Who will tell Tandulkar that Team Indian does not need you anymore. We lost 8 matches in a row on foreign pitches only because of you. We new it all that you play for records. Don't you aspire to retire gracefully like the all times greats like Viv Richards, Imran Khan. How long will you block a place for a younster in the team. What makes you stay in the team that made you lose so badly. We didn't want to remember you as the player who contributed to 8 staright defeats of team India. But what can we do. You write this epitome yourself.
Re: TANDULKAR
by Guest on Feb 09, 2012 03:28 PM
Who will tell Tandulkar?? Not you of course who doesn't even know how to spell his name. And 8 straight defeats just because of him??? Are you crazy?
Re: sunil gavaskar wants to the next coach
by Rahul Kamble on Feb 09, 2012 02:50 PM
I M FULLY IN AGREEMENT WITH U...GAVASKAR AND HIS SUPPORTED TATTOS ARE ONLY PLAY FOR THEMSELVES...
Gavaskar is like a kid lost in a toy shop when it comes to praising tendulkar. His intention is tendulkar should get his 100th 100. and will support him till he gets there. But alas like bradman who finished his career averaging 99 tendulkar will also finish his career with 99 hundreds
Plaster has not been able to score the 100th in last 28 innings. he wants him to play another 15 innings & another 100 innings to enbale him to achieve the 100th. therafter he along with shastri will tell the entire world that "he is the best batsman in the world - we told you so".
Re: Re: Re: REMEBER WHAT SHAKESPHERE SAID ABOUT CRICKET...
by sikkim manipal University on Feb 09, 2012 02:38 PM
And One fool is watching and making comments...
Re: REMEBER WHAT SHAKESPHERE SAID ABOUT CRICKET...
by venky on Feb 09, 2012 02:39 PM
first u dont be a fool by telling it said by shakesphere..first stop acting smart
Re: Tandulkar
by sikkim manipal University on Feb 09, 2012 02:40 PM
When he plays it is for him and he fails then it is for nation.....don`t be so mean....
Both the English and Aus Tests series were complete whitewash with Sachin playing all matches and Sehwag & Gambhir being part of only the Aus series. So, even with all three playing India could still lose the Tri-series also. Then what is so sacrosanct about Sachin's place in the side when he cannot help the side win or draw even a single match? The team management were severely criticized by the media and experts like Sunil Gavaskar when Rohit Sharma did not get even a single match in Tests and when A Rahane was sent back w/o p-laying a game.? That is why now the team mgt. has taken the right decision to rotate the 'three' to ensure that at least Rohit Sharma gets to play. Gavaskar cannot have both ways.--head I win tail you lose. Won’t it be a retrograde step dropping youngsters for Sachin who played both one dayers but with negligible contribution ? The first match India lost and the second match India won not because of Sachin or Sehwag but because of youngsters. Sachin’s contribution of 50 Runs even Manoj Tiwary could have done. The necessilty for rotation has arisen because of inclusioin of Sachin and w/o him building a youger side with bench –strength & Sehwag and Gambhir as openers is far simpler. Gavaskar should ask why M Tiwary is not playing and not worry about Sachin if he has real concern for future of Indian cricket.
Re: GACASKAR SHOULD BE ASKING WHY NO MANOJ TIWARY?
by zeng dada on Feb 09, 2012 02:39 PM
Gavaskar is not a committee member, so don't take his advice seriously.
