Re: Re: India team for remaining WC matches
by Shahid on Mar 02, 2011 05:55 PM
Yuvraj didn't take atleast 1 wicket though. We need bowlers who take wickets to win a match.
Re: India team for remaining WC matches
by sukhmeet singh on Mar 02, 2011 05:45 PM
no matter what the team is, if there bowling and fielding is not ok... india is in for a big trouble
Re: ICC RULES
by Senthil Kumar on Mar 02, 2011 05:43 PM
Stupid. Batsman always gets a benefit of doubt becoz he just have one chance. Bowler , if he is good, can always come back and take the wicket of the next ball.
Re: Re: ICC RULES
by sakar panch on Mar 02, 2011 06:27 PM
nope. not true. bowlers are constrained with 10 overs. Batsmen can merrily play upto 50 overs.
Re: On field umpires are not required...
by Vinayak Deshpande on Mar 02, 2011 05:44 PM
we also have star TV showing special replays. don't think umpires needed at all. So in Future; Dhoni could call his wife and get the decision.
Re: Re: On field umpires are not required...
by sakar panch on Mar 02, 2011 06:28 PM
stupid star tv. not able to provide sniko and hot spot for a world cup.
Re: Re: Re: Re: On field umpires are not required...
by sakar panch on Mar 02, 2011 06:29 PM
sure does. for bat edges. Now we have LBW decisions on technology sans a mechanism to indicate whether he got an edge.
This clown called silly Billy (Bowden) is so biased against Indians is evident from the way he was forcing Zak to stand in a particular position. Can he do the same to an Australian or an Englishman?
Re: Read rules before complaining, ICC tells Dhoni
by Varun on Mar 02, 2011 05:30 PM
Why is he biased ? Thats nonsense. He could have done better having got a second look. There is no victimization here.
Re: Re: Read rules before complaining, ICC tells Dhoni
by sunil vaidya on Mar 03, 2011 01:00 PM
pseudo:
it is YOU who does not understand. why do you come with your chorus line 'whole world against you. eh?' when that is not even the issue. it is not that we think the whole world is against us ... ;)
your problem is that you think it is 'we against the whole world'. get out of that attitude. you think we are always against the whole world. that's your problem ... ;)
Re: Read rules before complaining, ICC tells Dhoni
by Senthil Kumar on Mar 02, 2011 05:47 PM
Stupid. Billy Bowden is one of the best (if not the best) in today's available umpires. I like the way he stood by his decision after the UDRS. The bottom line is LBW is a decision which can be given only if the umpire (or tech) is 100% sure that it will hit the stumps. In all other cases, the batsman gets the benefit of doubt.
LBW is the stick by which whites can defeat any black team. This draconian measure is used in all sports all over. You need a crafty thinking and a foxy outlook to find these anomalies.Jasmine revolution needed to kickstart to uproot the hegomony of white skin -We the Indian generate the bulk of revenue from Cricket-We promote the game-We will have the amjor say in all matters concerning the cricket-New Delhi should be the Head Quarters for world Governing Body.
Re: LBW is the stick by which whites can defeat any black tea
by Vinayak Deshpande on Mar 02, 2011 05:45 PM
then what's the black man heading the ICC is doing?
All balls must be reviewed unless runs have been scored or left.Strauss was out twice neither the umpire nor the Indian players had a clue.Maybe even Strauss!Did he cheat??
Abd what abt ball from the off-side.don't discriminate balls from the legside.
The 2.5 metre shd be marked then the square leg umpire may also miss one or two balls.
I feel a decision on all balls by 4 parties would not be feasible.Some wrong calls or a bit of cheating would remain...like match/spot fixing. triky 2/3/2011
Re: indians captain should be shamed
by Vinayak Deshpande on Mar 02, 2011 05:49 PM
he is doing to hide his stupid decision to give 2nd last over to the Chawla and the too-many runs scored in that - turned the whole match upside-down. We effectively lost 1 point which will cost us dear!
Re: indians captain should be shamed
by Parth Mehta on Mar 02, 2011 05:23 PM
Saurav, even Andrew Strauss and Ian Bell did not know the rules. It is impossible for any players to read all the rules. We don't read IPCs and CrPCs before driving on road or living our lives.
Re: indians captain should be shamed
by Naveen C on Mar 02, 2011 05:28 PM
dhoni is correct..... why the new rule is put forward to the public before implementation.....
Re: indians captain should be shamed
by VR on Mar 02, 2011 05:32 PM
Yes I agree with you. As a captain of India Cricket you must know all the rules & regulation of game.This is a good lesson to Mr.Dhoni before saying any thing through media he should know what he is doing.For that match against England no doubt they played much better than us we are the looser that day we should accept that.Plz.concentrate on next game specially with bowlers & feilding. Good Luck
plant front foot 2.5 ft forward and play football in cricket forget of getting out LBW.!!! if u loose 2 udrs umpires have freehand to be trigger happy no check!!!!!
Re: ICC bunch of fools!!!
by Varun on Mar 02, 2011 05:22 PM
peterson could use it well. If all umpires follow text book without applying the common sense part, then yeah. If they use sense, they could give such people out as the final judgment is with them.
plant front foot 2.5 ft forward and play football in cricket forget of getting out LBW.!!! if u loose 2 udrs umpires have freehand to be trigger happy no check!!!!!
Re: just
by Parth Mehta on Mar 02, 2011 05:21 PM
I agree. If this rule is applied, any good batsman can play 2.5 meters outside the crease to fast bowlers and even to spinners and they would never get LBW at least with the UDRS>
Re: Re: just
by Against Pseudos on Mar 02, 2011 05:25 PM
Mehta:
So they should and so they have even before UDRS. Why do you think WK started standing up to even medium pacers? Obviously to drag back the batters in the crease.
Re: Re: Re: just
by Parth Mehta on Mar 02, 2011 05:30 PM
Against Pseudos: Yes, batsmen have in the past but not on every occasion. With this rule, batsmen can take more advantage of it, that is the point I am making. Even the tail-enders which many a times get trapped LBW on the block hole, can survive with this rule.
If Hawkeye has confirmed that ball would hit the stumps, what are those unwritten rules that are coming in between? Article could have been more informative on how many times was hawkeye ignored by umpire.
