Another way to READ this News is - 1)" At the Age 31 Federer is Earning Double of Dhoni at 31" 2)" Djoko at age 25 is ahead of Sachin at age 39" 3 )" Federer is Earning nearly TRIPLE OF Sachin "
Re: News should be Read differently........................
by madan menon on Jun 20, 2012 02:21 PM
but shakil tennis is truly international and played all wealthy nations including u.s. europe. japan, middle east and china..whereas cricket is poor man's game..it is only played in old british colonies..
Re: Re: Re: dhoni
by Vinita Punjabi on Jun 20, 2012 01:30 PM
Sunil likes Dhoni anything you tell him he wont agree, but yes if you tell good about sachin he will come with lots of lame excuses to degrade him...
Re: Re: Re: Re: dhoni
by prashant chaudhary on Jun 20, 2012 02:38 PM
yes its a graet observation he is comparing sachin with Murli vijay and raina see the my discussion with him in this discussion fouram on just page after this what excuses he has given. sachin was not even played as good as them when he has played same number of game he even forget the age at which that kid has played his first MOM was at the age of 17 in england that even he dont want to agree or not
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: dhoni
by Sunil Vaidya on Jun 20, 2012 02:59 PM
prashant and vinita i dont give these stats when you say good about sachin but i give these stats when you say bad things about other and at the same time comparing them with sachin...so i try to give the comparison game the correct direction....
prashant you should know by now that murali vijay has scored almost identical runs in tests like sachin at the same juncture? so i am correct am i not? similarly also compare raina's career stats with the same point of time as laxman...arent' they the same? so have i made any wrong points? so if sachin and laxman can go on to be successful players from such bad starts why cant others do the same? and if their records so far make them bad then werent sachin or laxman equally bad? what is lame about my arguments???
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: dhoni
by Sunil Vaidya on Jun 20, 2012 03:01 PM
so sachin got a MOM at 17 in england...so??? when did his first odi century came? only after he started to open the innings? how many centuries he had when he batted down the order in his firsr 60-65 odd odis...ZERO!!!
As compered to India Djoko and Bolt are from Poor countries. Dhoni's earnings from cricket is Mere 3.2 million as compered to Djoko's 11.1 Million from Tennis. it is simply - over popularity of cricket that has given Dhoni edge over world fame sportmen. We must compere 31 year Old Federer with 31 year Dhoni. Australians who are Masters of Cricket and Cricket inventor England DO NOT give this much importance to Cricket.
Re: Djoko , bolt are from poor countries..........
by Riju Jose on Jun 20, 2012 01:53 PM
That is a dumb analogy... what about the American Football, Basketball and even Golf players in the list? Those games are not even half as popular as cricket, even if you take number of people watching or the number of countries participating. So lets give it to Dhoni to being such a brilliant brand for himself. Making money doesnt have to do much about your sporting talents, thats why a 37 year old David Beckham earns more than Messi and CR7.
id dhoni wins test in NZ n WI then its no big deal as NZ is d the new zimbabwe after stephen fleming, nathan astle n bond NZ is equivalent 2 zimbabwe under heath streak
n der is no diff between WI n Bangladesh test team now a days so dhoni is lucky dat after he bcame test captain NZ n WI r not the same strong sides they were b4 2005-06
Re: dhoni
by Chaturchuramoni Chatterjee on Jun 20, 2012 01:23 PM
No difference between WI and Bangladesh? Australia recently failed to win an ODI series against them, and that too when Chris Gayle was not playing.
Re: dhoni
by Chaturchuramoni Chatterjee on Jun 20, 2012 01:24 PM
Dhoni did not lose 8 consecutive tests, the home series against West Indies came in between,
Re: dhoni
by silver mani on Jun 20, 2012 12:50 PM
If he could have won these 8 tests,he could have earned in Billions..Poor dhoni now has to satisfy with millions only....
So dhoni earned 26.5 million dollars in ad. That is 2.65 crore dollars and 132 crores in Rs. I wonder which advertiser is paying Dhoni so much. Pepsi, Mcdowell is there. And India Cements
Re: So much money???
by Jiju on Jun 20, 2012 12:19 PM
The main issue is that, there are 2 Indians in the 100 richest sportspersons. We should be proud of that (even if we dont like them).
