He completed MSc at the age of 12 and got doctorate degree at 21. Normal ppl take 4-5( 1) years to complete PhD. In his case he took 9 yrs and wrote thesis of just 33 pgs. 9yr= 33 pg. bad equation.
Re: MSc at 12 and PhD at 21, phew !!! too long
by deshbhakt on Aug 31, 2009 02:17 PM
know the full expansion of PhD? Oh...let me make it simple for you. How many alphabets are there in English?
Re: Re: MSc at 12 and PhD at 21, phew !!! too long
by mailtobee on Aug 31, 2009 02:22 PM
for your kind information i am doing PhD in Wisconsin University. I was in IISc and i know him.
Re: Re: Re: MSc at 12 and PhD at 21, phew !!! too long
by chicken flu on Sep 05, 2009 10:01 AM
wisconsin uni is a s hit h ole university and it doesn't come in any ranking!sorry!
Re: Re: Re: MSc at 12 and PhD at 21, phew !!! too long
by Murli Devi on Aug 31, 2009 03:11 PM
Then you must be knowing this too that in IISc a normal PhD takes at least 6-7 years!!!
Re: MSc at 12 and PhD at 21, phew !!! too long
by mahesh on Sep 01, 2009 08:04 PM
had u known him u shoul hv noted that his Phd took 6 years. i also doubt that u r doing phd because u don't know that quality of a work matters not the number of pages.
Re: MSc at 12 and PhD at 21, phew !!! too long
by Hari on Aug 31, 2009 03:21 PM
Max Planks PHD thesis on quantum theory was just 30 or so pages long, so was Schrodingers thesis on Quantum wave function. Both took years to complete. Fermats theorem proof was some 300 pages long but his original assumed proof would have fit in a single page if Fermat was correct.
Jealous are queing up here to show that he is nothing.Writing comments here is great achievement then getting fellowship. You Indian never understand true value of brotherhood.Shut up all id*iot*s
I am appalled at the comments from my fellow citizens. Achieving PhD from IISc at 21 is no mean achievement. I recently read that IISc is the topmost Technology & Science Institute in the country.
Rather than spreading negativism and comments on how exam are passed in Bihar I request you all to write good and praise the whiz kid.
Re: Re: 21 years to comlplete a PHD
by paloalto on Aug 31, 2009 02:00 PM
atleast i am not talking like this!
Re: Re: underplayed by deshbhakt on Aug 31, 2009 01:58 PM again here too i do not want to comment on your shallow remarks. obviously you are not a candidate for science, and if you happen to be in the scientific field, i pity your peers
Re: 21 years to comlplete a PHD
by deshbhakt on Aug 31, 2009 02:10 PM
madam .... getting a PhD from IISc is not a Miss Universe or a Ms India beauty contest
One needs to put in hard work, show academic, intellectual achievement and exhibit original thinking
Re: Re: 21 years to comlplete a PHD
by amit bali on Sep 01, 2009 01:58 PM
I am pretty sure i could get it I think under you its possible....since you are open to casting couch...oh wait minute...you still not a doctor. Lemme know once you are.
Very few peoaple in India know about quantom physics. Its a very advanced subject and weird too. Hence, if you write 20-30 pages on a subject no body knows what exactly it is then you are sure to get Doctorate.
Re: quantom physics
by paloalto on Aug 31, 2009 01:53 PM
very true, one nuclear scientist dr. kakodkar and one rocket scientist dr. kalam and one quantum mechanic dr. tulsi!
dr. tulsis miraculous feat should be underplayed, simply because it is certainly not advisable for youngsters to follow it! i wish dr. tulsi to come up something spectacular and revolutionizing instead of sounding cliched of writing some code or s/wares for computing. I am expecting a miracle of sorts again from this prodigy ? fluke; your game starts NOW.
Re: underplayed
by paloalto on Aug 31, 2009 01:45 PM
as it is parents push their kids to the point of mental harakiri! our kids need fresh air, huge grounds, sports complex, lots of pure and clear water, greenery and need to be in touch with nature. we don't need xboxes, computers, television and cinema for them!
Re: Re: underplayed
by deshbhakt on Aug 31, 2009 01:58 PM
again here too i do not want to comment on your shallow remarks. obviously you are not a candidate for science, and if you happen to be in the scientific field, i pity your peers
