UPA A visionary and statesman like MMS No serious corruption charges in these 5 years! There is some political will The nuc deal was done. New beginning. NREG and attempts to make things more transparent by RTI etc Nearly 9% growth for 5 continuos years
Re: upa
by ASD on Mar 18, 2009 11:28 AM
sir, only the PM cannot run the country. it takes a strong cabinet with patriotic persons to take the country to progress. though i agree with MMS being a fair person, the party, viz a viz the cabinet he works with is only concerned about saving their seat by m!nority (especially mus) appeasement from the last 55 yrs.
Mayawati has joined the Third front only to further her ambitions of becoming the Prime Minister, alliance with UPA or NDA will allow that liberty. Then we have Jayalalita- who will not let go her chances, there are still more with Prime Minister ambitions and hence have joined the third front. They are least bothered about the state of the nation in terms of economic upliftment or security of the country( which they want only for themselves-- Just like swiss banks hide the ill gotten wealth, our politicians want to hide their illegal deals. )
There is more to it in the launch of third front. The timing of the same is very much indicative of oppurtunism. It is very well known that the party is a failure, bereft of truth and legitmacy and a product of evil objectives. The above proposition will well be accepted in their heart by the founders of the same. There is more to it than meets the eye. This becomes more obvious when one looks into reactions to the same. By co-incidence the ruling party whose downright refusal to the acceptance of this dubious force seem to make it share dias with the evil and opportunistic BJP. Infact one does not know why BJP who lack legitimacy and stand for oppurtunism should object to the formation of this front?.
Thus the launch of the front seems to be a cunning ploy of communal forces to make it seem to the voter that the evil and illegitimate BJP shares the virtue and truth. The ruling party would be at the best of its common sense to avoid any naivete decisions that would result in its inadvertently becoming partner to evil BJP and help promote its duplicitous agenda. One good rejoinder would be to recall former PM Lal bahadur sastri’s observation on the evil RSS chief rjju bhayya that ” if he shook hands with him(rajju) then congressmen would think he quit congress, leftists would think he joined the “right” “. So deliberate and cunning are these liars that if given a chance they will prove that sun rises in the west.
Democracy means Majority should rule, whearas in Coalition Era, the Smallest party having no national recognition dictate terms of our national & foriegn Policy. a constitutional amendment is required to stop this nonsense. But, Who will bell the cat?
Re: Re: Coalions are anti Democracy
by donkeybreadth on Mar 18, 2009 11:24 AM
Yes, the communist monkeys want to reverse the nuclear sale. That way China has a leg up on India, have you no shame, you dickless little leftwing desi tosser
Re: Re: Coalions are anti Democracy
by Pradyumna Sridhar on Mar 18, 2009 11:23 AM
Can You define Secularism, by the way?
When Mayawwati opens her mouth she talks only about caste, religion... Secularism is about respecting and treating everyone equaally and you are dreaming about secularism in mayawatis's govt! huh!