Re: Re: So much money???
by piyush singh on Jun 20, 2012 03:09 PM
these are legends in their areas. they cant be compared with money. Guys stop commenting you all have nothing more than playing galley cricket.
Dhongi is worth more than 1000 crores if they will also take his match-fixing income into account. Sreenivasan and pawar made lot of money from fixing that's the reason they want dhoni as a captain even if he fails personally or as a captain.
Re: Dhoni is worth more than 1000 crores !!
by prashant chaudhary on Jun 20, 2012 11:41 AM
O SORRY WE FORGET TO ACCOUNT THAT INCOME NEXT TIME WE LL TAKE CARE OF THAT.
Re: Dhoni is worth more than 1000 crores !!
by yahoo on Jun 20, 2012 12:18 PM
so i guess srinivasan, pawar and dhoni fixed to win the world cup?? I heard of fixing to lose, what is this fixing to win?
Re: Re: Dhoni is worth more than 1000 crores !!
by PANKAJ SAWANT on Jun 20, 2012 12:36 PM
Yes, you are right dhoni batted excellently and even bowled and fielded also. He won worldcup single handedly.
Re: what
by Chaturchuramoni Chatterjee on Jun 20, 2012 01:25 PM
Government of India earns a lot of revenue from any test/ODI/T20/IPL match played in India.
Re: what
by HEMANT MEHANT on Jun 20, 2012 11:14 AM
its the dimwittted people of india like you who have made him king by watching TV and cricket, drinking coke 24 hrs a day.
Re: what
by silver mani on Jun 20, 2012 11:33 AM
Privatemail,both dhoni and tendu are officers .Dhoni is Lt.Col in Indian Army ,while Tendu is Group Captain in Indian Air Force and Member of PArliament.Both are soldiers..
terrible defeats never ever happened...sha.me.ful defeats rather back to back against Australia, Asia Cup, Tri series in Australia and England has exposed Dhoni's every bit of leadership. A cow,ard, defensive captain in the history of Indian Cricket...taking all the credit for teams success, blaming others for failures, playing his cham,chas, selecting his spoons(eh) is all he has given in the team...his favouritism comes before Team's interest... such a pathetic leader
Re: Riding only on Luck
by Anurag Rathore on Jun 20, 2012 11:03 AM
Luck!!! I am not surprised because most people only remember the recent things. List is too long of his achievements. I just mention only his test format achievements: 1.First indian captain who won test series in NZ 2.First indian captain who drew test series in SA 3.Nine consecutive test victories under his belt that too against world top teams like Aus, SA etc. 4.2-0 victory over Australia in test series that too when they had Gilly, Hayden like players 5.Test series victory in WI
Don't talk about Asia cup since India have already lift Asia cup in his captaincy that too without the front line players.
Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by xvcxvxvv vxvxvxvx on Jun 20, 2012 12:20 PM
Go keep praising bro! He has made his life in endorsements thanks to people like you!
Re: Riding only on Luck
by Anurag Rathore on Jun 20, 2012 11:07 AM
One more thing which you need to know. Dhoni is not a selector. Otherwise his best friend RP Singh never drops from the side. And his anti like Sehwag would have dropped long back. I think you are not aware about RP-Irfan issue. It's very obvious that there is a rift between Srikanth and Dhoni and Dhoni is not getting the team of his choice. I think you also don't know that Dhoni pointed out unfit and injured players selection in T-20 WC and Eng tour.
Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by Sunil Vaidya on Jun 20, 2012 11:23 AM
those saying dhoni is lucky and riding on others performances and he himself contributes nothing are cricket illiterates of the first order...
Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by prashant chaudhary on Jun 20, 2012 11:40 AM
dHONI IS NOT GETTING TEAM OF HIS CHOICE ANURAAG AND SUNIL VAIDYA ARE JOKING. SIR RAVIDRA JADEJA, SURESH RAINA, MURLI VIJAY, ROHIT SHARMA ARE GETTING CHANCES MORE FREQUENTLY THAN RAHANE, CHETESHWAR PUJARA, U MAY SAY RAINA PERFORM WELL BUT IF AFTER PLAYING 10-20 MATCHES IF IN ONE OR TWO MATCHES HE PLAYS WELL THATS NOT ENOUGH ATALL.
Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by Krishna on Jun 20, 2012 12:33 PM
Suresh Raina plays at a position which cannot be compared with openers and 1st down position. Rahane has played international cricket and compare those performances against the rest.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by Sunil Vaidya on Jun 20, 2012 01:07 PM
exactly....you cannot compare rahane with raina...their batting positions are different....besides pujara was injured most of the time so you cant blame dhoni that pujara is not in the team...and certainly at present he can only come in test team...and till dravid, sachin and laxman were there i wonder where mr. prashant chaudhary would fit mr. rahanae and pujara in the test team...besides raina is a proven successful odi and T20 player as regards test matches raina is just at the start of his career and it is unfair to blame him too much...mr chaudhary you can check sachin and laxman at the stage where raina is now and compare sachin and laxman at the same point of time as raina is that is the same no. of tests and innings and see where they stand in comparison with each other...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by Sunil Vaidya on Jun 20, 2012 01:10 PM
mr. chaudhari, i suppose you know what murali vijay's test record is...i suggest you check sachin's record at the same juncture...and compare them...one would be forced to say that either murali vijay is as good test player as sachin or sachin was as bad test player as murali vijay...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by Vinita Punjabi on Jun 20, 2012 01:34 PM
hahahahah what a jokes Anurag....Please tell me what was dhoni's contribution, please tell us. These victories came while he was leading Ganguly's team....what about the younsters he is getting into this team....how have they fared? Explain yourself first.... Why is he not able to handle this team now? hahahaha Hewas only riding high on team which dada made....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by prashant chaudhary on Jun 20, 2012 01:39 PM
MR. SUNIL VAIDYA SACHIN WAS OF 16 YEARS OF AGE WHEN HE HAS STARTED PLAYING AND BY UR LOGIC OF THE POSITION HE HAS PLAYED (AS IN CASE OF RAHANE AND RAINA) HE HAS PLAYED AT NO 4 OR 5 SO ITS REALY BETTER THAN RAINA VIJAY AND SIR RAVINDRA JADEJA. THESE THREE MIGHT HAVE NOTY PLAYED IN RANJI AT THE AGE OF 16 IST IT AND YES THEY CANT BE COMPARE WITH SACHIN AS HE WAS EXCEPTIONALY WELL WHEN HE WAS AT HIS AGE HIS FIRST MATCH(TEST & ONE DAY) IF U REMEMBER I BET NO ONE CAN CRITICIZE THE MAN THERE I HAVE SEEN U R THE FIRST PERSON.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by Sunil Vaidya on Jun 20, 2012 02:00 PM
mr chaudhary i cannot make head or tails of your latest message...by the way why do you always have to shout in capitals? can you speak in a low voice please...
and in case you didnt undertand my message let me tell you that at the no. of tests matches and innings murali viajay played and sachin they have an almost identical record...
similarly you can check laxman's record and how big a failure he was early in his career for first 2 or 3 years before he became successful which was later...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by Sunil Vaidya on Jun 20, 2012 02:02 PM
and btw i dont agree with you that sachin played exceptionally well in his first test (or test series) and his first odi...he became successful much later i am afraid to say...and that too most of the times when conditions were favourable...in difficult conditions sachin does not have as good a record to call him as exceptional....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by prashant chaudhary on Jun 20, 2012 02:10 PM
SUNIL, when they(sachin & murli Vijay) have played same number of game what was there age may be sacin was of 19 or 20 and he is playing in senior team and murli vijays age even i dont want to check 26 or 27 and avg in test is around 30 & in odi around or less than 20 so was sachins avg was so low at that time whn he was a kid.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by prashant chaudhary on Jun 20, 2012 02:18 PM
u might have not seen his first match which was un official math against pakistan he has hit 4 sixes in a over to abdul kadir or mushtaak i dont remember the name of bowler what u expect from a boy of 16 years & in test may be it was his second he has scorerd 50 after getting hit on his head
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Riding only on Luck
by prashant chaudhary on Jun 20, 2012 02:20 PM
his first Man of the match award in Old Trafford, Manchester is it in india 1990 at an age of 17
