Yeah, very true... Venkaih Naidu is still is his teens, Sushma Swaraj, is a gigling school going girl..lolzz.. What to say about Mr.Advani, he just won Mr.Gladraggs.. A party consisting of the geriatric population of the country is accusing a known young party...
Mr. why dont you participate in "Laughter Challenge", I am sure that you would be having many such jokes to share with us..
Re: Buddha sathiya gaya kya?? ;)
by Against Pseudos on Mar 30, 2009 08:48 AM
Waris:
I suggest you read the interview above instead of providing us with "laughter challenge" material...
Rediff is enough of a comedy to Title their articles / interviews with meaningless things, and you add more laughter by not even reading the articles you are supposed to be commenting on...
Perfect example of a victim of Headline politicking... :)
Re: Re: Buddha sathiya gaya kya?? ;)
by waris khan on Mar 30, 2009 08:59 AM
Pseudo... Nice name and just the same work.. Before deciding,who is the victim,go through the article again.. I am sure, you will enjoy it and have a good laugh. ;)
By the way, Atal ji, was left..He must be in creche. and Modi, poor chap, no school for him!!
Re: Re: Re: Buddha sathiya gaya kya?? ;)
by Against Pseudos on Mar 30, 2009 10:01 AM
Waris:
I did go through the article as opposed to commenting on the headline...
Lemme refresh your memory by quoting from the interview:
"Your prime ministerial candidate is 81 years old, while the Congress is projecting its young leadership alongside Manmohan Singh [Images]. Is this not a major disadvantage for the BJP?
I do not want to name anyone, but Advani [Images]ji is surely the healthiest of the leaders in India today. He has already toured the entire country on his Vijay Sankalp rallies. He is energetic and experienced. Bharat ko chalana koi bacchon ka khel nahin hai (governing a country like India is no child's play). The leader has to tackle multi-dimensional problems, be it border disputes, water disputes with neighbours and within the country, economic matters, regional and ethnic tensions, terrorism, etc.
Then, if young people should rule India, why does the Congress not have the guts to project a young prime minister? The problem is that for Congress, youth only means dynasty. This is going to be a major election issue in our campaign."
If you notice (which you haven't till now); the actual statement is "Then, if young people should rule India, why does the Congress not have the guts to project a young prime minister? The problem is that for Congress, youth only means dynasty."
This obviously is a sarcastic retort to Kaangress who claims it has youth... MMS is not a youth... which is what Naidu stressed on.
it is really shameful for world largest democracy that first representative of the Nation is not directly elected by the nation .
and unable to face the Public of India . it is very surprise that we can not elect our own National Representative(PM) , if he his not competent we have to make our representative worldwide .
this type of Paralyzed Prime minister can called Poor Minister . who he can represent this historical Democracy .
Re: first representative of Nation (PM) not elected by the Nation
by Alwyn george on Mar 30, 2009 08:58 AM
but he is the most educated among all the contenders.. wat say :)
Re: Re: first representative of Nation (PM) not elected by the Na
by Against Pseudos on Mar 30, 2009 09:02 AM
That's why it's doubly hurting... That he thinks (or his party thinks) that he is not capable of garnering votes despite his learnedness. Or is it BECAUSE of his learnedness?... ;)
Re: Re: first representative of Nation (PM) not elected by the Na
by D END on Mar 30, 2009 09:17 AM
your name explain your bias. We forgive you for your below average intelligence level. There is always next time sweetie
Re: Re: Re: first representative of Nation (PM) not elected by th
by waris khan on Mar 30, 2009 09:38 AM
Mr. Pseudo, have a comment for every one, what ever one writes although,he doesn't consider himself capable enough to give a view or write a complete message. So what he does is that he just waits for someone else to write something and then comment on it.
Yeah, very true... Venkaih Naidu is still is his teens, Sushma Swaraj, is a gigling school going girl..lolzz.. What to say about Mr.Advani, he just won Mr.Gladraggs.. A party consisting of the geriatric population of the country is accusing a known young party...
Mr. why dont you participate in "Laughter Challenge", I am sure that you would be having many such jokes to share with us..
Re: Biggest Joke of the year!!!..Buddha sathiya gaya kya?? ;)
by ByTheWay way on Mar 30, 2009 08:44 AM
fool, try to understand the context in which he made those comments. If you cant make out what it was, then its the problem of your education. Bydway which is the known 'young party' you mentioned ?
