Yes, he has right to decide, but similar to a voluntry retirment of an employee. However if he does not cleverly understand when to retire, there has to be a superannuation.
This will be the next headline by Time ( to sell as many copies as they can here) - who the hell asks Time all these things. Sachin, dont worry and dont retire till ur Grandson steps into the crease..!
Every one will be surprised very soon, to find that Sachin 100th 100 was fixed. Sachin was nearing his downfall & some top cricket member(s)had pursued Bangladesh to be soft to help sachin score his 100th 100.
Sachin has served India more than 22 years in cricket. He has played plenty of good cricket and won many cup for India. Still he is good. This is the time for him to retire as he is in good form. His services can be taken by Board by appointing his as coach for batting. His 100th century was not at all his class game. He has scored a century is o.k. but it was not a century of original sachin.
Re: Sachin
by Chat on Mar 19, 2012 11:14 AM
Out of Sachin;s 22 yrs service almost 10 yrs r just waste of talent & failures. Check d records & it shws we have tolerated him fr a long time thn ne1 else.
Re: so
by Orang Tan on Mar 19, 2012 10:57 AM
Yes, why so much importance for Time magazine, first they did cover story on Narendra Modi, now feature on Sachin, what do Americans/ABCDs know about such things anyway ?
Re: Re: so
by Just Fun on Mar 19, 2012 11:06 AM
75% Americans do not that there is a contry called India.To konw this you must stay in the US 2 days.The one or 2 foreign countries known to them r Mexico and Canada
Re: so
by fukeri fukari on Mar 19, 2012 11:00 AM
thats coz ppl like u read it and take notice of it and replies on it. thats y it has so much of impotance
Re: Re: so
by Just Fun on Mar 19, 2012 11:14 AM
You see that the Americans take on the role of World opinion builders and succeed. Think India with its pride in the long past traditons,beliiefs,superstiotions,backwardness,corruptin,shameless behavior easily ruffled emotions(geeta ban In Russia) Even Nepal,Srilanka and Bagladesh don care for India.No question about Pak and Chuan what they do.
Most "Ridiculous" & "Astonishing" Statement coming from "Times"!! "Cricket" is a "Team sport" & "Sachin" is only a "Member" of the "Side". "Sachin" Quietly Accumulaed "Centuries" all these years & "Individually" got "Benefited" in a "Team Sport"!! "Individual Records" are only good for "Magazines"/"Opportunistic Corporate media"/"Sponsors" not for "India". I as a "Citizen" of this "Country" would like "India" winning rather happy with "Sachins Records"!! "Selection" should be based on "Fitness & Performance" but "Sachins" fitness is so poor that he can only "Bat" & the way it is gng he is not bothered abt "Fitness". "Srikant" (Weak man) is waiting for these kind of "Statements" so that he will be "Free" from "Arriving" at a "Decision". "Sachin" should be made "Accountable" to the "Losses" against "Eng" & "Aus"...Same goes to other "Non Performing" Players... "Team Sport" is always "Bigger" than any "Individual".
Re: "Selectors" OR "Sports Monistry" should d
by Rakesh nair on Mar 19, 2012 10:55 AM
"India" can "Confer" "Bharat ratna" on "Sachin" for his "Achievements" but how can a "Team" Continue to "Loose" If that Individual ("Sachin")has "Consistently" performed badly or has bad "Fitness" becoz it affects the "Morale" of the "Team"....... "Sachins" only issue is his poor "Fitness" which "Dhoni" disclosed "Recently"(Slow Movers on the Field)....
