Re: Re: Comparison
by niraj vijay on Dec 25, 2010 05:33 PM
Bradman has played for a very short term.and less teams ..21 years of cricket and such superb consistency is what rocks...
Re: Comparison
by suhas vankudre on Dec 25, 2010 05:20 PM
what is the harm in praising sachin, eventhough nobody seen playing bradman it doesn't make any difference. What sachin is done for indian and world cricket is very clear. So please praise him.
They played in different eras. Don played against fiery fast bowlers who got assistance from pitch. Sachin played against the best swing and spin bowlers of the modern era who employ the best tactics and make use of the pitch intelligently. So they are totally different. Allow them to remain like that. Please....
Re: Re: Please do not compare Don with Sachin
by suhas vankudre on Dec 25, 2010 05:22 PM
yes do agree, but sachin has played in three forms of cricket and as well first class cricket.
Come on man... what the hell is comparision for...sachin is gud no doubt, but comparision does not exists...cricketing times have changed.... had bradman be there now.. he might have surpassed Sachin.. by miles..and other way also.. If u really want to make comparision make it with some one who is of currect age.. or from 80's etc etc... its all immature and bull sh*t talk
Sacin is Plays for himself. Example is the way he go disappointed when India Declared at when he was at 196..He just couldnt hide his dissapointment. Then he feel even more when we lost the inningg defeat in the first test. .Syndney test in 2003-2004 series. The series was 1-1, the series was completely dominated by Dravid and Laxman and Shewag. Sachin got out almost every match by giving slip catches. So to prove a point he didnt even touch a ball on halfside.. He played completely onside. He made 200 (470 balls). In the second where a quick 50 is required he made 60(90). I feel this match we drwan becos of him. But everybody blamed Parthiv of dropping Steves Catch. I think a person with 15 years of batting experience and over 600-700 runs in sydney pitch could have played a better inning and after all it was a flat pitch. He just wanted to prove a point that he can score in Australia..He was least worried about India winning the series. He was more interested in hiself scoring a big one.
Re: Selfish Cricketer
by Amrit Patil on Dec 25, 2010 02:12 PM
You are great critic than Chapple, Tonny Greag no doubt but try to remember have ever made 10-15 runs in your galli Cricket? You are saying that he got disappointed when he was not out on 196 & India Declared , just show me any batsamn in the world who is happy or not dissappointed when one is on the verge of completing his 100-200 & if gets out or innings decleared. Just try to understand one thing that why his wooried about big score because ultimately he want to see big score of team.
Re: Re: Selfish Cricketer
by Srini Krish on Dec 25, 2010 02:39 PM
Hi Amrit,
Thanks for rating me better than Chappel and Tonny. Yeah you dont have to play Cricket to be Critic..As Cricket is a religion in India you dont need a Speical practice.
Remeber Devillers was 278 when Smith decalred in one match. excpet for Indians..or may Lara to certain extent..other cricketers dont look much into records. Devillers is not like sachin..may be might have Short Career..I am not sureif he will make 300.
If this has happened in India..I know this wuld be big story than Indian victory or losing.
Re: Re: Re: Selfish Cricketer
by abhay bisen on Dec 25, 2010 03:55 PM
again donot have to play cricket to e critic ? then how will you know that what are the conditions when ball swings or tough to play ? when you do not understand this then how will you know what graetness he has , i.e. why your view point and view point of other people who actually played cricke differs , because we know he plays a sencible cricket , just name any great cricketer who agrees with your point , to make a true critics one should have complete knowledge of that subject
Re: Re: Re: Selfish Cricketer
by abhay bisen on Dec 25, 2010 03:51 PM
so is that problem of sachin or Indians ? if smith has declared that inning when devilias at 296 then definately he have got disapointed so use your brain to compare , by your logic u only know to criticize and have no knowledge of cricket , it is saidly to say none of great cricketers agree with your views , this shows your immature knowledge about cricket , so go now and play with tenis ball
Re: Re: Re: Re: Selfish Cricketer
by Lokesh on Dec 25, 2010 05:48 PM
Well said Abhay.. Sachin is just for making his personal records, no other cricketer played/survived 20 years in cricketing history. Any one who spends 20 years can break this record. Even if we have lost the match India is proud of it. Isn't it foolish !! I will praise sachin if he gets the world cup. He will play in 2015 WC also if we loose it next year.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Selfish Cricketer
by koni on Dec 26, 2010 11:24 AM
lokesh dont be jealous and cry on hard working people. be work hard for country.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Selfish Cricketer
by koni on Dec 26, 2010 11:23 AM
y pakis bark here. true indians loves sachin. whatever is the situation and results. sachin works hard and plays for country. i think u forgot. people used to switch off the tv, when sachin got out. there is nothing to prove sachin. none of the great cricketer said sachin is selfish. great bowlers and great batsman loves sachin batting and his character.
Yes, every one is among world's BEST - but what about current Test Series -Already down in 1st Test & Likely to losses another as well. Great Going Guys!
Don was the best during his era of cricket and now Tendulkar is best during the present era of cricket.
Lot have changed in the play of cricket. Because of Don, Tendulkar is being compared to his achievement. So definitely he is great. Its like father is the greatest tutor to his children though he is not well qualified but he has shown his children the correct tutor. Like wise, Don is the tutor for Tendulkars progress and achievements.
