gyan.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ravi bairwa
Re: Re: This is totally unacceptable
by ravi bairwa on Feb 01, 2011 03:37 PM
Friend, Read the draft carefully, none of the girl or boy can be older than 16 years and age gap cannot be more than 3 years between them. Leave the issue, it's fine and infact good for building better psychology than desperate rapists.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dharmendra jadoun
decriminalise ???
by dharmendra jadoun on Feb 01, 2011 01:25 PM  | Hide replies

It is legalizing not decriminalise ...

for decriminalise the law should - on first few attempt they should be warned by parents to avoid that activity otherwise they can be punished , I mean the rules should not be harsh but SHOULD BE THERE ...

otherwise it is not decriminaliseing it is legalizing and encouraging .

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
ravi bairwa
Re: decriminalise ???
by ravi bairwa on Feb 01, 2011 03:37 PM
Friend, Read the draft carefully, none of the girl or boy can be older than 16 years and age gap cannot be more than 3 years between them. Leave the issue, it's fine and infact good for building better psychology than desperate rapists.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Shax
Poor Pen*s
by Shax on Feb 01, 2011 01:18 PM

Poor Pen*s lost its importance in this legal statement.....grow up man

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sunil Dupakuntla
Rediculous Bill
by Sunil Dupakuntla on Feb 01, 2011 01:16 PM

What is the need of the hour to bring such legislation now? What is the logic that govt has to give this time? Is sonia trying to impose western culture by making it legal? Last time gay bill was introduced which was again rediculous one. It was against nature.

Why the person who drafted the bill have reservations for the people below 12 years if involved in non-penetrative sex? Congress govt instead of concentrating on development and punishing scamsters they are more interested in westranising the country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
First Hindu
4 Ashram....
by First Hindu on Feb 01, 2011 01:16 PM  | Hide replies

0-8 Childhood

8-21 Brahmacharya - Aim is to gain as much knowledge, practice celibacy, self discipline, learning to live by DHARMA (right action)

21-49 Grihsthashram - Aim is to selflessly serve family, society, gainful labour

50 - 74 Vanaprasthashram - Gradually withdraws from the worl, shares wisdom

75 -100 Sanyasashram - Completely withdraws from the world, spiritual pursuits to attain MOKSHA.

Now with so much philosophy and knowledge this country has ...our parliamentarians still feel the need to pass a law base on crooked ways of life followed in western countries....!

WHAT A SHAME...!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
srterhdfhsdfgsf erretgfgd
rubbish
by srterhdfhsdfgsf erretgfgd on Feb 01, 2011 01:15 PM

so sad this nation is sure to fall.....the way these days the youngsters are..india deserves to serve cultured and intelligent chinese
after all this is kalyug..........everything will change....so be happy that everything is happening as it should have happened in kalyug..........god is there

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 176 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message