tendulkar played all kinds of opponents, against all sides, on all kinds of surfaces, under intense media scrutiny & mad public demand in india, video analysis of weakness, the whole lot of factors bradman did not face, also bradman got enough rest and played in his comfort zone against one country and knew its uni dimensinal attack. also, the opposition had this psyche of defeat against a good batsman. bradman never faced a non descript but good rookie bowler who could upset the rhythm of even the greatest batsmen. sachin has been at constant odds against all kinds of situations.
Re: tendulkar wins hands down
by James Bond on Dec 23, 2010 09:57 PM
loadsa ppl say there were no protective gears at that time...well protective gears don make batsmen genius..if thats so..i can also beat breadman
I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND THIS CAMPARISON.BOTH OF THEM ARE GREAT PLAYERS BRADMAN ERA WAS DIFFRENT THAN TENDULKAR.IF WE WANT CAMPARE THEM TENDULKAR HAS TO GO BACK AND PLAY IN THE PAST AND BRADMAN HAS TO PLAY IN THE PRESENT.SO I BELIVE ITS NONSENSE TO CAMPARE THEM.BRADMAN IS BRADMAN TENDULKAR IS TENDULKAR,CRICKET IS CRICKET
Re: nope nt him
by Rajesh SHENOY on Dec 23, 2010 10:00 PM
Cricket is team game honey? It's not like Men's single's tennis or badminton, played by a single player... :).. So grow up!!!
Re: Re: nope nt him
by sameer pandita on Dec 23, 2010 10:00 PM
Desi Babu Get your figures right yashpal sharma was an allrounder and believe me a better bowler than most of the ones we have got today .
To me best isnt all about runs and records in addition to this it means character and attitude to handle pressure which tendulkar lacks and last 5 world cups are typical example .
To me Kapil Dev is still the hero he made his mark in batting as well as bowling and for your information when it really mattered 1983 WC .Think over it .
Re: Re: nope nt him
by sameer pandita on Dec 23, 2010 09:54 PM
i guess you need to hone your history skills . kindly check when the first worldcup was played .
Re: Re: Re: nope nt him
by wizardo id on Dec 23, 2010 09:55 PM
how exactly your judgement applies if you are defying logic - one man cannot win a world cup for a team.
srikanth hegde Re: Re: tendulkarVs bradman. by srikanth hegde (View MyPage) on Dec 23, 2010 09:43 PM You are right!
I want to pose some questions:
Has SRT played against the quality of Roberts, Thomson, Lillie, Sir Hadlee, Imran, Snow, Willis, Holding, Marshal, Garner, Croft, Pascoe, Calrke and others?
Has he played a single match on uncovered wickets?
Has he played any match without wearing a helmet that too against super quick like the ones mentioned above?
What is contribution to the fourth innings score of India. Fourth innings batting means defeat or draw.
Re: Re: SRT vs DB
by Rajesh SHENOY on Dec 23, 2010 10:02 PM
Bandit queen's are not authorised to talk about cricket... Dacoity, robbery and looting should be the topics for which you should give your expert option. Else not simply shut your trap. thank you!!!
You can't compare them, its like comparing s Steam Engine to the modern day Bullet trains. they were the Best in their days. So Bradman was the greatest in his time & Tendulkar is the greatest in this era.
ALWAYS 'TON'DULKAR. WE LOVE YOU. SO PROUD 2 B AN INDIAN. THIS IS JUST A BEGINNING. I DON'T THINK ANY ONE CAN STOP HIM. LOVE YOU TENDULKAR, & LOVE YOU INDIA.
it is unfair to make it understand that how a great batsman of one era can be compared with great batsman of another era.it is really not fair,because people do a fallacy by comparing as comparison itself is an error.
My experience in cricket and watching matches I would say both are great reason is Bradman era was different ball game compared to Sachin both have their qualities and skills which graded both of them best. Thanks Sachin is being Indian be proud all of us we belong to same country. he is the best too.
