Re: Sachine needs to be honored in an official ceremony by cool dude on Dec 25, 2010 01:34 AM oh really bt i never saw rahul every year geting padma,ajun,bravery awards.. who gave 10 lakh cheques to athleteics?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Sachine needs to be honored in an official ceremony by gopal kumar on Dec 25, 2010 01:33 AM i think u too r indian......    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: .............. by vijay on Dec 24, 2010 11:28 PM 6) Bradman didnt travel to the subcontinent, so didnt play high class spin. In contrast tendulkar dominated warne,saqlain etc. Great player of spin,pace and swing! 7) Bradman didnt have the pressure of ODIs and 2020s.Tendulkar not only played record no of ODIs but also is the leading runs and century scorer. Mind boggling to go alongwith 15000 plus test runs 8) Bradman didnt have the pressure of 1 billion. In india, 1 billion pray that SRT scores big every time he walks out. 9) No media to rip Bradman. While aajtak,and other crappy channels blast tendulkar for any failure. 10) Tendulkar didnt have the support of a good batting order, and remember him playing with likes of somasundran,bharadwaj,noel david,ramesh,ss das and stuff. Bradman was part of invincibles, so batting was shared. 11) Finally tendulkar is a known partnership breaker..150 ODI wickets. A true genious indeed!! 12) Also playing for so many years and so many matches like Tendulkar is staggering. To survive the fitness aspect itself is awesome. Bradman had the luxury to play far fewer matches and remain fit. Tendulkar lost some avg due to fitness.Bradman didnt play 22 years non stop but tendulkar is doing just that and that too with such consistency which is remarkable. 13) and in bradman's era fielding was very poor ,no conscious diving efforts to save 4s n even singles as it happens nowdays.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: .............. by vijay on Dec 24, 2010 11:30 PM cricket was not that hard at DON's time..he played basically against ENGLAND & few matches against 2-3 more oppositions hardly.. 52 matches in span of 20 years where sachin more than thrice i.e. 3 times test matches alone in the same played, 176th in 21 years.. cosidering so tough so competitive cricket & so many cricket, T20s, ODIs, IPL , injury scares always considering all these facts, 57 avg now-a-days is almost equivalent to that magical 99.94 avg & mainly DON played against only one opposition ENGLAND so he became used to the bolwing attack against him.. ya wish him 50 ODI 100s as well, even if he scores 47 or 48 100s he will still remain great.. 100 100s in international he should definately score, should.. over 50 100s over 15000 test runs , over 18000 ODI runs with 48 or may be 50 100s.. wow.. with 33500 or a bit more than that runs with 100 odd 100s in 22-23 yrs.. woooooooooow    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: .............. by bango tango on Dec 24, 2010 11:35 PM pathetic knowledge of urs !!!! 1.ground was smaller in Bradman's era !!!!!! 2.Bradman's era , there was full bodyline bowling ... 3.Tendulkar had got once to represent the country in 98 Commonwealth Games cricket....in C' Games, Olympics, Asian Games , thr is no prize money....u ve 2 perform for the country passionately to win a medal.... The scores of Sachin were in all the 3 matches, 15 against Antigua & Barbuda , 2 vs Canada ( both as opner), 19 vs Aus coming at 2nd down ....    Forward   |   Report abuse

Message(s) deleted by moderator not displayed on this page

Message(s) deleted by moderator not displayed on this page

Click here to view messages reported for abuse