We have enough stars but no star performance!! England has more alrounders compare to any team in world at the moment. high balance team should have 3 specialist bats men,1 part time batsmen, 1 optional part time batsmen, 3 alrounders (2bowling 1keeping), 3 specilist batsment (great if 1 player is good in batting)
Re: Alrounder policy only saves indian in near future
by Ashsish on Dec 07, 2012 06:50 PM
We have enough stars but no star performance!! England has more alrounders compare to any team in world at the moment. high balance team should have 3 specialist bats men,1 part time batsmen, 1 optional part time batsmen, 3 alrounders (2bowling 1keeping), 3 specilist bowling (great if 1 player is good in batting)
Dhoni made a big mistake by not playing Harbhajan . Harbhajan should have been picked instead of Ashwin . Zaheer should be properly rehabilitated , he is clearly struggling . Ishant Sharma should have been dropped and Amit Mishra should have been played . England have got batsman who play off spin well . Mishra is a very good leg spinner . He is just not being given enough chances . Technically sound players like Rahane , Rayudu and Manoj Tiwary should be a part of middle order sooner than later , else Indian batting is going to struggle for a long . They are brilliant fielders too .
it shows the total failure of indian bowling department not batting department.316 is not a bad score in 1st inns.ind bowlers should have been restricted eng batsmen below 300.
Dhoni insists on turning track. Apne hi Jaal Me Fans Gaya. Our batsman can’t face Panesar, Swann whereas English batsman easily facing our so called world renowned spin attack.
It is better if we loose. the interest in cricket will be as good as in hockey. MSD, sehwag,sachin gambhir are good for nothing. selectors are to be blamed for not playing players like jadeja, manoj tiwari etc. at least they can play better in india.