Re: Re: Biggest Joke of the year!!!..Buddha sathiya gaya kya?? ;)
by Against Pseudos on Mar 30, 2009 08:46 AM
Young party he refers to is the party of MMS and Soniya Ji.... both Primary school students... :)
Re: Biggest Joke of the year!!!..Buddha sathiya gaya kya?? ;)
by Against Pseudos on Mar 30, 2009 08:45 AM
Waris:
I suggest you read the interview above instead of providing us with "laughter challenge" material...
Rediff is enough of a comedy to Title their articles / interviews with meaningless things, and you add more laughter by not even reading the articles you are supposed to be commenting on...
Perfect example of a victim of Headline politicking... :)
Re: Re: Biggest Joke of the year!!!..Buddha sathiya gaya kya?? ;)
by waris khan on Mar 30, 2009 08:55 AM
hey.."by the way".. your English is as poor as your attitude..go to some good college man..
Re: Re: Re: Biggest Joke of the year!!!..Buddha sathiya gaya kya?
by santosh pendkar on Mar 30, 2009 09:37 AM
May be his English is poor , But I can say that your thinking & reading ability itself is so poor that you are not reading article properly...
Re: Re: Biggest Joke of the year!!!..Buddha sathiya gaya kya?? ;)
by Alwyn george on Mar 30, 2009 09:00 AM
I do not understand why people are fighting over politicians, we have many other things to fight for guys...
1. Ganhi was killed just before the meeting to be held at 1730h on on 30 Jan 1948 of senior congressmen , the meeting which was convened by Gandhi to convert the congress to LOK SEWA DAL.
2. Few people in Congress did not want the gandhi to Convert Congress to SEWA DAL because of their political future.
3. Nathuram Godse was just a hit man. Who said in his trial that I did not fire though I had gone their with the intension of killing gandhi.
4. Nathu Ram Godse was denied his last wish to meet his old parents in PUNE who could not travel to Ambala on the Groundz that it will affect the law and Order.
Re: CONGRESS GOT M K GANDHI KILLED
by ByTheWay way on Mar 30, 2009 08:46 AM
the whole mess we are in with regard to our neighbourhood can be attributed to our father of the nation. and another big mistake he did - he dint dismantle conagress party after '47.
Re: CONGRESS GOT M K GANDHI KILLED
by Prashant Mardolkar on Mar 30, 2009 09:40 AM
yes dear singh, Bapu commited suicide.Nathu was just present there to supply him gun
Re: CONGRESS GOT M K GANDHI KILLED
by waris khan on Mar 30, 2009 08:31 AM
Your 5th Point.."Shame..Shame"..what was that??.. I guess, you wanted to write something and then shame...shame..u got carried away bro..
Re: Re: CONGRESS GOT M K GANDHI KILLED
by Against Pseudos on Mar 30, 2009 08:49 AM
Since you reached the 5th point, and had nothing else to contribute, I take it that you agree with the remaining 4?
Re: Re: Re: CONGRESS GOT M K GANDHI KILLED
by waris khan on Mar 30, 2009 09:33 AM
Again, you are jumping to wrong conclusions man with all the excitement and giving out results.. :) If you cant understand humor then man, its yr prob not mine.. My sympathies are with you. :)
1. Mrriage of conveniences is the main theme of chamcha corps caleed congress. When rajiv came the youth. He got entangled in financial scandal of the tune of 100s of crores. SIKH genocide of 1984 scale holding back the Army from stopping the genocide.
2. Then came the Buddha Corps of Congress in the name of Budhas, narasimha rao, Sita Ram Kesari who murdered a doctor and had affair with his wife. Man Mohan with no heart and two by-pass surgeries.
3. And now the turn to install rahul so Young Cacophony. It is the congress who has gaged the youth in this country. is there no other young man in Congress other than Rahul to lead the nation. shame on chamchas for being slaves.
The youth in national politics is that of Ideas and not of stupid people like the YUVRAJ. Congress is old with old Ideas needs to be dumped in Arabian Ocean. BJP is young with youthful Ideas. So GUYS and GALS vote for BJP, VOTE for prosperous future.
Re: OLD AND YOUNG - THE TRUTH
by jay menon on Mar 30, 2009 08:38 AM
ha ha ha .....good tht u r still in 1965's Mr. Singh.....one YOUNG leader has come up n Indian politics....L K Advani ;)
Re: Re: Re: OLD AND YOUNG - THE TRUTH
by Goutam Nayak on Mar 30, 2009 09:31 AM
Actually Sonia need not need any Chamcha, her politics is a quality politics, not like Advani & co. All mean type of politics. Last five year, as opposition leader, just have done 'WALK OUT". One a single day raise an issue to keep up the common people's favour, now not getting any issue, just behaving like mad.
