========================================== Sachin has right to decide when to retire: Time magazine ========================================== Everyone knows he is the teacher of most of the young cricketers. but he himself says "Still he is a learner". Also he have the learning sprit like new commer. ============================================ I HOPE WE DON'T HAVE THE RIGHTS TO SAY ANY COMMENTS AGAINST HIM. ============================================
Sachin has been playing for his own records. He has nothing to do irrespective of India's win or loss. This has been well relected in the past matches.
Re: Sachin has right to decide when to retire: Time magazine
by Harshwardhan Siddhanti on Mar 19, 2012 11:55 AM
then why he holds the record for having maximum 100 on for winning side, and why he has scorred 200 against fearfull proteas attaack
Lesser mortals and Arm Chair Critics do not have the right to decide when Sachin should retire. The man is sensible enought to know when to hang up his boots. let us leave him in peace.
if sachin should not retire because he is in good form what about rahul dravid he was highest run scorer in last year board ask him to retire and even tendulkar making a comment before dravid announceing his retirement this shows his selfishness and attitude of the player. look his centureis whether any matches has been won once senior played commented if tendulkar score centry india never won.
Think before Ink. So many people had fought for our freedom then why we are all hailing Gandhi as Mahatma and giving him more credit than anybody else. It is like that sachin for cricket. If you do not respect a player like sachin then whom you are going to respect. Let me ask all sachin bashers that if sachin had scored his 100th 100 against weak bangla then why did not the team defend 290 against them? India won the match against lanka by 50 runs defending 304 but did not defend 290 against so called weak bangla. But you people would blame it on sachin. Let me tell you tomorrow if bangla beat lanka, then it would be the second consecutive tournament when virat scored india did not enter finals. When sachin scores india loses is your theory then when virat scores india do not enter final will be our theory. But by any logic our theory will be as foolish as yours. Many players would come and go because of whom we can win and lose which is part of the game. But a career like sachin's will come once in a while. Try to preserve it even if you do not like it.
"Times Writers" has "Picked" "Vivian Richards" Statements which he gave very "Emotionally". From past 1 year "Richards" & "Sachin" are "Praising" each other & finally "Richards" was called for "TV Shows" in "India"!!! Nobody is bigger than "Nation" or "Team Sport". "Emotionally" given "Statements" should be seen in that "Context" only!!! "God" knows how "India" is listening to these "Statements" where "Spirit" of "Team Sport" is "Compromised"!!!
Re: Sachin : only 53/100 resulted in victories???shameless.......
by B M on Mar 19, 2012 11:16 AM
It shows the rest of the team in poor light. Its a shame that the remaining 10 players failed to perform their part and take the team home when one player has already scored a 100.
Re: Sachin : only 53/100 resulted in victories???shameless.......
by shripad ghodke on Mar 19, 2012 11:19 AM
A guy who written this about Sachin........knows how to play cricket?Why r u write this foolish comments?R u playing better than Sachin then go and write..hopeless guy
Re: Sachin : only 53/100 resulted in victories???shameless.......
by Rajeshkumar on Mar 19, 2012 11:21 AM
what about matched drawn or saved? please get your stats correct
ODI total sachin century 48 100% India win 33 68.76 % India lost 13 27.08 % tie 1 2.08 % n/r 1 2.08 %
test total sachin century 51 100% India win 20 39.22 % India lost 11 21.57 % draw 20 39.22 %
Re: Sachin : only 53/100 resulted in victories???shameless.......
by Ravi House on Mar 19, 2012 11:24 AM
The above stats show how idiotic you are. 4 against bangla all in asia. Do not you know that bangla is an asian country and they won't travel outside asia to play cricket? More over you are talking about only 100s. 98 AGAINST pakistan in south africa, 91 against aus in syd 2nd final, 2 90s against sa and eng in england. 90S are as good as 100s but for the statistical purpose. So many of his 90s have won the match for india. Moreover i believe that this match winning knock logic has been brought to counter sachin's matchless performance and popularity. One can play well when all is well which is what the match winning knocks are primarily. One has to fight the odds when nothing is well which is what the knocks that ended in a losing cause. In that way sachin's greatest knocks are played under tremendous pressure which went in vain because all was not going well which primarily means no support from other players.
