because of Nitishkumar, Mr. Manmohasinghji and Mrs. Soniyaji are feeling very happy for Mr. Ramvilash Paswan & Mr. Lalu Prashad Yadav. No elected M.P., They will not ask for any press.,
I congratulate MMS and Sonia Gandhi for acheiving this landmark victory in general elections,as promised during elction rallies they must now have a strong team of ministers and advisors to run the government as well as implement the welfare schemes. Opposition has got very little role to play at this moment they are yet to come out of the shock of defeat and that would take a few months, as every party is preparing to hold post election meetings and brain storming sessions to find out the reason of defeat. I think they do not need to have all this drama, thefact is simple and that is none of them had any policy for the benefit of common man. Take for example the BJP they were asking for votes from common man saying their candidate is iron man, they wanted to hang afzal guru, and find out waysfor ram temple, others were busy only in saying who will be next PM and there were half a dozen names in the list, so the question is that what did they had for common mans education, health care and progress. none. MMS is a learned person and hopefully will boost India's image and economy to new heights this time.
Re: Re: Re: History of India
by antony semion on May 18, 2009 07:05 PM
Check your certificate once. Because now you are in unconscious mind because of 16th hangover.
Re: History of India
by krishna pritish on May 18, 2009 07:13 PM
we hindus were ruled for 2000 years by invaders and british.we have remained slave for so many years that we have lost our self respect.no matter what we say european and american still consider us as slave.what congress has done to improve our image.congress has given half of the kashmir to pakistan and china.bank accounts of quotrocci has been defreezed and interpol arrest warrant has also been withdrawn by the indian government on the orders os "saint sonia".media is also biased against BJP.rajiv gadhi killed 4000 sikhs and immediately he was made prime minister.he killed hundreds of soldiers by sending them to srilanka as part of indian peace keeping force and we were humiliated the srilankan government.some people are asking about the qualification of BJP leaders,will some one tell me the qualification of sonia gandhi,rahul gandhi and priyanka gandhi.what congress did to change the system.20 years ago a committee on police reforms had suggested that police should be made independent and should be removed from political control but congress rejected that report.how many roads congress has built,how many schools congress has opened,how many villages congress has electrified in 55 years of it's rule.congress never tried to change the system.look at the condition of our judicial system,our public distribution system,public health system.before NDA 8 lane highways was considered as dream but NDA realised that dream.is talking about bangladeshi infiltrators communalism.
Re: History of India
by Republican on May 18, 2009 06:54 PM
For each of these empires.. Understanding the vast variety of Indian society has been a key to success n survival.. Be it Ashoka who let all the religions to breath freely inspite of being a Buddhist himself, or be it Akbar who joined hands with hindus or be it british woh used devide-n-rule. understanding the variety is the key. BJP/RSS has never been able to do so in their 100years agenda of Hindutva.. even a common hindu doesnt buy it in his own daily life or on a voting machine. Gandhi understood it long back n so did Nehru n his descendants.. There isnt a reason to cry abt Ghandhi regime unless u have any better alternative. Interestingly Rahul Gandhi has already proved himself to be much better candidate than the BJP's failed leader LKA. I wish him a peaceful sanyas and happy that he is not ruling the nation.
Re: History of India
by antony semion on May 18, 2009 07:02 PM
GANDHI EMPIRE :1947 - Never end If need remove all brainwashed childish characters. Think what India need. Don`t try to fool Hindus. Then the result of BJP will be more worst than now. They are wise enough. Religion cast community card wont work in India. Well done India.
Re: Re: History of India
by antony semion on May 18, 2009 07:09 PM
Atleast respect Mahatma gandhi. You are more than a Pakistani terrorist. A biggest shame of India
Re: Re: History of India
by Republican on May 18, 2009 06:59 PM
u shud be happy n proud that our ruling-leaders have implemented the 'unity in diversity' of this nation in their own family. Unless ofcourse u r a fundamentalist, separatist, casteist, communal fascist that RSS keeps manufacturing.
Mr Baru, you are a perceptive person and this article shows it. However, my view is that the average voter does not indulge in semantics and just votes for whatever takes his fancy. This time the congress took his or her fancy and he or she voted accordingly. Also let us understand that this election has had more complexity in that there were 'competing seculars' and the voter felt that the coongress was the best of the lot. The nuclear deal has exercised the imagination of only the chatterati and is not a subject that interests people in rural and semi urban areas. In my humble opinion, the coongrss needs to accept the verdict with humility and get back to the service consciousness that it started out with, or it will be thrown out in the next election, if there is one! Too much to expect in the present day and age!
I personally think, what we need is not a 'right' or 'left' rule, but a centrist one. We saw how absolute capitalist rule can wreck the economic system because it tends to be not transparent in its dealings as we saw with all the fallen U.S banks.Our own public sector banks not only survived the disaster that devoured the US and other western economy, but flourished too.
Re: A centrist rule?
by Rajesh zha on May 18, 2009 06:38 PM
Our banks survived not because of govt but becoz of comman man who is keen on saving his earnigns. Unlike in US and western countries, Indians don't want to buy what they don't afford. People consider loans as liabilities and repay them to banks. All the people repay credit card charges without paying interst over it. So banks hold sufficient money with them.
Re: Re: A centrist rule?
by sumanta chatterjee on May 18, 2009 06:47 PM
I wish you become the Governor of Reserve bank. From which university did you do your Phd in economics?