The horror that is unfolding in Sri Lanka becomes possible because of the silence that surrounds it. There is almost no reporting in the mainstream Indian media — or indeed in the international press — about what is happening there. Why this should be so is a matter of serious concern.
From the little information that is filtering through it looks as though the Sri Lankan government is using the propaganda of the ‘war on terror’ as a fig leaf to dismantle any semblance of democracy in the country, and commit unspeakable crimes against the Tamil people. Working on the principle that every Tamil is a terrorist unless he or she can prove otherwise, civilian areas, hospitals and shelters are being bombed and turned into a war zone. Reliable estimates put the number of civilians trapped at over 200,000. The Sri Lankan Army is advancing, armed with tanks and aircraft.
Meanwhile, there are official reports that several ‘‘welfare villages’’ have been established to house displaced Tamils in Vavuniya and Mannar districts. According to a report in The Daily Telegraph (Feb 14, 2009), these villages ‘‘will be compulsory holding centres for all civilians fleeing the fighting’’. Is this a euphemism for concentration camps?
Re: CONGRESS WILL LOSE THIS ELECTION
by chennai predator on Mar 30, 2009 07:03 AM
The former foreign minister of Sri Lanka, Mangala Samaraveera, told The Daily Telegraph: ‘‘A few months ago the government started registering all Tamils in Colombo on the grounds that they could be a security threat, but this could be exploited for other purposes like the Nazis in the 1930s. They’re basically going to label the whole civilian Tamil population as potential terrorists.’’
Given its stated objective of ‘‘wiping out’’ the LTTE, this malevolent collapse of civilians and ‘‘terrorists’’ does seem to signal that the government of Sri Lanka is on the verge of committing what could end up being genocide. According to a UN estimate several thousand people have already been killed. Thousands more are critically wounded. The few eyewitness reports that have come out are descriptions of a nightmare from hell. What we are witnessing, or should we say, what is happening in Sri Lanka and is being so effectively hidden from public scrutiny, is a brazen, openly racist war. The impunity with which the Sri Lankan government is being able to commit these crimes actually unveils the deeply ingrained racist prejudice, which is precisely what led to the marginalization and alienation of the Tamils of Sri Lanka in the first place. That racism has a long history, of social ostracisation, economic blockades, pogroms and torture. The brutal nature of the decades-long civil war, which started as a peaceful, non-violent protest, has its roots in this.
Re: Re: CONGRESS WILL LOSE THIS ELECTION
by chennai predator on Mar 30, 2009 07:03 AM
Why the silence? In another interview Mangala Samaraveera says, ‘‘A free media is virtually non-existent in Sri Lanka today.’’
Samaraveera goes on to talk about death squads and ‘white van abductions’, which have made society ‘‘freeze with fear’’. Voices of dissent, including those of several journalists, have been abducted and assassinated. The International Federation of Journalists accuses the government of Sri Lanka of using a combination of anti-terrorism laws, disappearances and assassinations to silence journalists.
There are disturbing but unconfirmed reports that the Indian government is lending material and logistical support to the Sri Lankan government in these crimes against humanity. If this is true, it is outrageous. What of the governments of other countries? Pakistan? China? What are they doing to help, or harm the situation?
In Tamil Nadu the war in Sri Lanka has fuelled passions that have led to more than 10 people immolating themselves. The public anger and anguish, much of it genuine, some of it obviously cynical political manipulation, has become an election issue.
Re: Re: Re: CONGRESS WILL LOSE THIS ELECTION
by chennai predator on Mar 30, 2009 07:04 AM
It is extraordinary that this concern has not travelled to the rest of India. Why is there silence here? There are no ‘white van abductions’ — at least not on this issue. Given the scale of what is happening in Sri Lanka, the silence is inexcusable. More so because of the Indian government’s long history of irresponsible dabbling in the conflict, first taking one side and then the other. Several of us including myself, who should have spoken out much earlier, have not done so, simply because of a lack of information about the war. So while the killing continues, while tens of thousands of people are being barricaded into concentration camps, while more than 200,000 face starvation, and a genocide waits to happen, there is dead silence from this great country. It’s a colossal humanitarian tragedy. The world must step in. Now. Before it’s too late.