Re: Congress and its allies again...
by troll on May 18, 2009 06:26 PM
Mr Advani should take out a Somnath to Geneva Yatra and bring the Swiss Bank money back. After all, he has massive mandate of people when his party carried out the stunt of mini-referendum in Gujarat, before the election.
Re: No way
by cm dhingra on May 18, 2009 06:51 PM
Now whom your party has proposed to be PM-in-Waiting for 2014. Propose it early because there are many climents in your party as well as in Third, Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Fronts. Day dreaming is permitted in present day politics but reality will be decided by Voters.
Re: No way
by AvInAsH K on May 18, 2009 06:18 PM
Yes wait for 2014.. that time congress will not need NCP, DMK also.. It will get more than 272 seates :)
Re: Re: No way
by antony semion on May 18, 2009 06:46 PM
Yes 2014 is the year of youth like Rahul, Priyanka. All extremists will sit in home. BJP along with his leader will retire from India he was trying to avoid that but god never allow he is going to become again opposition leader
Re: Re: No way
by antony semion on May 18, 2009 06:46 PM
Yes 2014 is the year of youth like Rahul, Priyanka. All extremists will sit in home. BJP along with his leader will retire from India he was trying to avoid that but god never allow he is going to become again opposition leader
Re: No way
by kaymos on May 18, 2009 06:29 PM
"One swallow doesn't make summer ".Surely two does. Wishes are wild horses. Its high time Mr.Advani retires gracefully and undo the damage done by him in his quest to capture the "hot seat" .
The so called specialists like Pronnoy Roy, Arnav Goswami & many others who made all kinds of predictions & post poll scenarios 1, 2, 3 and so on should be taught some tough lessons by the viewers (how I don't know !!). They were wrong & did so much damage to our people. At least they all must accept that they were wrong & apologize for what they told viewers till May 16 AM. Its disgusting that these jokers could go on talking all rubbish & claim success in their forecasts etc. The Regulator, if any in the media must ensure that adequate panalties are imposed so that they do their home work well & not talk crap & waste viewers time.
Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by Sanjay Makwana on May 18, 2009 06:11 PM
Now I understand why Hindo-istan was ruled, looted, converted, destroyed by Mughals for 600 years and by Britishers for 400 years
Re: Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by Argumentative Indian on May 18, 2009 06:26 PM
The Mughals ruled India from around 1200 to 1600 AD, thats roughly 400 hundred years.
The Mughals are now found, primarily in Indian history text books and the occassional Bollywood movie, remember Mughal - E - Azam and more recently Jodha - Akbar.
The British arrived in India in 1607 / 08, ruled from around mid 1700 (after the battle of Plassey 1775) to 1947, less than 200 years.
The Brits today are more popular globally for the sad demise of Jane Goody, the hairstyle of David Beckham and the choice of underwear of Scary Spice.
India, owns 51% of the Global Business Process Outsourcing Market, Produces the world's highest number of software engineers and actually has a Banking System that has not collapsed.
ABOVE ALL, India neither hatest the Mughals nor the Brits, we love the Taj Mahal, Red Fort, Great Trunk Road, The Chhatrapati Shivaji Railway Terminus, the Rail System of India, the Parliamentary Democracy and Yes, we do have empathy and love for Jade Goody.
Re: Re: Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by Sanjay Makwana on May 18, 2009 06:29 PM
I think then the lives given by Sahid Bhagat SIngh, Rajguru, and many freedom fighters are in vein because the new generations wanted the mughals and british
Re: Re: Re: Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by sumanta chatterjee on May 18, 2009 06:37 PM
It is better to vote for a party who had kicked out the British and are still called sceudo nationalist rather than one whose predecessors had actually tried to dislodge the Indian freedom struggle and whose present generation leaders find Jinnah to be a true secular person.
Re: Re: Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by kaymos on May 18, 2009 07:03 PM
On the contrary , they deserve royalties for constructing those magnificent buildings which now India is now associated with,
Re: Re: Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by ankush jindal on May 18, 2009 07:13 PM
"ABOVE ALL, India neither hatest the Mughals nor the Brits, we love the Taj Mahal, Red Fort, Great Trunk Road, The Chhatrapati Shivaji Railway Terminus, the Rail System of India, the Parliamentary Democracy and Yes, we do have empathy and love for Jade Goody" A very naive, superficial and trivializing argument put forward by the "argumentative Indian". Do you suggest that these landmarks, the rail network, the parliamentary democracy etc are reason enough for us to believe that foreign rule was good for us? How can these ever compensate for the blatant exploitation of our resources and people (esp. by the British)? And how dare you suggest that Indians who established first modern civilization, when Europeans were probably still living in caves, could not have erected these landmarks or evolved into a democracy in the absence of the foreigners?
Re: Re: Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by kaymos on May 18, 2009 06:42 PM
We ought to pay rents to their progeny for attracting the tourists and thereby helping our economy.
Re: Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by Umashanker Kapoor on May 18, 2009 06:18 PM
because bbjjpp was not there at that time, especially angry bold man and the looo purush.
Re: Re: Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by Sanjay Makwana on May 18, 2009 06:23 PM
Dont worry if the persons cant learn lessons from their past, in their future also they will face the same
Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by manjunath iyer on May 18, 2009 06:28 PM
Sure....media must be penalised...The HYPE they create is more than a month long election...Useless talks and thoughts... I always feel them as a laughing stock whenever i see them on any talking platform... U r right...Media to be put to a place...and not to go above that..
Re: Time for action against TV channels !!
by Umashanker Kapoor on May 18, 2009 06:16 PM
ask mooodyji mah. he has all the answers. he had answers to the 30 questions posed by paki in the ajaml kasab case.
